Skip to content

Why is canned tuna not healthy to eat? The surprising risks and healthier choices

5 min read

According to a 2023 Consumer Reports study, mercury levels can spike unpredictably in individual cans of tuna, posing a risk especially for vulnerable populations. Understanding why is canned tuna not healthy to eat goes beyond mercury and includes other potential contaminants and processing concerns.

Quick Summary

Regularly consuming canned tuna carries health risks due to potential mercury bioaccumulation, high sodium, and BPA exposure. These risks necessitate moderation, careful selection of tuna types, and exploring diverse seafood options.

Key Points

  • Mercury Levels: Tuna, particularly larger albacore, contains mercury, a neurotoxin that can accumulate in the body over time with frequent consumption.

  • High Sodium: Many canned tuna products contain significant levels of added sodium, which can contribute to high blood pressure and heart-related issues.

  • BPA Exposure: The lining of some tuna cans contains BPA, a chemical linked to potential health risks, which can leach into the food.

  • Inconsistent Mercury: Tests have shown that mercury levels can vary unpredictably from can to can, making consistent safe consumption difficult, especially for sensitive groups.

  • Safer Alternatives: For regular intake, lower-mercury seafood like sardines and salmon are preferable to high-mercury tuna varieties.

  • Moderation is Key: Canned tuna should be consumed in moderation as part of a varied diet, not as a daily or primary protein source.

In This Article

The Primary Concern: Mercury Contamination

Mercury is a heavy metal that enters the ocean through natural events like volcanic eruptions and human activities such as burning fossil fuels. In the water, bacteria convert it into methylmercury, a toxic form that accumulates in fish and can destroy nerve tissue in humans. As tuna are predatory fish higher up the food chain, they accumulate more mercury than smaller fish, and this mercury is then passed on to consumers. While all marine organisms contain some level of mercury, the concentration is what poses the risk. For most healthy adults, consuming tuna in moderation is manageable, but for pregnant individuals, young children, and those with specific health conditions, the risks are significantly higher. A 2024 study in ScienceDirect evaluating canned tuna found that mercury levels posed a potential health risk, especially in terms of non-carcinogenic hazards, confirming that contamination remains a concern despite regulatory limits.

Different Tuna Types and Mercury Levels

Not all canned tuna is created equal when it comes to mercury content. The species of tuna used in canning, its size, and its age all affect the final mercury concentration. This is why labeling is crucial for making an informed choice.

  • Albacore (White) Tuna: This type of tuna is typically from a larger species and thus has higher mercury levels. Due to this, health authorities recommend significantly limiting its consumption, especially for pregnant individuals and children.
  • Light (Skipjack) Tuna: Sourced from smaller, younger fish, light or skipjack tuna contains substantially less mercury than albacore. It is generally considered a safer option for more frequent consumption, although moderation is still advised.

High Sodium Content

Many popular canned tuna products are preserved in brine or oil, which results in a high sodium content. While the amount can vary by brand and packing liquid, a single can can contribute significantly to a person's daily sodium intake. A high-sodium diet is a known risk factor for high blood pressure, heart disease, and kidney issues. For those monitoring their sodium levels, this is a major drawback of canned tuna. Consumers should always check the label for 'no salt added' or low-sodium varieties to minimize this risk. However, even without added salt, canned tuna naturally contains some sodium, so it is important to balance your overall diet.

The Hidden Threat: Bisphenol A (BPA)

Another concern with canned tuna and other canned goods is the potential for exposure to bisphenol A (BPA). This industrial chemical is used in the lining of metal cans to prevent corrosion. BPA can then leach into the food, and studies have shown canned tuna can have some of the highest levels of BPA among canned products. BPA exposure has been linked to various health issues, including reproductive abnormalities and an increased risk of certain cancers, diabetes, and heart disease. Although the effects of BPA are still under debate, recent testing continues to show its presence, even in products labeled 'BPA-free'. This has prompted bans in some regions and further emphasizes the importance of limiting exposure where possible.

Nutritional Compromises in Canned Tuna

While canned tuna is celebrated for its protein and omega-3 content, the canning process can affect its nutritional profile. Compared to fresh tuna, canned tuna, particularly those packed in oil, may have slightly different fat content. The high-heat process can also degrade some nutrients. Canned tuna packed in water typically has lower calories and total fat than oil-packed versions, which is a factor to consider depending on dietary goals. For maximum omega-3 benefits, fresh tuna is often recommended over canned.

Healthier Seafood Alternatives and Practices

If you enjoy fish but want to reduce your intake of mercury and processed foods, several delicious and healthy alternatives exist. Diversifying your seafood sources is key to getting a broad range of nutrients without over-relying on a single, potentially problematic one.

  • Canned Salmon: Often packed with skin and bones (providing a great source of calcium), canned salmon is much lower in mercury than albacore tuna and is rich in heart-healthy omega-3s.
  • Sardines: These small, sustainable fish are packed with omega-3 fatty acids, calcium, and vitamin D. They are very low in mercury due to their small size and are an excellent nutritional powerhouse.
  • Mackerel: Another oily fish low on the food chain, mackerel is lower in mercury and offers a rich supply of omega-3s, benefiting brain and heart health.
  • Plant-Based Options: For a vegetarian take on tuna salad, chickpeas mashed with mayonnaise and seasonings can provide a similar texture and can be used in sandwiches or salads.
  • Canned Chicken: For a non-fish alternative, canned chicken breast offers a convenient and high-protein option with no mercury concerns.

Choosing Wisely: A Comparison of Canned Tuna Types

Feature Light (Skipjack) Tuna White (Albacore) Tuna
Mercury Content Low High
Omega-3s Moderate High
Fat Content Low Higher
Best for Regular consumption in moderation; budget-friendly option. Occasional treat for higher omega-3s, but limited intake is advised.
Vulnerable Groups Recommended over albacore for pregnant women and children (with limits). Best to limit or avoid for pregnant women and children.
Flavor Stronger, more robust flavor Milder flavor and firmer texture

Conclusion: Moderation and Informed Choices

While canned tuna is a convenient, affordable source of protein and some essential nutrients, it is not a universally healthy food for unrestricted consumption. The potential for mercury accumulation, particularly in albacore varieties, coupled with concerns over high sodium and BPA in can linings, means that it is best enjoyed in moderation. For those at higher risk, like pregnant women and young children, following specific intake guidelines or choosing lower-mercury options is paramount. By diversifying your protein sources with low-mercury fish like sardines or salmon, and opting for water-packed, low-sodium, and BPA-free options when purchasing, you can minimize the associated risks. Making informed, balanced dietary choices is the key to reaping the benefits of seafood while avoiding the potential downsides of canned tuna. A link to a full Consumer Reports study provides further insight into mercury variation in tuna cans: How Worried Should You Be About Mercury in Your Tuna?.

Frequently Asked Questions

For most non-pregnant adults, the FDA recommends limiting albacore tuna to one 4-ounce serving per week. For light or skipjack tuna, it's safer to have two to three servings per week, balanced with other seafood.

Symptoms of chronic mercury poisoning can include memory loss, irritability, tingling sensations, and impaired speech or walking. Severe cases can lead to serious neurological issues.

Pregnant women should be cautious with canned tuna due to mercury risks. The FDA advises limiting consumption of canned light tuna to two to three servings per week and restricting albacore tuna to one weekly serving.

Light tuna (skipjack) is generally considered healthier for frequent consumption because it comes from smaller fish and has significantly lower mercury levels than white (albacore) tuna.

While choosing 'no salt added' varieties significantly reduces sodium, canned tuna naturally contains some sodium. Those on a salt-restricted diet should still be mindful of their overall intake.

Yes, excellent low-mercury canned alternatives include sardines, canned salmon, and mackerel. These options offer similar convenience with higher levels of omega-3s and lower mercury risk.

For a lower-calorie, lower-fat option, tuna packed in water is preferable. Oil-packed tuna has more calories and total fat, though it is still a good source of protein.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.