Skip to content

Stevia or Sweet N Low for Diabetics: Which Sweetener is Better?

6 min read

According to the American Diabetes Association, both purified stevia and saccharin (the key ingredient in Sweet N Low) are generally considered safe for diabetics when used in moderation within daily limits. But for individuals managing their blood sugar, the question remains: which is better for diabetics, stevia or sweet n low?

Quick Summary

This article compares stevia and Sweet N Low, examining their differing origins, potential effects on blood sugar, taste profiles, and long-term health implications for diabetics.

Key Points

  • Natural vs. Artificial: Stevia is plant-derived, while Sweet 'N Low uses synthetic saccharin, offering different origins for consideration.

  • Blood Sugar Impact: Both have minimal direct effect on blood sugar, but some studies suggest stevia might offer additional benefits for glucose tolerance.

  • Aftertaste Profile: Stevia may have a lingering, licorice-like aftertaste, whereas Sweet 'N Low is often associated with a metallic note.

  • Additives are Crucial: Many powdered versions of both sweeteners contain fillers like dextrose or sugar alcohols that can affect blood glucose or cause digestive issues.

  • Safety & Research: Both are FDA-approved for moderate consumption, but newer research on artificial sweeteners' long-term effects on gut health warrants attention.

  • Moderation is Key: Regardless of the sweetener chosen, using it in moderation within a balanced diet is the most effective approach for managing diabetes.

In This Article

Understanding Stevia for Diabetics

Stevia is a natural, non-nutritive sweetener derived from the stevia plant native to South America. Its intensely sweet compounds, known as steviol glycosides, are extracted and purified for use in commercial products. Since it contains no carbohydrates and virtually no calories, high-purity stevia has no direct impact on blood glucose levels. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has classified these purified extracts as "Generally Recognized as Safe" (GRAS).

Potential Benefits and Considerations

  • Blood Sugar Control: Some studies suggest that pure stevia may not only avoid raising blood sugar but might also help lower glucose levels, potentially offering antidiabetic properties. The steviol compounds may stimulate insulin secretion in response to glucose.
  • Reduced Calorie Intake: By replacing caloric sugar, stevia can assist with weight management, a key component of effective diabetes control.
  • Antioxidant Properties: Early research has indicated that stevia may possess antioxidant potential.
  • Potential Aftertaste: Some people report a lingering, licorice-like aftertaste, which can affect preference.
  • Additives: It is crucial for diabetics to check the ingredient list of stevia products. Many commercial versions are bulked up with fillers like dextrose, erythritol, or other sugar alcohols that can potentially affect blood sugar or cause digestive issues like bloating and nausea.

Understanding Sweet 'N Low (Saccharin) for Diabetics

Sweet 'N Low is a brand name for a tabletop sweetener whose main active ingredient is saccharin, an artificial, non-nutritive sweetener. Saccharin is one of the oldest artificial sweeteners, with a sweetness intensity 300 to 400 times greater than sugar. Like stevia, it contains no calories and is not metabolized by the body, meaning it passes through the system without raising blood glucose levels.

Potential Concerns and Considerations

  • Gut Microbiome Alterations: Some research, particularly animal studies, suggests that artificial sweeteners like saccharin may alter gut microbiota, which could in turn affect glucose metabolism over time. The World Health Organization (WHO) has noted potential undesirable effects from long-term use.
  • Metallic Aftertaste: Saccharin is known to have a distinct bitter or metallic aftertaste, especially in higher concentrations.
  • Historical Controversy: In the 1970s, studies on rats linked saccharin to bladder cancer, leading to a warning label. Subsequent research found no clear link in humans, and the warning was removed in 2000.
  • Packet Ingredients: The carbohydrate content of Sweet 'N Low packets is mainly due to added fillers like dextrose. This can slightly affect blood sugar if consumed in large quantities, though a single packet has a negligible effect.

The Key Differences: Stevia vs. Sweet 'N Low

Feature Stevia (High-Purity Extract) Sweet 'N Low (Saccharin)
Origin Plant-derived, natural source Synthetic, artificial chemical
Key Ingredient Steviol glycosides Saccharin
Aftertaste Can have a lingering, licorice-like note Known for a distinct metallic aftertaste
Calorie Content Zero calories per serving (packet may have fillers) Zero calories per serving (packet contains dextrose)
Effect on Blood Sugar Minimal to no direct effect; some studies show potential benefits No direct effect; some newer research suggests potential indirect metabolic impacts
Impact on Gut Health Generally considered neutral; side effects often from added sugar alcohols Some research indicates potential negative impact on the gut microbiome

How to Choose the Right Sweetener for You

For diabetics, the choice between stevia and Sweet 'N Low often comes down to a few personalized factors. While both are considered safe for consumption in moderation, the key is to be an informed consumer and consider how each sweetener affects your unique body.

Prioritize Your Health Goals

If you prioritize a sweetener with a natural origin and potential additional health benefits, pure stevia extract is often the preferred choice. The evidence suggesting benefits for blood sugar control and insulin sensitivity makes it an appealing option. However, if your main focus is on a low-cost, widely available sweetener and you are not concerned by its artificial nature or taste profile, Sweet 'N Low is a reliable choice that has been used safely for decades.

Watch for Additives

It is essential to read the nutrition label carefully, especially for powdered products. The presence of dextrose or maltodextrin as bulking agents can slightly increase carbohydrate content. This is a common practice to make the product easier to measure and use. Opting for liquid forms of either sweetener can help avoid these fillers.

Assess Your Tolerance and Taste

Individual tolerance and taste preference play a significant role. Some people are sensitive to the aftertaste of stevia, while others dislike the metallic notes of saccharin. Experimenting with different sweeteners and brands can help you find one that works best for your palate. For some, a blend of sweeteners may provide a better overall taste.

Conclusion: Informed Choices and Moderation are Key

Ultimately, the choice between stevia or sweet n low is personal for diabetics. Both offer sugar-free options that can help manage carbohydrate and calorie intake, but they have key differences in origin, taste, and potential long-term effects. Stevia, in its pure form, stands out due to its natural source and promising research on potential metabolic benefits. Sweet 'N Low (saccharin) is a proven, inexpensive option but is artificial and may present long-term metabolic concerns according to some studies.

For a diabetic, the best approach is not to rely on any single sweetener as a magic bullet. Instead, use these products in moderation as part of a balanced diet rich in whole foods. Always consult a healthcare provider or dietitian when making significant changes to your diet to ensure it aligns with your overall diabetes management plan.

The Sweetener Decision

  • Stevia is a natural choice: Ideal for those who prefer plant-derived products and are intrigued by potential additional health benefits beyond zero calories.
  • Sweet 'N Low is a cost-effective choice: A long-standing, affordable artificial option for those unbothered by its synthetic nature or metallic aftertaste.
  • Moderation is paramount: Excessive consumption of any sweetener is not a healthy substitute for a balanced diet and overall sugar reduction.

Tips for Incorporating Sweeteners

  • Start with small amounts to gauge taste and tolerance.
  • Use liquid versions to avoid added carbohydrate fillers.
  • Check labels for additional sweeteners like erythritol or dextrose.
  • Consider taste—use stevia in hot tea and saccharin in coffee to find what suits you best.
  • Reduce overall reliance on sweet tastes to help recalibrate your palate over time.

Other Sweetener Alternatives

For those seeking alternatives, monk fruit extract is a popular natural, calorie-free option that has a clean taste. Sugar alcohols like erythritol also provide sweetness with minimal impact on blood glucose, though excessive intake can lead to digestive discomfort.

For reliable guidance on all aspects of diabetes, including dietary management, visit the American Diabetes Association at diabetes.org.

Comparison Table

Feature Stevia (Purified Extract) Sweet 'N Low (Saccharin)
Origin Plant-based, natural source Synthetic, artificial
Key Ingredient Steviol glycosides Saccharin
Taste Profile Can have a lingering, licorice-like aftertaste Known for a metallic or bitter aftertaste
Calories Zero per serving (excluding additives) Zero per serving (excluding additives)
Packet Additives Often erythritol or dextrose Often dextrose
Effect on Blood Sugar Minimal direct impact; some studies show possible benefits Minimal direct impact; some new research suggests potential gut-related effects
Heat Stability Generally high heat stability, good for cooking Fairly stable, but can lose some sweetness
Safety & Regulation FDA GRAS for purified extracts FDA-approved; long safety record with prior controversy

Conclusion

The choice between stevia and Sweet 'N Low for a diabetic depends on individual priorities, including preference for natural vs. artificial products, sensitivity to aftertaste, and personal health goals. While both are safe for moderated use, pure stevia offers a natural alternative with potentially more long-term health benefits, while Sweet 'N Low is a tried-and-true, widely available option. For effective management, either can be a useful tool when used sparingly and in the context of a healthy, balanced diet. It is always wise to read ingredient lists carefully and consult a healthcare professional for personalized dietary advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Purified stevia extracts, approved by the FDA, are generally safe for diabetics in moderation and do not raise blood sugar. However, some products contain additives like sugar alcohols, so always check the label for fillers.

Sweet 'N Low's primary sweetener, saccharin, does not directly raise blood sugar levels because the body does not metabolize it. However, packets often contain dextrose, which can slightly affect blood glucose in large amounts.

Taste is highly individual. Some find stevia's aftertaste unpleasant in coffee, while others dislike the metallic flavor of saccharin from Sweet 'N Low. Experimentation is the best way to determine personal preference.

Some studies, particularly in animals, have suggested that artificial sweeteners like saccharin may alter the gut microbiome, which could potentially affect glucose metabolism over time. This area requires further human research.

Replacing high-calorie sugar with low- or zero-calorie sweeteners can aid weight management by reducing overall calorie intake. However, it is not a standalone solution and should be part of a comprehensive dietary plan.

Yes, other alternatives include monk fruit extract, a natural option with no calories, and sugar alcohols like erythritol, which have minimal glycemic impact. Both should be used in moderation.

Stevia may have a more favorable long-term profile due to its natural origin and potential for positive metabolic effects. Concerns about artificial sweeteners' long-term impact on the gut microbiome make stevia a better choice for some, but moderation is always recommended.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.