Skip to content

Nutrition Diet: Are Chick-fil-A fries bad now?

5 min read

In early 2025, Chick-fil-A made a "slight adjustment" to its iconic Waffle Potato Fries recipe, adding a pea starch coating to improve crispiness. However, the change sparked significant customer backlash, with many asking, "Are Chick-fil-A fries bad now?".

Quick Summary

Chick-fil-A's 2025 waffle fry recipe update, including pea starch for crispiness, sparked widespread customer dissatisfaction over flavor and texture. The change also poses risks for individuals with legume allergies, adding a significant concern beyond just taste preference.

Key Points

  • Recipe Change: In early 2025, Chick-fil-A added a pea starch coating to its waffle fries to increase crispiness, fundamentally altering the recipe.

  • Customer Backlash: The recipe change was met with widespread negative feedback from customers who disliked the new, often-described-as-bland and dry, taste and texture.

  • Allergy Risk: The inclusion of pea starch has created a health concern for individuals with pea or other legume allergies, making the fries inaccessible for this group.

  • General Fast Food Concerns: Like all fried fast food, Chick-fil-A's fries remain high in calories and fat, contributing to overall health risks with frequent consumption.

  • Moderation is Key: The nutritional impact of the fries depends on consumption frequency, and healthier menu alternatives are available at Chick-fil-A.

  • Transparency Issues: The incident highlighted public demand for greater transparency from fast-food chains when altering signature menu items, especially with new ingredients that pose allergy risks.

In This Article

The Controversial Recipe Change

For years, Chick-fil-A’s Waffle Potato Fries held an almost iconic status among fast-food enthusiasts, prized for their unique shape, earthy potato flavor, and perfect balance of softness and crispiness. However, at the beginning of 2025, the company confirmed it had made a minor adjustment to its signature fries. The most notable change was the addition of a pea starch coating, intended to keep the fries crispy for a longer duration. While the company claimed the fries maintained the "same great taste," the public reaction told a different story entirely.

Social media platforms were flooded with complaints from long-time patrons expressing their dismay. Terms like "terrible," "sooo gross," and "inedible" became common descriptions of the new version. Many customers lamented the loss of the old flavor, noting the new fries tasted dry, stale, or like generic, store-bought frozen fries. The backlash was so strong that it drew comparisons to the infamous "New Coke" debacle of the 1980s, with some fans begging the company to revert to the original recipe.

The Impact on Taste and Texture

The most immediate effect of the recipe change was the alteration of the fries' flavor and texture profile. Where the old fries were known for a softer, more traditional potato-forward taste, the new coating resulted in a different mouthfeel and overall experience. According to customer reports:

  • Loss of Flavor: The buttery, earthy potato taste that fans loved has reportedly been significantly muted, replaced with a blander, salt-forward profile.
  • Inconsistent Crispiness: While the pea starch was intended to improve crispiness, many customers described the new texture as unnaturally hard or batter-like, rather than a natural, crispy potato exterior.
  • Dryness: The new fries are frequently described as dry and lacking the satisfying internal softness that characterized the original.

Nutrition and Health Considerations

Beyond the subjective matter of taste, the recipe change and the nature of fast-food fries raise important nutritional and dietary considerations. While fries are an indulgent treat, understanding their place in a balanced diet is crucial. The following table compares the old fries (based on historical data) with the new version, acknowledging that specific nutritional changes due to pea starch are minimal but other health factors remain relevant.

Feature Old Waffle Fries (Pre-2025) New Waffle Fries (2025)
Primary Goal Balanced flavor and texture Enhanced, longer-lasting crispiness
Coating Minimal coating Includes pea starch coating
Taste (General Opinion) Earthy, buttery, natural potato flavor Bland, dry, generic, less potato-forward flavor
Texture (General Opinion) Soft, pliant interior with crispy edges Harder, almost batter-like crunch; less fluffy interior
Allergy Risk Low risk for pea/legume allergies Contains pea starch, a risk for pea and legume allergy sufferers

It is also important to consider the broader health profile of any fried food. The Cleveland Clinic highlights several health risks associated with a high consumption of fried foods, which apply to both versions of Chick-fil-A's fries:

  • High Calories and Fat: Frying food in oil significantly increases its calorie and fat content. For example, a medium order of waffle fries has around 360 calories and 17g of fat.
  • Inflammation: The high heat used for frying can release free radicals that cause oxidative stress and inflammation in the body, contributing to chronic disease risk.
  • Heart Health: Regular intake of fried foods, particularly those with saturated and trans fats, is linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, heart attack, and stroke.

The Allergic Reaction Risk

The most serious consequence of the recipe change is the introduction of a new allergen. Although Chick-fil-A stated the new recipe does not contain any of the nine major allergens, the addition of pea starch is a major issue for a specific group of customers. Pea allergies, and broader legume allergies, have been on the rise, and pea starch is a pea derivative that can trigger a reaction.

This change effectively removes a previously safe menu option for many people, especially children with legume allergies, leaving them unable to eat the fries and potentially concerned about cross-contamination. This incident underscores the importance of transparency in the food industry when making ingredient changes, even to a seemingly minor component like a potato coating.

Are They "Bad" Now? A Concluding Perspective

Whether the fries are now "bad" is subjective and depends on individual priorities. From a purely nutritional standpoint, fried foods are an indulgence, and the new recipe doesn't fundamentally change that. However, the customer experience has undoubtedly worsened for many, with a noticeable decline in perceived quality, flavor, and texture. For individuals with legume allergies, the change has made the fries, and potentially the entire restaurant, a no-go zone due to the allergy risk.

So, while not necessarily "worse" from a calorie count perspective, the fries are unquestionably different and, for a large segment of the population, inferior in taste. When considering fast-food choices, moderation and ingredient awareness are always key. You can find more information about fast food ingredients and allergy safety from reputable sources like the Food Allergy Research & Education (FARE) website. The public's overwhelming negative response serves as a strong reminder that for many, the quality and taste of a beloved item can be more important than minor improvements in food-holding technology.

How to Make a Healthier Fast Food Choice

  • Substitute Sides: Choose a side salad, fruit cup, or grilled chicken nuggets instead of fried options to significantly reduce calorie and fat intake.
  • Modify your Order: Request sauces on the side to control how much you use, as they can be high in sugar and fat.
  • Consider a Smaller Portion: Opt for a small side of fries rather than a medium or large to reduce overall consumption.
  • Stay Hydrated with Water: Skip sugary sodas and lemonades, which add empty calories, and stick with water.
  • Make it at Home: For a healthier alternative, try making your own baked or air-fried waffle fries at home using ingredients like olive oil and your preferred seasoning blend.

Ultimately, the choice to continue purchasing Chick-fil-A fries comes down to personal taste and dietary needs. For many, the original flavor is missed, and the new version simply doesn't measure up.

Frequently Asked Questions

In early 2025, Chick-fil-A added a pea starch coating to its Waffle Potato Fries to help them stay crispier for longer.

Many customers have expressed dissatisfaction with the new taste and texture, describing the fries as bland, dry, and less flavorful than the original recipe.

Yes, for individuals with pea or other legume allergies, the addition of pea starch poses a significant health risk, making the fries unsafe for them to eat.

The core nutritional profile of the fried potatoes likely remains similar, but the most significant change is the presence of a new ingredient (pea starch) that impacts taste and can trigger allergies.

Fast-food fries are typically high in calories, unhealthy fats, and sodium. Regular consumption is linked to inflammation, weight gain, and an increased risk of heart disease.

Chick-fil-A has acknowledged making the recipe adjustment but claims the fries offer the "same great taste" despite widespread customer complaints online.

For those concerned about nutrition or allergies, healthier options include the side salad, fruit cup, or grilled chicken nuggets.

While Chick-fil-A uses canola oil for its fries, some earlier changes involved switching from peanut oil for fries over a decade ago. The recent recipe change involved the coating, not the oil.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.