Skip to content

Is BPA in Canned Tuna? What Consumers Should Know

4 min read

According to a 2017 study by the Center for Environmental Health, nearly 40% of tested canned foods still contained Bisphenol A (BPA). For health-conscious consumers, this raises a crucial question: is BPA in canned tuna, and what should be done about it?

Quick Summary

Yes, BPA has been found in some canned tuna, including products labeled 'BPA-free'. This chemical can leach from protective can linings into the food and has been linked to health concerns due to its endocrine-disrupting properties. Brands are transitioning away from BPA, but safer alternatives and informed consumer choices are key.

Key Points

  • Prevalence of BPA: Bisphenol A (BPA) has been found in many canned tuna products due to its use in protective can linings.

  • Health Concerns: BPA is an endocrine disruptor, and exposure is linked to reproductive problems, metabolic disorders, and other health issues, especially in vulnerable populations like children and pregnant women.

  • "BPA-Free" Doesn't Mean Zero: Tests show that even products labeled "BPA-free" can sometimes contain detectable levels of BPA from other sources like can lids or processing.

  • Alternative Bisphenols: Some manufacturers replace BPA with other bisphenols like BPS or BPF, which may have similar endocrine-disrupting properties, posing a risk of regrettable substitution.

  • Safer Alternatives Exist: To reduce exposure, consider brands that offer tuna in pouches, glass jars, or have robust third-party verification for their BPA-free cans.

  • Reduce Overall Exposure: Minimize BPA intake by eating more fresh or frozen foods, avoiding heating food in plastic, and rinsing canned items.

In This Article

Understanding Bisphenol A (BPA) and Canned Food

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an industrial chemical that has been used since the 1950s to make certain plastics and resins. It is commonly found in epoxy resins that are used to coat the inside of metal food cans, including those used for tuna. This lining is essential for preventing the can from corroding and contaminating the food with metal, but it allows the BPA to migrate into the food, especially under heat processing during the canning process.

For decades, federal agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) maintained that the low levels of BPA exposure from food were safe. However, as more independent studies have emerged highlighting potential health concerns, consumer pressure has pushed many manufacturers to seek alternatives. While many companies have phased out BPA-based linings, reports have shown that detectable levels can still be present, even in products claiming to be "BPA-free".

The Health Concerns Associated with BPA

Research has linked BPA exposure to a range of potential health problems, primarily because it is an endocrine disruptor. This means it can mimic hormones, such as estrogen, and interfere with the body's endocrine system. This disruption has been associated with:

  • Reproductive Issues: Studies have pointed to potential harm to the male and female reproductive systems and developmental issues in fetuses and children.
  • Metabolic Disorders: A possible link has been suggested between BPA and an increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.
  • Other Potential Effects: Some studies have explored associations with neurological issues, immune system problems, and certain cancers.

Is BPA in Canned Tuna? The Evidence

Several studies and consumer reports have confirmed the presence of BPA in canned tuna. A 2012 Consumer Reports test found that nearly all 19 name-brand canned foods, including tuna, contained some BPA. The levels found varied significantly between brands and even between different lots of the same product.

Furthermore, an alarming 2024 Swiss test highlighted high levels of BPA in certain canned tuna products. These findings underscore the fact that despite some manufacturers' moves towards BPA-free alternatives, complete elimination has been a challenge due to various factors, including contamination during processing or from other components like lids.

What About BPA-Free Labeled Cans?

Testing has shown that even products labeled as “BPA-free” can sometimes contain detectable levels of the chemical. In some instances, the lining was not epoxy-based, suggesting contamination came from another source, like can lids or the processing line itself. This highlights a crucial point: “BPA-free” does not always mean “BPA-zero,” and it is important for consumers to stay informed. A 2016 investigation found that 67% of cans tested still used BPA-based linings, though follow-up tests showed a significant drop in its usage by 2019. However, a newer concern has emerged regarding regrettable substitutions, where alternative chemicals with similar endocrine-disrupting properties, such as Bisphenol S (BPS) and Bisphenol F (BPF), are used instead of BPA.

Making Informed Choices: BPA-Free Alternatives

To reduce BPA exposure, consumers should consider products with verified BPA-free packaging. Some companies have committed to using alternative linings like polyester or non-BPA acrylic coatings. Other options include:

  • Pouches over Cans: Some brands offer tuna in plastic pouches, which often have immeasurable or much lower levels of BPA compared to their canned counterparts.
  • Glass Jars: Choosing products packaged in glass jars is another way to avoid can linings altogether.
  • Trusted Brands: A growing number of brands, including Wild Planet and Safe Catch, have established reputations for using BPA-free linings and regularly testing their products.
  • Fresh or Frozen: Opting for fresh or frozen seafood instead of canned is an easy way to completely avoid BPA from can linings.

Comparison Table: BPA-Free and Conventional Tuna Options

Feature BPA-Free Canned Tuna Conventional Canned Tuna Tuna in Pouches Fresh or Frozen Tuna
BPA Risk Very low to negligible (can vary) Moderate to high Very low to negligible None
Convenience High (shelf-stable) High (shelf-stable) High (shelf-stable) Low (requires preparation)
Cost Typically higher Often lower Can be higher Variable
Flavor/Texture Consistent, dependent on pack style Consistent, dependent on pack style Consistent, dependent on pack style Optimal, depends on cooking
Mercury Risk Present in both depending on tuna species Present in both depending on tuna species Present in both depending on tuna species Present depending on tuna species

Reducing Overall BPA Exposure

Beyond choosing BPA-free products, there are additional steps you can take to minimize your total exposure to this chemical:

  • Prioritize Fresh Foods: Incorporate more fresh or frozen produce and protein into your diet to reduce reliance on canned goods.
  • Avoid Heating Plastics: Never microwave food in plastic containers, as heat can cause BPA to leach more readily. Use glass, porcelain, or stainless steel for heating instead.
  • Rinse Canned Foods: While not foolproof, rinsing canned goods can help reduce the levels of BPA, as a 2020 study on canned beans confirmed.
  • Use Alternatives: Store food in glass or stainless-steel containers instead of plastic ones.

Conclusion

Yes, BPA has been a common component in the epoxy linings of canned tuna, posing a potential health risk due to its endocrine-disrupting properties. While many manufacturers have moved to phase out BPA, detectable levels can still appear, sometimes even in products labeled “BPA-free,” partly due to contamination or the use of substitute bisphenol chemicals. Consumers can reduce their exposure by seeking verified BPA-free brands, opting for tuna in pouches or glass, choosing fresh or frozen seafood, and following general guidelines to avoid heating food in plastic. As regulatory standards evolve and consumer awareness grows, the industry continues to shift towards safer packaging materials, but staying informed remains the consumer's best defense against chemical exposure.

Explore more information on BPA and food safety from the Environmental Working Group.

Frequently Asked Questions

BPA is used in epoxy resin liners on the inside of metal cans to prevent corrosion and protect the food from contact with the metal. This lining helps extend the shelf life of canned goods like tuna.

Rinsing canned foods, including tuna, can help lower the level of BPA present. A study on canned beans found that rinsing was an effective method to reduce BPA exposure.

Not necessarily. Studies have found detectable levels of BPA in some products labeled "BPA-free". This can be due to cross-contamination during production or from other components of the packaging, such as lids.

Research has shown that some BPA alternatives, such as Bisphenol S (BPS) and Bisphenol F (BPF), also have endocrine-disrupting properties, leading to concerns about "regrettable substitutions".

Several brands have committed to BPA-free packaging, including Safe Catch, Wild Planet, and some offerings from Vital Choice. Many are available in cans or pouches, with manufacturers often stating their commitment to using alternative linings.

Tuna packaged in plastic pouches generally has significantly lower, and often immeasurable, levels of BPA compared to tuna in cans with epoxy linings. This makes pouches a common alternative for those seeking to minimize BPA exposure.

The primary route of human exposure to BPA from canned foods is through migration of the chemical from the can's internal lining into the food itself. This migration can increase with heat.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.