The Core Concept: Reference Amounts Customarily Consumed (RAACs)
At the heart of how are serving sizes determined is a concept known as the Reference Amount Customarily Consumed (RACC). The RACC is a standardized, science-based value set by the FDA that represents the amount of food the average person typically consumes in a single eating occasion.
To establish these reference amounts, the FDA analyzes data from national food consumption surveys, such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The RACC is not a dietary recommendation but a regulatory benchmark, ensuring that nutrition information is consistent and comparable across similar products.
How RAACs Lead to a Serving Size
To translate a RACC into a serving size, manufacturers follow a specific procedure:
- Categorization: First, they identify the appropriate product category from the FDA's extensive RACC tables. This step ensures that similar foods, like all brands of ice cream or chips, use the same reference amount.
 - Household Measurement: The RACC, typically listed in grams (g) or milliliters (mL), is then converted into a more familiar "household measure," such as a cup, tablespoon, or number of pieces.
 - Calculation and Rounding: The manufacturer calculates the amount that most closely approximates the RACC. For example, if the RACC for chips is 28g (1 ounce), and a single chip weighs 2g, the serving size on the label might be listed as "about 14 chips (28g)". Rounding rules are applied to ensure the household measure is practical for consumers.
 
Updated Regulations and Dual-Column Labels
In 2016, the FDA mandated significant updates to the Nutrition Facts label, primarily to reflect more current consumption data.
- Reflecting Reality: The updated regulations saw some serving sizes increase and others decrease to better match what people actually eat. For instance, the RACC for ice cream was changed from ½ cup to ⅔ cup to reflect actual consumption, while the RACC for yogurt decreased from 8 ounces to 6 ounces.
 - Single-Serving Packages: The new rules require that items typically eaten in one sitting, even if they contain more than one RACC, be labeled as a single serving. A 20-ounce bottle of soda, for example, is now listed as one serving.
 - Dual-Column Labels: For packages containing between two and three servings, dual-column labels are now required. These labels provide nutrition information per serving and per container, making it easier for consumers to understand the total calorie and nutrient intake if they eat the entire package.
 
Serving Size vs. Portion Size: The Key Distinction
This is one of the most common points of confusion for consumers. A serving size and a portion size are not the same thing, though the terms are often used interchangeably.
Comparison of Serving and Portion
| Aspect | Serving Size | Portion Size | 
|---|---|---|
| Definition | A standardized, regulated amount of food or drink. | The amount of food you choose to eat at one time. | 
| Determined by | The FDA, based on national consumption data (RAACs). | The individual consumer, influenced by hunger, plate size, and social cues. | 
| Purpose | To provide a consistent, comparable basis for nutritional information. | To satisfy one's appetite and personal preference at a given moment. | 
| Measurement | Standardized units like cups, ounces, grams, or pieces. | Highly variable and not standardized. Can be more or less than a serving size. | 
Factors Beyond RAACs Affecting Serving Size Perception
While regulatory bodies set the official serving size, consumer perception and behavior are influenced by many other factors.
- Visual Cues: Studies have shown that package size and the images of food on packaging can act as implicit consumption norms, influencing how much a person serves themselves. Larger packaging can inadvertently lead to consuming a larger portion.
 - Product Marketing: Companies may sometimes exploit serving sizes to make a product seem healthier. For instance, listing a smaller, less realistic serving size can reduce the apparent calorie or sugar content per serving, though labeling laws are now stricter on this.
 - Social and Emotional Factors: Our eating habits are not purely based on biological hunger. Psychological research indicates that factors like gender, age, and emotional state can significantly impact the size of the portion we select for ourselves.
 
Using Serving Size Information Effectively
For health-conscious consumers, understanding how to use the information on the Nutrition Facts label correctly is crucial. It requires going beyond simply reading the serving size and looking deeper into the data provided.
- Calculate Based on Your Portion: If you eat a larger portion than the listed serving size, remember to scale the nutritional values accordingly. For a product with two servings per container, eating the whole package means doubling the calories, fats, and sugars.
 - Compare Products: Use the standardized serving sizes to compare the nutritional profiles of similar products accurately. This is the primary benefit of the RACC system. For example, compare the amount of sodium or fiber per serving between two different brands of soup.
 - Visualize the Measurement: Many health guides recommend using common objects or your own hand as a visual guide for estimating portions. For example, a deck of cards is a good approximation for a 3-ounce serving of meat.
 
Conclusion
Understanding how serving sizes are determined reveals that they are not arbitrary recommendations but carefully standardized measurements based on real consumer habits. These regulatory values, or RAACs, provide a transparent and consistent way to compare the nutrition content of different foods. While a serving size offers a regulated reference point, the amount you actually eat—your portion—is influenced by many personal and environmental factors. By learning to differentiate between these two concepts and properly interpreting the information on food labels, consumers can make more informed and mindful choices about their dietary intake.