Skip to content

Is Brisk Healthier Than Soda? A Direct Nutritional Comparison

4 min read

According to the Public Health Law Center, sugary drink consumption is consistently linked to weight gain, obesity, and an increased risk of chronic diseases like type 2 diabetes. Many seek out alternatives, but does a tea-based beverage like Brisk offer a genuine health advantage over traditional soda?

Quick Summary

A nutritional comparison of Brisk and soda reveals both are high in added sugars, including high fructose corn syrup, and provide minimal nutritional value. The tea base in Brisk does not negate its high sugar content and health risks, making it far from a truly healthy beverage choice. Healthier alternatives are readily available.

Key Points

  • Not a Healthy Alternative: Brisk is not significantly healthier than soda, despite being tea-based, due to its high added sugar content and processed ingredients.

  • High Sugar Content: Both Brisk and soda contain high amounts of added sugar, often in the form of high fructose corn syrup, which contributes to health problems like obesity and diabetes.

  • Processed Ingredients: Many Brisk flavors, like most sodas, contain artificial sweeteners, preservatives, and phosphoric acid, which add no nutritional value and may have health implications.

  • Empty Calories: Both beverages provide minimal-to-zero nutritional value, offering 'empty calories' that can lead to weight gain and do not satisfy hunger.

  • Healthier Alternatives Exist: For actual health benefits and hydration, unsweetened tea, water infused with fruit, or seltzer with a splash of juice are far better choices.

  • Read the Label: The 'tea' label on Brisk can be misleading; it's essential to read the nutrition facts and ingredient list to understand the actual content of any packaged beverage.

In This Article

Unpacking the Perception: Brisk vs. Soda

For years, Brisk, a ready-to-drink iced tea brand, has cultivated an image as a cool, edgy alternative to traditional sodas. This positioning can lead many consumers to assume that, because it is tea-based, it must be inherently healthier than carbonated soft drinks. This 'health halo' effect, however, can be misleading. While unsweetened tea offers numerous health benefits due to its flavonoids and antioxidants, Brisk's formulation includes many of the same concerning ingredients found in traditional sodas.

The Ingredient Reality: Beyond the Tea Leaves

A direct look at the ingredient list for Brisk and a standard soda reveals striking similarities, particularly regarding sweeteners. While Brisk contains black or green tea powder, this is often overshadowed by the high concentration of added sugars and artificial ingredients. The primary sweetener in many Brisk varieties is high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), which is also a staple in most conventional sodas. Both beverages also rely on citric acid, preservatives like potassium sorbate, and often, artificial colors. Some Brisk variants also contain low-calorie sweeteners like sucralose and acesulfame potassium, in addition to HFCS, further complicating their nutritional profile. These are not natural, healthy additions, but rather heavily processed compounds.

A Closer Look at the Nutritional Facts

When we compare Brisk to a standard soda, the difference is often less significant than marketing might suggest. A 12-ounce serving of Brisk Lemon Iced Tea contains about 70 calories and 17 grams of sugar, while a 12-ounce Pepsi contains about 150 calories and 41 grams of sugar. While Brisk appears to have fewer calories and less sugar per serving, it is not a low-sugar drink. A single bottle or can can quickly contribute a substantial amount of added sugar to one's daily intake. The US Dietary Guidelines recommend limiting calories from added sugars to less than 10% of total daily calories, and a single sweetened beverage can make this difficult to achieve.

Comparison Table: Brisk Lemon Iced Tea vs. Pepsi (12 oz. Serving)

Feature Brisk Lemon Iced Tea Pepsi Conclusion
Category Tea-based Beverage Soda Both are sugar-sweetened beverages.
Calories ~70 calories ~150 calories Pepsi has more, but Brisk is still high for a beverage.
Added Sugar ~17g ~41g Brisk is lower but still contains a significant amount.
Primary Sweetener High Fructose Corn Syrup, Sucralose, Acesulfame Potassium High Fructose Corn Syrup Both rely on added sugars and artificial sweeteners.
Caffeine ~8mg ~37.5mg Brisk has less, but still contains some.
Nutritional Value Minimal (contains trace tea) None (empty calories) Neither offers meaningful nutrients.
Concerns Added sugar, HFCS, artificial sweeteners, preservatives, food dyes Added sugar, HFCS, preservatives, phosphoric acid Both have high sugar content and processed ingredients.

The Health Implications of Processed Sugar

Both Brisk and soda contribute significantly to added sugar intake, which poses a number of health risks. Excessive sugar consumption is a major contributor to obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The body metabolizes the high amounts of fructose in HFCS, found in both beverages, primarily in the liver, which can lead to fat production and potentially non-alcoholic fatty liver disease over time. The 'liquid calories' from sweetened drinks are not as filling as solid foods, leading to higher overall calorie intake because people don't compensate by eating less.

Other Ingredients to Consider

Beyond sugar, other ingredients raise health concerns. The phosphoric acid present in some Brisk flavors is also a common component in many sodas, particularly colas. This additive has been linked to potential negative impacts on bone health, though more research is needed. The presence of artificial sweeteners like sucralose and acesulfame potassium in some Brisk Zero and standard varieties also warrants caution. While they are calorie-free, there is insufficient evidence that they aid in weight loss and some studies suggest they may increase cravings for sweet foods. Furthermore, many Brisk products contain artificial food dyes like Red 40 and Yellow 5, which are unnecessary additives.

Making a Healthier Beverage Choice

Ultimately, if your goal is to reduce your sugar intake and improve your overall health, neither Brisk nor soda is a good option. The marketing of Brisk as a tea doesn't make it a truly healthy alternative. Instead, consider genuinely healthy alternatives:

  • Unsweetened Tea: Whether hot or iced, unsweetened tea provides antioxidants and other health benefits without added sugar or artificial ingredients. Flavors can be added naturally with lemon or mint.
  • Infused Water: Add sliced fruits (lemon, cucumber, berries) or herbs (mint, basil) to plain water for flavor without calories or sweeteners.
  • Seltzer with Juice: Mix plain seltzer or carbonated water with a splash of 100% fruit juice for a fizzy, flavorful drink with far less sugar than traditional sodas.
  • Plain Water: The simplest and healthiest choice for hydration. Adding a squirt of lemon or lime provides extra flavor.

It's important to read labels and be aware of hidden sugars and artificial ingredients in all packaged beverages. The American Heart Association journal Stroke has linked green tea consumption to lower stroke risks, highlighting the benefits of natural, unsweetened tea.

Conclusion

In the battle of Brisk versus soda, Brisk is not a clear winner from a health perspective. While it may sometimes contain slightly less sugar and fewer calories than certain sodas, its reliance on high fructose corn syrup and other artificial ingredients means it carries many of the same health risks associated with sugary beverages. Consumers should not be swayed by clever marketing that positions Brisk as a healthy alternative. For true health benefits, opting for unsweetened tea, infused water, or other low-sugar drinks is the best strategy. Both Brisk and soda should be viewed as occasional treats rather than daily beverages.

Frequently Asked Questions

While the tea base itself contains antioxidants, the high levels of added sugar, high fructose corn syrup, and other artificial ingredients in Brisk effectively cancel out any potential health benefits from the tea leaves.

Yes, most Brisk varieties are sweetened with high fructose corn syrup, a primary sweetener also used in many traditional sodas.

Brisk Zero Sugar removes the added sugar and calories but replaces them with artificial sweeteners like sucralose. Some research suggests artificial sweeteners may not aid in weight loss and could increase cravings for sweet foods, so it's not a truly 'healthy' choice.

Yes, ingredient lists for several Brisk varieties, such as Lemon and Sweet Tea, show that they contain phosphoric acid, an additive also commonly found in sodas.

Both beverages contribute to a high added sugar intake, which increases the risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

The perception that Brisk is healthier often comes from its 'iced tea' label, which creates a 'health halo' in the minds of consumers. However, its ingredient profile is closer to that of a typical sugary soda.

For a truly healthy beverage, opt for unsweetened iced tea, water infused with fruits or herbs, or plain water. These options provide hydration and potential health benefits without the added sugars and artificial ingredients.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.