Skip to content

Is sweetened condensed milk worse than sugar? A nutritional deep dive

4 min read

According to the American Heart Association, the average American adult consumes far more added sugar than is recommended, making the debate around sweeteners like sweetened condensed milk versus table sugar highly relevant. But is sweetened condensed milk worse than sugar when it comes to overall health?

Quick Summary

Sweetened condensed milk contains concentrated milk solids, high levels of added sugar, and saturated fat, making it significantly more calorie-dense than pure granulated sugar. While it offers trace nutrients, its high sugar and fat content presents greater health risks, like weight gain and diabetes, compared to an equal amount of sugar alone.

Key Points

  • Calorie Density: Per tablespoon, sweetened condensed milk has more calories than granulated sugar due to its concentrated milk solids and fat content.

  • Nutrient Profile: Sugar is empty calories, while condensed milk offers trace protein, calcium, and vitamins; however, its benefits are outweighed by high fat and sugar levels.

  • Saturated Fat: Sweetened condensed milk contains saturated fat, a risk factor for heart disease that is not present in pure granulated sugar.

  • Added Sugar Content: Condensed milk is approximately 40-45% sugar by weight, contributing significantly to daily added sugar intake recommendations.

  • Lactose Factor: As a dairy product, condensed milk is unsuitable for individuals with lactose intolerance, an issue not associated with pure sugar.

  • Moderation is Key: Both sweeteners are best consumed in small, measured portions as part of an otherwise balanced diet, with healthier alternatives always being the better option.

In This Article

Sweetened Condensed Milk vs. Sugar: Defining the Differences

On the surface, both sweetened condensed milk and sugar are potent sources of sweetness. However, their fundamental makeup and nutritional profiles are vastly different. Understanding these differences is the first step to making an informed choice for your diet.

What is Sweetened Condensed Milk?

Sweetened condensed milk is a product made by heating cow's milk to remove about 60% of its water content, and then adding a large amount of sugar before canning. This process results in a thick, sticky, and highly concentrated liquid with a creamy texture and very long shelf life. The high sugar concentration acts as a preservative, preventing microbial growth. While it contains some protein, fat, and minerals from the original milk, its nutritional value is largely overshadowed by its high caloric and sugar content.

What is Sugar?

Granulated table sugar, or sucrose, is a simple carbohydrate derived from sugar cane or sugar beets. It provides quick energy but contains no other nutrients—it is essentially 'empty calories'. When comparing equal serving sizes, a tablespoon of sugar is significantly less calorie-dense than a tablespoon of sweetened condensed milk, containing about 49 calories compared to condensed milk's 62 to 90 calories per tablespoon.

A Closer Look at the Nutritional Comparison

To truly understand the health implications, a side-by-side comparison of the nutritional facts is crucial. The following table illustrates the key differences between equal serving sizes of sweetened condensed milk and granulated sugar.

Nutritional Aspect Sweetened Condensed Milk (per 1 tbsp) Granulated Sugar (per 1 tbsp)
Calories ~62–90 kcal ~49 kcal
Carbohydrates ~15 g (from lactose and added sugar) ~13 g (from sucrose)
Added Sugars High, typically ~40–45% of total product 100% added sugar
Fat ~2–3 g (mostly saturated) 0 g
Protein ~1.5–2 g 0 g
Vitamins Some (e.g., A, B12, D) None
Minerals Some (e.g., Calcium, Phosphorus) None

Health Implications and Risks

While excessive consumption of any form of sugar is detrimental to health, the extra components in sweetened condensed milk introduce additional risks that plain sugar does not carry. Both contribute to weight gain and blood sugar spikes, but sweetened condensed milk carries the baggage of high saturated fat and lactose.

The Dangers of Excess Sugar

  • Weight Gain: Both products are calorie-dense, and the body stores excess calories as fat. The liquid calories from condensed milk can be less satiating, potentially leading to overconsumption.
  • Type 2 Diabetes: High intake of added sugars, in any form, can lead to insulin resistance over time, increasing the risk of developing type 2 diabetes.
  • Cardiovascular Disease: Excess sugar, and specifically the added saturated fat in sweetened condensed milk, can raise cholesterol and blood pressure, contributing to heart disease risk.
  • Tooth Decay: Sugars feed bacteria in the mouth, leading to increased risk of dental caries and tooth decay.

The Added Risks of Condensed Milk

  • Higher Caloric Density: Due to its fat and concentrated milk content, a tablespoon of condensed milk packs more calories than a tablespoon of pure sugar. For those watching their weight, this can pose a greater challenge to portion control.
  • Saturated Fat Content: The saturated fat in condensed milk, especially in regular versions, is linked to elevated LDL ('bad') cholesterol levels. This is a risk not present in pure granulated sugar.
  • Lactose Intolerance: Sweetened condensed milk is a dairy product and contains lactose. People who are lactose intolerant will experience symptoms like bloating and gas when consuming it, which is not an issue with pure sugar.

Practical Recommendations for a Balanced Diet

It is important to remember that neither sweetened condensed milk nor table sugar should be staples in a healthy diet. Both should be used in moderation as occasional treats or for specific culinary purposes. When choosing between the two, the context and total nutritional impact matter most.

  • For desserts: Sweetened condensed milk can add richness and a creamy texture that sugar alone cannot provide. If using it in a recipe, be mindful of the added fat and sugar and practice smaller portioning.
  • For beverages and flavor: If you simply need to add a touch of sweetness, a small amount of sugar may be the lesser of two evils, as it avoids the saturated fat and extra calories. However, healthier alternatives like natural fruit or unsweetened spices are always preferable.
  • Read labels carefully: Some commercially produced condensed milk may contain vegetable fats or other additives instead of pure milk and sugar. Always check the ingredient list to avoid less healthy substitutes.

Ultimately, the question isn't which is "worse," but which is the appropriate choice for your specific health goals, with the understanding that both should be consumed sparingly. For a comprehensive guide on managing sugar intake, visit the Illinois Extension's nutritional resources.

Conclusion: Making the Healthiest Choice

While both sweetened condensed milk and pure sugar are forms of added sweetener that should be limited, condensed milk presents a greater density of calories and saturated fat per serving. The presence of trace nutrients does not redeem its high sugar and fat load. When evaluating which to use, consider the total nutritional impact and your dietary needs. For most people, the decision should be about finding healthier alternatives to reduce overall intake of added sugars and unhealthy fats.


Frequently Asked Questions

Sweetened condensed milk contains some vitamins, minerals, and protein derived from its milk content, such as calcium, phosphorus, and vitamin B12. However, these potential benefits are far outweighed by its extremely high levels of sugar and saturated fat, making it an unhealthy choice for regular consumption.

Per tablespoon, sweetened condensed milk is more calorie-dense than sugar due to its added fat and concentrated milk. Therefore, consuming an equivalent amount could lead to greater weight gain. Both contribute to weight gain when consumed in excess.

Both sugar and sweetened condensed milk cause significant spikes in blood sugar. Condensed milk, due to its higher overall carbohydrate content per serving and higher glycemic index, can have a strong impact. Long-term, high intake of either can increase the risk of type 2 diabetes.

No, sweetened condensed milk is not an appropriate substitute for evaporated milk, as the two are nutritionally distinct. Evaporated milk is unsweetened and has a lower calorie count, while condensed milk is very sweet and thick due to added sugar.

Yes, some manufacturers offer low-fat and fat-free versions of sweetened condensed milk, which can reduce the saturated fat content. However, these versions remain high in added sugar and should still be consumed in moderation.

Healthier alternatives include natural sweeteners in their whole food form, like fresh fruit or dates. When sweetening beverages, options like stevia or monk fruit extract can be used. For creamy texture in desserts, alternatives like pureed bananas or avocados may work, depending on the recipe.

The key takeaway is that both should be limited in a healthy diet. While sugar provides empty calories, sweetened condensed milk adds the extra burden of saturated fat and concentrated calories. The "worse" option depends on your specific health concerns, but a reduction of all added sugars is the best health strategy.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.