Skip to content

Are Khand and Stevia the Same? Unpacking the Key Differences

4 min read

Despite being considered natural alternatives to refined sugar, khand and stevia are fundamentally different substances. While one is a form of unrefined sugar from sugarcane, the other is a non-nutritive, zero-calorie plant extract with a distinct chemical composition.

Quick Summary

Khand is a less-processed sugarcane sugar with calories and a brown color, while stevia is a zero-calorie, non-nutritive sweetener derived from the stevia plant leaves. They differ significantly in source, calorie content, and impact on blood sugar.

Key Points

  • Source: Khand comes from sugarcane, while stevia is derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant.

  • Calorie Content: Khand contains calories and carbohydrates, whereas pure stevia extract is a zero-calorie sweetener.

  • Blood Sugar Impact: Khand affects blood sugar levels similar to regular sugar, making it unsuitable for diabetics in excess, while stevia does not raise blood glucose.

  • Processing: Khand is minimally processed, retaining some molasses and minerals, while commercial stevia is a highly purified extract.

  • Flavor Profile: Khand has a rich, caramel-like flavor, whereas stevia offers an intense sweetness that can have a bitter or licorice-like aftertaste for some.

  • Health Benefits: Stevia is often chosen for weight management and blood sugar control, while any health benefits of khand are marginal and do not justify excess consumption.

In This Article

Khand vs. Stevia: Understanding Their Origins and Production

To understand whether khand and stevia are the same, it is crucial to examine their origins and how they are processed. These two products, though both marketed as 'natural,' have entirely different foundations.

Khand, also known as desi khand, khandsari, or muscovado sugar, is an unrefined or partially refined form of sugar typically made from sugarcane juice. The traditional process involves boiling sugarcane juice, often with some additives like lime, until the liquid evaporates and crystals form. Unlike highly processed white sugar, which has all its molasses stripped away, khand retains some of its natural molasses content. This gives it a slightly brown color, a rich, caramel-like flavor, and a softer texture. Since it is less refined, it is sometimes perceived as a healthier alternative to white sugar, though it still primarily consists of sucrose and contains calories.

Stevia, on the other hand, is derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant, a native of South America. Its sweetness comes from compounds called steviol glycosides found in the plant's leaves. The commercial production of stevia involves extracting and purifying these compounds. Because steviol glycosides are 200–400 times sweeter than table sugar, only a tiny amount is needed to achieve the same level of sweetness. The resulting pure stevia extract is a non-nutritive sweetener, meaning it contains zero calories and does not affect blood sugar levels. This fundamental difference in chemical makeup and calorie content is the most significant factor separating khand and stevia.

Key Nutritional and Health Impacts

Comparing khand and stevia reveals major differences in their nutritional profiles and effects on the human body, particularly for those managing health conditions like diabetes. While khand offers minimal added nutrients, stevia is valued for its zero-calorie profile.

Key differences include:

  • Caloric Content: Khand, as a form of unrefined sugar, contains calories and carbohydrates, providing energy to the body. Stevia, by contrast, is a zero-calorie sweetener, making it a popular choice for weight management.
  • Glycemic Index: Khand is still a form of sucrose and can cause blood sugar spikes, making it unsuitable for individuals with diabetes, although some claims suggest a lower glycemic index than refined sugar due to its molasses content. Stevia has a glycemic index of 0 and is safe for diabetics, as it does not impact blood glucose levels.
  • Processing: Khand is minimally processed, retaining some trace minerals and nutrients, including iron and calcium. Stevia is highly purified to extract the intensely sweet steviol glycosides, though the end product is still considered 'natural'.
  • Flavor Profile: The flavor of khand is often described as rich, with notes of caramel or toffee. Stevia's taste is intensely sweet, but some people report a slight aftertaste, sometimes described as licorice-like or bitter.
  • Applications: Khand can be used as a direct sugar replacement in cooking, baking, and beverages, although its flavor profile may alter the final dish. Stevia requires careful measurement due to its high potency, and its lack of volume and different chemical properties can affect the texture of baked goods.

Comparison Table: Khand vs. Stevia

Feature Khand (Khandsari/Desi Khand) Stevia (Purified Extract)
Source Sugarcane juice Leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant
Processing Minimally processed, unrefined Highly purified to extract steviol glycosides
Calories Contains calories (from sucrose) Zero calories
Blood Sugar Impact Can cause blood sugar spikes No impact on blood sugar levels
Glycemic Index (GI) Varies, but can cause a rise in blood sugar 0
Nutritional Content Trace minerals and nutrients from molasses No nutritional value
Sweetness Mild, similar to brown sugar 200–400 times sweeter than sugar
Flavor Caramel-like, earthy Intense sweetness, potential aftertaste
Suitability for Diabetics Not recommended for regular use Considered safe for regular use

Making the Right Choice for Your Health

When deciding between khand and stevia, your personal health goals and dietary needs are the most important factors. For those seeking to manage weight or control blood sugar, stevia is the clear choice. Its zero-calorie, zero-carbohydrate profile makes it an excellent option for diabetics or individuals on a ketogenic diet. However, some may find its flavor aftertaste off-putting, and it behaves differently than sugar in baking.

Khand, while less processed than white sugar and containing trace minerals, is still a form of sugar that impacts blood glucose levels. It is not a magical 'health' sugar and should be consumed in moderation, just like any other sweetener. For those who prefer a less refined sugar with a richer flavor profile and don't need to strictly monitor calorie intake, khand can be a suitable choice for occasional use. Its use aligns more with traditional cooking and as a healthier alternative to white sugar, not as a calorie-free substitute.

For most people looking to seriously reduce their sugar and calorie intake, stevia offers a superior alternative. It allows for the enjoyment of sweetness without the associated health risks of high sugar consumption, such as weight gain and blood sugar fluctuations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the answer to the question, "Are khand and stevia the same?" is a definitive no. Khand is a minimally processed sugarcane sugar with calories and a distinct taste, while stevia is a zero-calorie, non-nutritive sweetener derived from a plant, with no effect on blood sugar. Your choice between them should be based on your health priorities, whether it's calorie reduction, blood sugar management, or a preference for a less refined sweetener. For those with diabetes or strict calorie-control goals, stevia is the safer and more appropriate option. For others, both should be consumed in moderation as part of a balanced diet.

For additional information on stevia and other sugar alternatives, you can consult resources from major health institutions. For instance, the FDA provides useful information on approved sweeteners.

Note: Always consult a healthcare professional or registered dietitian before making significant dietary changes, especially if you have pre-existing health conditions like diabetes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Khand is generally considered a slightly healthier alternative to refined white sugar because it is less processed and retains some trace minerals from the sugarcane juice, such as iron. However, it is still mostly sucrose and contains calories, so it should be consumed in moderation, especially by diabetics.

No, pure stevia extract contains zero calories and is a non-nutritive sweetener. This makes it a popular choice for people looking to reduce their calorie intake for weight management or other dietary reasons.

Diabetics are generally advised to use khand with extreme caution or avoid it entirely. As a form of sugar, it can raise blood sugar levels, similar to refined sugar. Stevia is a much safer option for managing blood sugar.

Stevia's taste is caused by compounds called steviol glycosides. At high concentrations, some of its extracts can produce an aftertaste described as licorice-like or bitter, which can be more noticeable to some individuals.

While both are unrefined sugarcane products, khand is typically a granulated or crystalline sugar, whereas jaggery is a more concentrated, solidified, and darker form. Both should be used in moderation as they both contain sucrose.

Substituting stevia for sugar in baking can be tricky. Stevia is much sweeter and doesn't provide the same bulk or chemical properties as sugar, which can affect the texture and rise of baked goods. It requires specific conversion ratios and recipe adjustments.

No, not all stevia products are the same. The FDA has only approved highly purified steviol glycoside extracts (like rebaudioside A) for use as a sweetener, not whole stevia leaves or crude extracts. Some commercial products may also blend stevia with other sweeteners or fillers.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.