Skip to content

Is Flake Fish Bad for You? Separating Fact from Fishy Fiction

4 min read

In Australia, where flake has been a fish and chip staple for decades, studies have recently raised health concerns. The question, 'Is flake fish bad for you?' has become increasingly relevant due to potential health risks, most notably mercury content, as well as sustainability and mislabeling issues.

Quick Summary

Flake fish, primarily small shark species like gummy shark, carries risks such as mercury contamination and mislabeling with endangered species. While it offers nutritional benefits, caution and moderation are advised, particularly for vulnerable populations, necessitating knowledge of its origins.

Key Points

  • Mercury Risk: Flake fish, which is shark meat, contains higher levels of mercury than many other fish due to bioaccumulation, posing risks, especially for pregnant women and children.

  • Mislabelling Concerns: A significant portion of fish sold as 'flake' is not sustainable gummy shark, but can include endangered or threatened shark species.

  • Nutritional Value: Flake is a source of lean protein and healthy omega-3 fatty acids, but its nutritional profile is impacted by preparation methods like deep frying.

  • Moderate Consumption: Health authorities advise limiting consumption of high-mercury fish like flake; occasional intake is acceptable for most, but regular consumption is discouraged.

  • Sustainable Alternatives: Consumers can choose lower-mercury, more sustainable fish alternatives such as whiting, salmon, and sardines to mitigate health risks and environmental impact.

  • Ask About Sourcing: To ensure you are not consuming threatened species, it is recommended to ask fishmongers for the specific species and origin of the 'flake'.

In This Article

What Exactly Is "Flake Fish"?

Before determining if flake fish is bad for you, it is crucial to understand what this term represents. In Australia, the name "flake" is a colloquial term for the boneless flesh of small, edible shark species. The most common species sold as flake is the Gummy Shark (Mustelus antarcticus), though mislabeling is a widespread issue. The mild flavor and flaky texture have made it a popular choice for traditional fish and chips. Sharks, being cartilaginous fish, lack bones, which is another reason for its popularity.

The Primary Health Risk: Mercury Contamination

One of the most significant health concerns associated with flake fish is its potential for high mercury content. This risk is directly linked to the fact that sharks are apex predators in the marine food chain.

  • Bioaccumulation: As large, predatory fish, sharks consume smaller fish over their long lifespan, causing mercury to accumulate in their flesh. This process, known as bioaccumulation, means the mercury levels can become significantly higher in sharks than in smaller, non-predatory fish.
  • Impact on Human Health: When humans consume high-mercury fish like flake, they also absorb these harmful chemicals. High levels of mercury exposure can lead to neurological damage and other serious health problems. While moderate consumption is generally considered safe for most adults, health authorities advise limiting intake.
  • Vulnerable Populations: The risks are particularly pronounced for pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and young children, as mercury can impair brain and nervous system development in unborn babies and infants.

Mislabelling and Endangered Species

Another disturbing aspect of the flake fish industry is the issue of mislabeling. Studies have shown that a significant portion of fish sold as 'flake' in Australian fish and chip shops is not the sustainable gummy shark. Instead, it is sometimes found to be threatened or even critically endangered species.

  • A DNA analysis of 'flake fillets' in South Australia revealed that almost 20% of samples were from critically endangered school shark.
  • The practice of using imported and endangered shark species undermines sustainability efforts and deceives consumers about their environmental impact.

Nutritional Profile of Flake Fish

Despite the risks, flake fish does offer some nutritional benefits. It is a good source of protein, and like other fish, contains healthy omega-3 fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals.

  • Omega-3s: Essential for brain and heart health.
  • Protein: High-quality and lean.
  • Vitamins: Rich in B vitamins, including B12, and vitamin D.
  • Preparation Method: It's worth noting that the healthiness of flake depends heavily on its preparation. Deep-fried flake has a much higher calorie and fat count than grilled flake.

Comparison: Flake Fish vs. Lower-Mercury Alternatives

Feature Flake Fish (Shark) Lower-Mercury Fish (e.g., Salmon, Whiting, Sardines)
Mercury Content Generally higher due to its position as a large, predatory fish. Significantly lower levels, especially in smaller species.
Sustainability Varies widely; often associated with mislabeling and unsustainable practices involving threatened species. Often better managed, with clearer labeling and more sustainable options widely available.
Omega-3s Contains omega-3 fatty acids. Excellent source of heart-healthy omega-3s.
Source Identification Difficult to verify the exact species and origin due to widespread mislabeling. Clearer labeling standards make it easier to trace the species and its origin.
Consumer Advice Limit consumption, especially for pregnant women, children, and those eating it frequently. Recommended for regular consumption as part of a healthy diet.

Making Safer Seafood Choices

Given the potential health and environmental concerns, making informed decisions about seafood is essential. A simple list can help guide consumers:

  • Choose Wisely: Opt for fish species that are known to have lower mercury levels and are sustainably sourced.
  • Ask Questions: When buying "flake," ask your fishmonger what species of shark it is and where it came from to ensure it is the more sustainable Gummy Shark.
  • Diversify Your Diet: Incorporating a variety of lower-mercury seafood, such as sardines, mackerel, and salmon, ensures you still get the benefits of fish without excessive mercury exposure.
  • Stay Informed: For those interested in sustainable fishing practices and avoiding endangered species, resources like the Australian Marine Conservation Society provide valuable guidance.

Conclusion

The question, "is flake fish bad for you?" doesn't have a simple yes or no answer. It is a nuanced issue involving significant health and environmental considerations. While flake (typically shark) offers nutritional benefits, its higher mercury content and the widespread problem of mislabeling pose risks that are particularly concerning for vulnerable groups like pregnant women and children. Consumers should exercise caution and practice moderation when consuming flake, and prioritize seeking out lower-mercury alternatives and sustainably sourced seafood options for a healthier and more environmentally conscious diet. The evidence suggests that for most people, occasional consumption is likely safe, but regular intake is not recommended.

Australian Marine Conservation Society

Frequently Asked Questions

Flake fish is sometimes considered unhealthy because, as shark meat, it can contain higher levels of mercury. This heavy metal accumulates in the flesh of large, predatory fish over their lifespan, and consuming it can have adverse health effects, particularly with frequent intake.

No, not all flake fish carries the same level of mercury risk. The primary species sold as flake, the gummy shark, generally contains less mercury than larger, longer-lived shark species. However, widespread mislabeling means you may unknowingly consume a higher-mercury species.

Health authorities advise pregnant women to limit their intake of flake (shark) due to its high mercury content.

It is very difficult for a consumer to tell if flake is mislabeled. Studies have used DNA testing to uncover the issue. The best approach is to buy from a reputable source, ask the fishmonger about the specific species and origin, and consider lower-mercury alternatives.

Yes, flake fish is a good source of lean protein and contains beneficial omega-3 fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals. However, these benefits must be balanced against the potential risks from mercury and other contaminants.

Excellent low-mercury fish alternatives include Atlantic salmon, canned tuna (especially light), sardines, mackerel, snapper, and whiting.

No, cooking flake fish does not reduce its mercury content. Mercury is a heavy metal that is bound to the fish's flesh and is not affected by heat. The risk level depends on the type of fish and its source.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.