Skip to content

Is aluminum better than plastic for health?

4 min read

According to a Consumer Reports analysis of a 2018 study, diseases linked to plastic chemicals cost the U.S. an estimated $250 billion in healthcare, highlighting the serious health concerns associated with plastic use. This growing awareness of material safety has prompted many to re-evaluate their everyday choices, questioning whether aluminum is a superior and safer alternative to plastic.

Quick Summary

Generally, aluminum is considered a healthier alternative to plastic for food contact, largely because plastics can leach harmful chemicals and shed microplastics, especially when exposed to heat.

Key Points

  • Plastics Pose Chemical Risks: Plastics can leach harmful endocrine-disrupting chemicals, like BPA and phthalates, into food and beverages, a risk exacerbated by heat.

  • Microplastics are a Modern Threat: Plastic degrades into microscopic particles that can be ingested or inhaled, potentially causing cellular damage and acting as carriers for other toxins.

  • Aluminum is Generally Safe: In standard food contact applications, aluminum is non-toxic and releases only minimal amounts, which are safely managed by the body in healthy individuals.

  • Heat and Durability Matters: Aluminum containers are safe for heating and are more durable, while heating plastic can accelerate the release of dangerous chemicals and wear-and-tear increases leaching.

  • Reduce Exposure by Choosing Alternatives: Opting for aluminum, glass, or stainless steel containers, especially for hot or acidic foods, is an effective strategy to minimize exposure to plastic-related health hazards.

In This Article

Comparing the Health Risks of Plastic

Plastic has become a ubiquitous part of modern life, but its pervasive use comes with significant health and environmental concerns. A major issue is the presence of thousands of chemical additives, many of which are unregulated, and their potential to leach into food and drinks.

Chemical Leaching and Endocrine Disruptors

One of the most concerning aspects of plastic is chemical leaching. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), like Bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalates, are commonly used in plastic production. These substances can interfere with the body's hormonal systems, which control vital functions like reproduction, growth, and metabolism.

Common effects linked to plastic EDCs include:

  • Reproductive Issues: Reduced fertility, impaired fetal development, and reproductive disorders.
  • Metabolic Disorders: A higher risk of obesity and diabetes has been associated with EDC exposure.
  • Cancer: Studies have pointed to correlations between EDC exposure and certain hormone-sensitive cancers, such as breast and prostate cancer.
  • Neurodevelopmental problems: Early life exposure can impact brain development in children.

The Silent Threat of Microplastics and Nanoplastics

Beyond chemical leaching, the physical degradation of plastic presents another health hazard. All plastics eventually break down into microscopic particles known as microplastics and, even smaller, nanoplastics. These particles are now found everywhere, from our food and water to the air we breathe.

  • Ingestion and Inhalation: Humans ingest thousands of microplastic particles annually through contaminated food and beverages, and they can also be inhaled. A 2024 study even found nanoplastic fragments in bottled water.
  • Cellular Damage: Once inside the body, microplastics can potentially cause cellular damage, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Research has detected these particles in human blood, lungs, and even placentas.
  • Toxic Transport: Microplastics can also act as "Trojan horses," carrying additional toxic chemicals into the body and potentially exacerbating their effects.

Vulnerability and Risks

Certain individuals, including pregnant women, children, and people with compromised immune systems, are particularly vulnerable to the health effects of plastic contaminants. The developing brain and hormonal systems of children are highly susceptible to disruption from EDCs.

The Case for Aluminum in Food Contact

Aluminum, in contrast to plastic, is an inert and non-toxic material for food contact, assuming it's used correctly. Unlike plastic, it does not contain EDCs like BPA or phthalates, and it does not shed microparticles.

Minimal Health Risk from Leaching

When it comes to food contact, the leaching of aluminum is minimal. Aluminum is ubiquitous in the environment, and the human body can safely process and excrete normal amounts. However, excessive, chronic exposure in high-risk individuals, such as those with severe kidney disease, can be harmful. For the general population, the trace amounts from food contact materials are not considered a health risk. To further minimize any potential leaching, it is advisable to avoid prolonged storage of highly acidic or salty foods in aluminum containers.

Safe and Durable Properties

Aluminum's durability and barrier properties contribute to food safety. It protects food from light, air, and moisture, preventing spoilage and keeping it fresh for longer. Aluminum containers are also heat-safe and can be used for cooking and reheating without the risk of warping or leaching chemicals, a major advantage over plastic.

Outbound Link: Learn more about the differences between aluminum and plastic at the International Aluminium Institute

Comparison Table: Aluminum vs. Plastic for Health

Feature Aluminum Plastic
Chemical Leaching Minimal leaching, especially with non-acidic foods. Non-toxic. High potential for leaching, especially with heat. May contain harmful EDCs like BPA and phthalates.
Microplastic Contamination Does not degrade into microplastics. Safe from this form of contamination. Breaks down into harmful microplastics and nanoplastics that can be ingested or inhaled.
Heat Safety Safe for heating, cooking, and reheating in ovens. Distributes heat evenly. Many types are unsafe for heating, including microwaves, as heat increases chemical leaching.
Durability Strong, durable, and corrosion-resistant. Can be reused. Can degrade over time, with scratches increasing leaching potential. Less durable.
General Health Risk Minimal risk for the general population. Significant risks associated with EDCs and microplastics, linked to chronic diseases.

Conclusion: Making the Healthier Choice

For most food-contact applications, aluminum presents a healthier and safer choice than plastic. While normal dietary exposure to aluminum is not considered harmful, the potential for plastic to leach endocrine-disrupting chemicals and shed microplastics is a significant and growing health concern. Choosing alternatives like aluminum, glass, or stainless steel for food storage and cooking is a prudent step for mitigating these risks, especially when dealing with hot or acidic foods. Ultimately, reducing dependency on plastic protects not only individual health but also contributes to broader environmental well-being by curbing pollution.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, it is not recommended. Heat can cause plastics to release endocrine-disrupting chemicals like BPA and phthalates more readily. It is safer to transfer food to a glass or ceramic container before microwaving.

Microplastics are tiny plastic particles resulting from the breakdown of larger plastic products. They are a health risk because they can be ingested or inhaled, enter the bloodstream and organs, potentially cause inflammation, and carry additional toxins into the body.

Despite historical concerns, extensive research has found no conclusive evidence linking everyday aluminum exposure from cookware or foil to the development of Alzheimer's disease. The body is very efficient at excreting normal amounts of aluminum.

While 'BPA-free' plastics remove one specific chemical, they often use similar replacements, such as BPS or BPF, which can also be endocrine disruptors with similar health risks. These substitutes have not been fully tested for long-term safety.

Glass and stainless steel are the safest materials for storing hot or acidic foods. For short-term use, aluminum is acceptable, but prolonged contact with acidic or salty foods can cause minimal aluminum leaching.

No, not all plastics are created equal. Different types (identified by recycling codes) contain different chemicals. Some are considered safer for food contact, but all plastics can degrade over time and shed microplastics. Avoiding single-use and heated plastics is the most critical step.

Standard aluminum foil does not have a plastic lining. However, some composite containers might. Aluminum cans and bottles are typically lined with a thin polymer to prevent direct contact between the contents and the metal.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.