Skip to content

Why not drink filtered water? Unveiling the Potential Drawbacks

5 min read

According to a 2023 survey in the UK, 42% of people don't trust or like the taste of their tap water, leading many to install filters. But while many see it as a health upgrade, there are critical reasons why not drink filtered water that deserve consideration.

Quick Summary

The potential drawbacks of filtered water include mineral depletion from certain systems, bacterial contamination from poor maintenance, significant environmental waste, and ongoing costs.

Key Points

  • Mineral depletion: Some filtration systems, particularly reverse osmosis, remove essential minerals like calcium and magnesium.

  • Bacterial growth: If not replaced regularly, filters, especially activated carbon types, can become breeding grounds for harmful bacteria.

  • Environmental waste: The consistent need to replace plastic filter cartridges contributes to significant landfill waste.

  • Ongoing costs: High initial purchase prices and the recurring expense of replacement filters make filtration an ongoing financial commitment.

  • False security: Many filters don't remove all types of contaminants, and relying on them without understanding their limitations can create a false sense of security.

  • Unnecessary expense: In areas with safe municipal water, filters may be an unnecessary expense, primarily improving taste rather than safety.

  • Water wastage: Some advanced filtration systems, like reverse osmosis, waste a significant amount of water during the purification process.

In This Article

The Cost of Purity: Losing Essential Minerals

While many filtration systems are designed to remove harmful contaminants, some, particularly reverse osmosis (RO) systems, are so effective that they also strip away beneficial minerals. Minerals such as calcium, magnesium, and potassium are naturally present in tap water and contribute to overall health, playing a role in bone strength, heart health, and proper metabolic function. The World Health Organization (WHO) has raised concerns about the long-term health effects of consuming water with low Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), noting that demineralized water can lead to an electrolyte imbalance. While our diet is the primary source of these minerals, water can be a significant contributor, especially in hard water areas. Exclusive consumption of demineralized water over long periods can potentially increase the risk of certain health problems due to a lack of essential mineral intake.

The Hidden Hazard: Contaminated Filters

One of the most concerning drawbacks of water filters is the risk of bacterial contamination, especially if they are not maintained properly. Activated carbon filters, a common type found in pitchers and refrigerator dispensers, can become a breeding ground for bacteria over time. These filters adsorb organic matter, which can serve as a food source for bacteria, leading to the growth of biofilms. Studies have shown that filtered water from poorly maintained systems can have significantly higher bacterial counts than the unfiltered tap water they were meant to improve. The risk of contamination increases significantly when a filter is used past its recommended lifespan, making diligent filter replacement critical for safety. For immunocompromised individuals, this risk is particularly pronounced.

Is a Water Filter Necessary? Evaluating Tap Water Quality

In many developed countries, public tap water is subject to rigorous testing and treatment to meet strict health and safety standards. If your municipal water supply is of high quality, a filter may be unnecessary. The primary purpose of many common filters is to improve the taste and odor of tap water, often by removing chlorine, rather than addressing serious health threats. It is important to remember, however, that while water quality at the source may be high, contaminants like lead can still leach into the water from old pipes within a home. Before investing in a filtration system, it is prudent to test your local tap water to determine if there are any specific contaminants that need to be addressed. You can find guidance on how to do this on the CDC's website.

The Environmental and Economic Price Tag

Choosing to filter water at home is not without its costs, both for your wallet and the environment. Most filters require periodic replacement, and the disposal of used plastic filter cartridges contributes to landfill waste. The environmental footprint of producing, packaging, and transporting these single-use cartridges is significant. Furthermore, reverse osmosis systems are known for their high water wastage, as they use a considerable amount of water to flush away impurities during the filtration process. The expense of a water filter system includes not only the initial purchase price but also the ongoing cost of replacement filters, which can add up significantly over time. For households already served by safe drinking water, this cost may be difficult to justify.

Comparing Water Sources

Feature Tap Water (High-Quality Supply) Standard Filtered Water (Pitcher) Reverse Osmosis Filtered Water
Mineral Content Balanced; contains essential minerals Retains most essential minerals Significantly reduced / minimal minerals
Contaminant Removal Meets strict safety standards; may contain trace chemicals Removes chlorine, improves taste/odor; limited contaminant removal Removes vast majority of contaminants and dissolved solids
Bacterial Risk Low, due to municipal disinfection (e.g., chlorine) Low, if filter maintained; High, if filter is old Low, when operating correctly
Cost Very low (utility bills) Low to moderate (filter replacements) High (initial investment and replacements)
Environmental Impact Low Moderate (disposable plastic cartridges) High (water waste and disposable filters)

The Problem with Over-Filtration

Beyond mineral depletion, some high-level filtration can also remove beneficial elements. For example, some filters may remove disinfectants like chlorine that municipal systems add to prevent bacterial regrowth within plumbing. If these disinfectants are removed and the filter itself becomes contaminated, it can lead to worse water quality at the tap. There is also the issue of a false sense of security; many filters are not effective against all contaminants, and relying on one without understanding its limitations could expose users to risks they don't realize are present. The best approach is to test your water and select a filter specifically designed for the issues you face, if any, rather than assuming more filtration is always better.

What to Consider Before Filtering Your Water

Here is a list of factors to consider to make an informed decision:

  • Test Your Water: Contact your local water provider for a quality report or have your water tested by a certified lab. This will tell you precisely what, if any, contaminants are present.
  • Match the Filter to the Problem: Not all filters are created equal. Choose a filter that is certified to remove the specific contaminants you are concerned about. A simple carbon filter won't remove lead, for instance.
  • Prioritize Maintenance: Adhere strictly to the manufacturer's replacement schedule to prevent bacterial buildup and reduced effectiveness. Never use a filter past its expiration.
  • Consider Remineralization: If you choose a system like reverse osmosis that strips minerals, consider a remineralization stage or balancing your mineral intake through diet.
  • Weigh Environmental Costs: Evaluate the environmental impact of disposable cartridges and water waste from certain systems. Explore longer-lasting or more sustainable filter options.

Conclusion: A Balanced Perspective on Water Filtration

Deciding to drink filtered water is a personal choice, but it is one that should be made with a full understanding of the trade-offs. While filters can offer an extra layer of protection against certain contaminants and improve taste, potential drawbacks—such as mineral depletion, the risk of bacterial contamination from poor maintenance, and significant environmental and financial costs—are not insignificant. For those with high-quality municipal tap water, the benefits of standard filtration may be minimal. Ultimately, the best course of action is to research your specific water quality and weigh the pros and cons of filtering, ensuring that any system you choose is properly maintained and aligns with your health and environmental priorities.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, some advanced systems like reverse osmosis can strip water of essential minerals such as calcium and magnesium. Long-term, exclusive consumption of this demineralized water could potentially lead to mineral deficiencies if not offset by diet or remineralization.

Yes, if not properly and regularly maintained, especially activated carbon filters, can become breeding grounds for bacteria. The filtered water can end up with higher bacterial counts than the unfiltered tap water.

In many areas with high-quality municipal water, extensive home filtering is not strictly necessary for safety as the water is already treated and tested. However, filters can improve taste and address contaminants from old pipes.

The main environmental impact comes from the plastic waste generated by regularly replacing filter cartridges. This contributes to landfills and pollution.

To prevent bacterial contamination, you must follow the manufacturer's recommended replacement schedule strictly. Using a filter past its designated lifespan increases the risk of contamination.

Some systems, particularly reverse osmosis, can waste a significant amount of water in the process of flushing away contaminants. The amount of waste varies by system efficiency.

Demineralized water from certain filtration processes can have a lower pH, making it more acidic. Some research suggests this could have potential long-term health implications.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.