Skip to content

Is a Milkshake Healthier Than a Soda? A Nutritional Deep Dive

4 min read

Sugary drinks are a leading source of added sugars in the American diet, and many people wonder: is a milkshake healthier than a soda? This comparison explores the nutritional trade-offs between these two popular treats, revealing that the answer is more complex than it appears.

Quick Summary

This article examines the nutritional profiles of milkshakes and sodas. While milkshakes contain some beneficial nutrients from milk, they are often laden with high calories, sugar, and fat. Soda, conversely, offers empty calories with no nutritional value and poses serious health risks. The healthiest option depends on moderation and preparation.

Key Points

  • Empty Calories: Soda provides a high dose of sugar and calories with zero essential nutrients, contributing to weight gain and chronic diseases.

  • High Sugar Content: Both sodas and commercial milkshakes are often very high in sugar, sometimes with milkshakes containing much more per serving.

  • Nutrient Difference: A milkshake (especially homemade) can provide protein, calcium, and vitamins from milk, which soda completely lacks.

  • Calorie and Fat Load: Commercial milkshakes, with added ice cream and syrups, are often far more calorie-dense and higher in saturated fat than a typical soda.

  • Moderation is Key: Neither is a healthy daily beverage. For optimal health, both should be considered occasional treats, with healthier alternatives like water or seltzer preferred.

In This Article

The Problem with Soda: Empty Calories and Health Risks

For decades, soda has been a ubiquitous beverage choice, but its nutritional profile is unequivocally poor. Regular sugar-sweetened soda contains a high volume of sugar and calories, but provides zero essential nutrients. This means every calorie consumed from soda is an "empty calorie," contributing to energy intake without providing vitamins, minerals, or other beneficial compounds. The health risks associated with regular soda consumption are well-documented and severe. These include an increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Furthermore, the high acidity and sugar content of soda are extremely damaging to tooth enamel, significantly increasing the risk of dental decay.

The High Cost of Liquid Sugar

One of the most insidious aspects of soda consumption is how the body processes liquid calories. Unlike solid food, drinking calories does not trigger the same sense of fullness or satiety. A person can easily consume several hundred calories of soda without feeling full, often leading to increased overall calorie intake throughout the day. The high fructose corn syrup commonly used as a sweetener in soda also fails to activate hormones that regulate feelings of fullness, further exacerbating the issue. This can lead to rapid blood sugar spikes followed by a crash, creating a vicious cycle of cravings for more sugary foods and drinks. For those with or at risk for insulin resistance, this frequent exposure to high sugar loads can worsen their condition over time.

Milkshakes: A Closer Nutritional Look

At first glance, a milkshake seems like a superior choice due to its base ingredient: milk. Milk provides protein, calcium, and essential vitamins like B12 and D, which are vital for bone health, energy metabolism, and muscle function. A simple, homemade milkshake made with low-fat milk and real fruit could indeed offer some nutritional benefits. However, the reality of most commercial milkshakes is far different. Many fast-food or restaurant versions are heavily processed and include large amounts of ice cream, sugary syrups, and other high-calorie additions.

The 'Healthy' Milkshake Myth

According to a survey by Action on Sugar, many commercial milkshakes contain shocking levels of sugar and calories. Some fast-food milkshakes can contain over 39 teaspoons of sugar—more than six times the daily recommended amount for a child. The calorie count can also be staggeringly high, with some versions exceeding half of an adult's daily recommended calorie intake. The substantial fat content from ice cream and cream, when combined with the high sugar load, is a potent mix for weight gain and potential arterial issues. So, while the building blocks of a milkshake might seem healthy, the final product is often a nutritional trap.

The Head-to-Head Comparison

To make an informed choice, it's essential to compare a standard soda with a typical commercial milkshake. Here is a breakdown of their nutritional characteristics:

Feature Standard Soda (e.g., 12 oz) Commercial Milkshake (e.g., 12 oz)
Calories ~140 kcal ~400+ kcal (can be over 600)
Sugar ~39 grams Can have similar or significantly more sugar
Nutrients None (empty calories) Contains calcium, protein, and vitamins from milk
Saturated Fat None High content from ice cream and cream
Health Impact High risk of obesity, diabetes, dental decay High risk due to excessive calories, fat, and sugar; potential for arterial plaque formation

Healthier Alternatives to Consider

If you are looking to quench your thirst or satisfy a sweet craving, there are much better options than either a commercial milkshake or a soda. Making simple substitutions can significantly improve your dietary habits and overall health.

  • Water: The best choice for hydration, with zero calories and sugar. Infuse it with fresh fruit, cucumber, or mint for natural flavor.
  • Flavored Seltzer: Offers the fizziness of soda without the added sugar or artificial sweeteners.
  • Homemade Smoothies: Blend fruits, vegetables, yogurt, and a low-fat milk or plant-based milk alternative for a nutrient-rich beverage with fiber.
  • Unsweetened Tea or Coffee: A simple, healthy beverage, but beware of sweetened specialty drinks.
  • Low-fat Milk: A straightforward way to get the nutrients of milk without the high calories and sugar of a processed shake.

Conclusion: The Final Verdict on Milkshakes vs. Soda

When comparing a typical fast-food milkshake to a standard can of soda, neither is a truly healthy choice, and both should be considered occasional treats at best. However, a commercial milkshake often contains significantly more calories, fat, and sugar, and can pose a greater risk for weight gain and cardiovascular issues. While a milkshake offers the redeeming quality of providing some nutrients like protein and calcium from milk, these benefits are often overshadowed by the excessive added sugar and saturated fat. In contrast, soda offers no nutritional benefit whatsoever, making it a source of pure empty calories. The ultimate takeaway is that while a homemade, mindful milkshake might be a better option than a soda, a commercial milkshake is often the more calorie-dense and nutritionally detrimental choice.

For more information on the health effects of sugary drinks, visit University of Utah Health.

Frequently Asked Questions

A soda's high acidity and sugar content is extremely harmful to tooth enamel, causing decay. While a commercial milkshake is also sugary, the calcium in milk can help protect teeth, making soda generally worse for dental health.

No, a commercial milkshake is not a suitable meal replacement. Despite its high calorie count, it lacks the fiber and balanced nutrients needed for a satisfying and healthy meal, often leading to a sugar crash and increased hunger later.

Typically, yes. By making a milkshake at home, you can control the ingredients, using low-fat milk, fresh fruit, and less (or no) added sugar, which dramatically reduces the calorie and sugar content compared to fast-food versions.

While diet sodas contain zero calories, some research suggests artificial sweeteners may negatively impact gut microbiota and metabolic health. Although a low-calorie option, they still lack nutrients, and the long-term effects are still under study.

The body does not register liquid calories in the same way as solid food. The lack of fiber and chewing means liquid calories don't promote the same sense of fullness, and certain liquid sweeteners don't trigger satiety hormones, leading to increased overall calorie intake.

Yes. Chocolate milk has been recommended by some experts for post-workout recovery because the mix of protein and carbohydrates helps repair muscle tissue and restore glycogen levels. Soda, containing only sugar, provides no such benefits.

For those trying to cut back, try replacing soda with sparkling water with a splash of fruit juice, opting for unsweetened tea, or infusing plain water with fruits and herbs. These changes provide flavor without the empty calories.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.