Skip to content

Nutrition Diet: Are Life Savers Healthy for You?

4 min read

According to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), standard fruity Life Savers are classified as an unhealthy ultra-processed food. This raises the critical question for anyone mindful of their dietary choices: Are Life Savers healthy, and what impact do they really have on your nutrition?

Quick Summary

This article examines the nutritional content and health implications of both regular and sugar-free Life Savers. It highlights concerns about high sugar, artificial additives, and dental risks, while also exploring the pros and cons of sugar-free versions. The piece provides a comparison and suggests healthier food alternatives.

Key Points

  • Regular Life Savers contain empty calories: Standard hard candies offer no nutritional value beyond sugar and corn syrup.

  • Life Savers are ultra-processed: The Environmental Working Group classifies them as an unhealthy, ultra-processed food linked to potential health risks.

  • Sugar-free doesn't mean risk-free: While sugar-free versions cut sugar, they rely on artificial sweeteners and sugar alcohols that can have side effects.

  • Both regular and sugar-free hard candies threaten dental health: Prolonged exposure to sugar or acid from hard candies increases the risk of tooth decay and chipping.

  • Healthier alternatives are widely available: Options like fresh fruit, dark chocolate, and homemade treats offer natural sweetness with nutritional benefits.

  • Moderation is essential: Incorporate treats like candy infrequently and in small portions to maintain a healthy and balanced diet.

In This Article

A crucial part of any balanced nutrition diet is understanding the foods we consume, especially treats like candy. While a small piece of candy might seem harmless, a closer look at the ingredients and processing reveals the full picture. The primary health concern with standard hard candies like Life Savers is their composition, which is largely comprised of empty calories and added sugars.

The Unsweetened Truth About Regular Life Savers

Regular Life Savers hard candies are primarily made from sugar and corn syrup. A typical serving of five-flavor hard candies contains 12 grams of total sugar, all of which are added sugars. For context, this is equivalent to about 3 teaspoons of sugar per serving, contributing significantly to your daily intake without offering any nutritional value such as protein, fiber, or vitamins.

Impact on Overall Health

  • High Added Sugar Intake: Excessive consumption of added sugars is linked to a higher risk of serious health problems, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and mental health issues. The World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stress the importance of limiting free sugar intake to prevent chronic noncommunicable diseases.
  • Ultra-Processed Classification: The Environmental Working Group (EWG) classifies Life Savers as ultra-processed, a category of foods that undergo significant industrial processing and are often associated with negative health outcomes.

The Lowdown on Sugar-Free Life Savers

For those managing their sugar intake, particularly individuals with diabetes, sugar-free candies like Wint-O-Green Life Savers seem like a better choice. However, 'sugar-free' does not mean 'calorie-free' or 'risk-free'.

Potential Issues with Sugar-Free Hard Candy

  • Artificial Sweeteners: Sugar-free Life Savers use artificial sweeteners like aspartame, sucralose, and sugar alcohols (e.g., isomalt, sorbitol) to provide sweetness without sugar. While often considered safe, some studies suggest potential links between artificial sweeteners and health issues, such as changes in gut bacteria, metabolic disturbances, and other effects, though more long-term research is needed.
  • Gastrointestinal Distress: Sugar alcohols, common in sugar-free candies, can cause stomach upset, gas, bloating, or have a laxative effect if consumed in large quantities.
  • Dental Concerns: Although artificial sweeteners do not cause tooth decay, sugar-free hard candies can still pose risks to dental health. Prolonged sucking on hard candies, whether sugary or sugar-free, exposes teeth to acids (from flavorings or produced by bacteria) and can lead to chipped or cracked teeth.

The Dental Dilemma: Hard Candy and Your Teeth

Beyond general nutrition, hard candies present a specific threat to dental health. Unlike chocolate, which dissolves relatively quickly, hard candies linger in the mouth, bathing teeth in sugar or acid for extended periods. This creates an ideal environment for cavity-causing bacteria to thrive.

  • Prolonged Sugar Exposure: Bacteria in the mouth feed on sugar and produce acids that erode tooth enamel. With hard candy, this process is prolonged, leading to higher risk of decay.
  • Risk of Chipping: The temptation to bite down on a hard candy can result in chipped, cracked, or broken teeth, potentially damaging existing dental work like fillings or crowns.

Healthier Alternatives to Satisfy Your Sweet Tooth

If you're looking for a healthier way to curb your sweet cravings, several nutritious alternatives offer flavor without the drawbacks of processed candy. The key is to choose whole foods that provide fiber, vitamins, and other beneficial nutrients.

  • Fresh or Frozen Fruit: Naturally sweet and nutrient-dense, fruits like berries, mangoes, and grapes are excellent substitutes. Frozen grapes can mimic the satisfying texture of hard candy.
  • Dark Chocolate (70%+): High-cocoa dark chocolate contains less sugar than milk chocolate and is rich in antioxidants. Enjoying a small square can satisfy cravings.
  • Dates with Nuts or Nut Butter: Dates are naturally sweet and can be paired with protein and fiber-rich nuts or nut butter for a filling, decadent treat.
  • Homemade Fruit Leather or Energy Balls: Creating your own treats with dried fruit, nuts, and seeds allows you to control the ingredients and avoid unnecessary additives.
  • Sugar-Free Gum or Xylitol Mints: Chewing sugar-free gum or using xylitol-based mints can help satisfy a sweet craving while also promoting dental health by stimulating saliva production.

Comparison Table: Regular vs. Sugar-Free Life Savers vs. Healthy Alternative

Feature Regular Life Savers (5 Flavors) Sugar-Free Life Savers (Wint-O-Green) Healthy Alternative (e.g., Berries)
Calories ~15 kcal per candy ~3 kcal per mint Variable, but low
Added Sugar ~3g per candy 0g 0g (natural sugars)
Primary Sweetener Sugar, Corn Syrup Sugar Alcohols, Artificial Sweeteners Fructose (Natural)
Nutritional Value No protein, fiber, or vitamins No protein, fiber, or vitamins Vitamins, minerals, fiber, and antioxidants
Dental Risk High, from prolonged sugar exposure and potential for chipping Moderate, from acidity and chipping risk Low, promotes saliva production and is less acidic
Processed Status Ultra-processed food Moderately processed Minimally processed whole food

Conclusion

Ultimately, the question, "Are Life Savers healthy?" is best answered by recognizing their status as a non-nutritious, ultra-processed food. While the sugar-free varieties reduce sugar intake, they are not a truly 'healthy' food and carry their own set of potential issues, from gastrointestinal discomfort to concerns over artificial sweeteners. For optimal nutrition and health, focusing on whole-food alternatives like fresh fruit or high-cocoa dark chocolate is a far superior strategy for satisfying sweet cravings. Enjoying hard candy, whether regular or sugar-free, should be viewed as an occasional indulgence rather than a regular part of a balanced diet.

For further reading on the impact of diet on lifelong health, consider this resource from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: CDC on Healthy Eating.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sugar-free Life Savers can be consumed by diabetics, but still contain carbohydrates and calories that can affect blood sugar levels. They are not a 'free pass' for sweets and should be counted in your overall diet plan.

Hard candies are damaging to teeth because they dissolve slowly, bathing teeth in sugar or acid for extended periods. This feeds bacteria that cause tooth decay and increases the risk of chipping or cracking teeth.

Some artificial sweeteners and sugar alcohols found in sugar-free candies can cause gastrointestinal issues like bloating, gas, or diarrhea, especially when consumed in large amounts.

Yes, Life Savers are considered a type of junk food. The Environmental Working Group classifies them as an unhealthy ultra-processed food because they are high in sugar and calories with no significant nutritional benefits.

Healthier alternatives include fresh or frozen fruit (like berries or grapes), a small square of dark chocolate (70%+ cocoa), or a handful of nuts.

Yes, you can have candy on a healthy diet, but moderation is key. It should be an occasional treat in a portion-controlled amount, not a regular item. The bulk of your diet should consist of nutrient-dense, whole foods.

'Empty calories' refers to calories that provide energy but offer little to no nutritional value like vitamins, minerals, or fiber. Life Savers are a concentrated source of empty calories from added sugars.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.