Skip to content

Why Don't People Use Shortening Anymore?

4 min read

According to the World Health Organization, trans fats from partially hydrogenated oils can cause cardiovascular disease. This critical health information, along with shifting consumer preferences for whole ingredients, is the primary reason why people don't use shortening anymore.

Quick Summary

This article explores the decline of shortening's popularity, focusing on the discovery of trans fat risks, the FDA ban on partially hydrogenated oils, and the rise of flavorful and healthier alternatives like butter and lard. It details the scientific differences between these fats and how modern baking trends have moved away from heavily processed ingredients.

Key Points

  • Trans Fat Health Concerns: Shortening's decline was primarily driven by the discovery that the trans fats created during partial hydrogenation significantly increase the risk of heart disease.

  • FDA Ban on Partially Hydrogenated Oils: Regulatory action, like the 2015 FDA ban, forced manufacturers to reformulate, eliminating the historical trans fat content but not shortening's tainted reputation.

  • Flavor Preference for Butter: Modern culinary trends favor the rich, superior flavor of butter over shortening's neutral taste, pushing consumers toward more natural-tasting ingredients.

  • Rise of Healthier Alternatives: Beyond butter, bakers now use a variety of alternatives like coconut oil, palm oil, or a blend of fats to achieve desired results with a better nutritional profile.

  • Focus on Natural and Artisanal Ingredients: The broader "foodie" movement and a desire for homemade, less-processed foods contributed to shortening's fall from favor.

  • Improved Baking Knowledge: Home bakers are more informed about the scientific properties of different fats, like butter's water content for flakiness, allowing for more precise and superior results.

In This Article

The Rise and Fall of the Baking Staple

In the early 20th century, Procter & Gamble introduced Crisco, the first all-vegetable shortening, as a revolutionary, shelf-stable, and affordable alternative to animal fats like lard and butter. Its bland flavor and high melting point made it a kitchen workhorse, creating impeccably flaky pie crusts and light, tender cakes. For decades, it was celebrated as a modern, healthy choice over traditional animal fats. However, this perception was built on incomplete science and clever marketing. The process of partial hydrogenation, which solidified the vegetable oils, created trans fats as a byproduct. This silent issue would be the ingredient's undoing.

The Health Epidemic and Regulatory Action

Beginning in the 1990s and early 2000s, an overwhelming body of research emerged, linking trans fats to a host of health issues. Studies showed that trans fats not only increased LDL ("bad") cholesterol but also decreased HDL ("good") cholesterol, significantly raising the risk of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. Health organizations around the world took notice. The culmination of this scientific consensus was the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) declaration in 2015 that partially hydrogenated oils were no longer "Generally Recognized As Safe" (GRAS). This effectively banned the primary source of artificial trans fats from the food supply, forcing manufacturers to reformulate their products. While modern shortenings are now trans-fat-free, the health risks of its past formulation and general consumer awareness have left a permanent stain on its reputation.

Flavor and Modern Culinary Trends

Beyond the health concerns, a major driver in shortening's decline is a simple matter of taste. Shortening, being a pure, neutral-tasting fat, contributes little to no flavor to baked goods. As the "foodie" movement gained momentum, home cooks began prioritizing rich, complex flavors. Butter, with its distinctively creamy, nutty taste, became the preferred fat for everything from cookies to cakes. Modern baking trends emphasize artisanal, wholesome ingredients over heavily processed industrial products. This has led to a renaissance for old-school alternatives like high-quality butter and even rendered lard, celebrated for their superior flavor and perceived naturalness.

Shortening vs. Butter: A Comparison

To understand why bakers make the switch, let's compare the properties of shortening and butter.

Feature Shortening (e.g., modern Crisco) Butter (standard stick) Winner for Most Home Bakers
Flavor Neutral, flavorless Rich, creamy, nuanced Butter
Fat Content 100% pure fat 80–86% fat, 15–20% water and milk solids Shortening (for specific texture goals)
Melting Point Higher (115–120°F) Lower (90–95°F) Shortening (prevents spread)
Effect on Texture Flaky, tender, holds shape well Tender, less-flaky than shortening, can cause more spread in cookies Shortening (for texture)
Workability Very consistent and easy to handle due to higher melting point Temperature-sensitive; can be harder to work with if too warm Shortening
Health Perception Highly processed, interesterified fats may have risks Natural, less processed, some health benefits from vitamins A, D & E Butter

Modern Alternatives and Evolving Techniques

Today's bakers have moved beyond the traditional shortening versus butter debate. While butter has become the go-to, other options offer specific benefits and healthier profiles. Coconut oil, for instance, is a popular vegan, solid fat replacement that can provide tenderness and, if unrefined, a hint of nutty flavor. Palm oil is another option, though it is often subject to environmental concerns. Furthermore, liquid oils like olive or avocado are increasingly used in recipes like muffins and cakes for moisture, though they do not provide the same structure as solid fats.

The evolution of baking techniques has also contributed to shortening's decline. Home cooks are now more savvy about ingredient functionality. They understand how the water in butter creates steam that contributes to flaky layers in pastries, a quality shortening can't fully replicate. Many bakers use a blend of fats—some butter for flavor and a touch of shortening for stability—to achieve the best of both worlds. This flexibility and informed approach reflect a more sophisticated and health-conscious home baking community.

Conclusion: A Paradigm Shift in the Kitchen

The decline of shortening is a clear example of how scientific discovery and changing consumer values can reshape our dietary habits. Once heralded as a modern marvel of convenience and health, its reputation was undone by the discovery of trans fats' detrimental health effects. The FDA's subsequent ban on partially hydrogenated oils cemented its fall from grace. This paved the way for the resurgence of natural, flavorful fats like butter and a greater embrace of health-conscious alternatives. The modern kitchen is a place where flavor and wellness are no longer mutually exclusive, and the once-ubiquitous can of bland, white fat has become a relic of a less-informed era. For modern bakers, the choice is no longer about convenience, but about quality, health, and a return to richer, more natural flavors. For a deeper dive into the health impacts of different fats, refer to Harvard's health guides on the topic.(https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/the-truth-about-fats-bad-and-good)

Frequently Asked Questions

Modern shortening products have been reformulated to be trans-fat-free following regulatory bans on partially hydrogenated oils. However, it is still a highly processed fat, and some health experts express caution about the interesterified fats used in its current production, recommending moderation.

The best alternative depends on the recipe's desired outcome. For rich flavor and good texture, butter is the most popular choice. For flaky crusts, lard is an excellent, traditional option. For vegan alternatives, solid coconut oil or specific palm oil shortenings can be used.

Shortening is 100% fat and has a higher melting point than butter. When cut into flour, its fat molecules create layers that prevent long gluten strands from forming. During baking, these fat layers melt and leave behind tender, flaky layers.

Yes, but with some considerations. Since butter contains water, baked goods like cookies may spread more than with shortening. For pie crusts, the added water in butter can create steam, resulting in a flakier (but potentially less tender) crust. You may need minor adjustments for the best results.

Historically, partially hydrogenated shortening offered a longer shelf life due to its altered chemical structure, which made it more resistant to oxidation and rancidity. However, this benefit came at the cost of producing harmful trans fats.

The name 'shortening' comes from its function in baking. By interfering with the development of long, tough gluten strands in dough, it literally 'shortens' them, resulting in a more tender and crumbly texture, especially in pastries and biscuits.

Many bakers consider high-quality rendered lard superior for creating flaky baked goods, and it has a more neutral, cleaner flavor than shortening. Unlike shortening, lard is not a heavily processed, industrially hydrogenated product, and high-quality versions from pasture-raised pigs may offer more nutrients.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.