From Modest Meals to 'Value' Offerings
A major factor in changing portion expectations is the food industry's shift towards leveraging volume as a selling point since the post-WWII era. By the 1970s, fast-food chains began offering "value sizing," increasing portions at low price points. Studies show many popular items grew significantly, some by 2 to 5 times. This practice linked quantity with value, making a 'regular' size seem 'small' and conditioning consumers to expect more. This competitive upselling led to 'portion distortion,' normalizing larger serving sizes.
The Psychological Triggers of Portion Creep
Beyond marketing, psychological factors also influence expectations. Visual cues like larger plates can make food appear smaller, prompting people to eat more. Dinner plates grew from 8–9 inches to 11–12 inches, impacting our perception of a sufficient meal. The "unit bias" causes people to see a single package as one portion, regardless of size. Snacking from large packages rather than single servings exacerbates this. Distracted or mindless eating also contributes, as people rely less on internal hunger cues and more on external ones like portion size.
Cultural Norms, Industry Practices, and Globalization
Cultural norms around hospitality have also shaped expectations, with generous portions often seen as a sign of abundance in many Western cultures. This contrasts with cultures like Japan, where meals feature smaller, diverse portions. Globalization has spread the Western emphasis on larger portions through fast food and processed snacks. Advances in food technology and agriculture have made producing large quantities of cheap, calorie-dense food economically viable, further driving demand for larger portions and altering eating habits.
The Health Consequences of Expanded Portions
Increased portion sizes are directly linked to rising overweight and obesity rates. Consuming larger portions consistently leads to increased calorie intake, even overriding the body's natural regulation. This caloric surplus raises the risk of chronic diseases like type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The health implications highlight the need to address portion distortion and educate consumers on appropriate serving sizes.
A Tale of Two Timelines: Portion Sizes Then and Now
| Food/Drink Item | Circa 1970s-1980s | Modern Day | Key Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bagel | 3 inches in diameter, 140 calories | 6 inches in diameter, 350+ calories | More than doubled in size and calories |
| Cheeseburger | Approx. 330 calories | 600-1000+ calories | Significantly larger, higher in calories |
| Fast-food soda | 6.5-7 ounces | 20-32 ounces or more | Quadrupled or quintupled in size |
| Snack bags | Single-serving size common | 'Family size' and jumbo packages are the norm | Standard unit size has grown substantially |
| Dinner Plate | 8-9 inches in diameter | 11-12 inches in diameter | Expanded visual cues encourage larger portions |
Breaking the Cycle of Portion Distortion
Reversing the trend requires addressing both consumer habits and industry practices:
- Use smaller plates: Leverage the Delboeuf illusion by using 9-inch plates instead of 12-inch ones.
- Measure before eating: Portion snacks from large packages into smaller containers.
- Practice mindful eating: Focus on your meal without distractions to better recognize hunger and fullness.
- Prioritize low energy-dense foods: Fill your plate with fruits and vegetables for satisfying portions without excess calories.
- Educate yourself: Understand the difference between nutrition label serving sizes and typical restaurant or store portions.
Conclusion: Reframing Our Expectations
Over the past 50 to 60 years, expectations for food and drink portions have shifted dramatically from modest to supersized. This change is due to marketing, food production, and cultural norms around abundance. The consequences include public health crises and altered eating habits. To move forward, individual and societal efforts are needed to redefine normal portions. Using smaller plates, practicing mindful eating, and resisting the 'value for volume' mindset can help align eating habits with biological needs. For more on the psychology of portion size, see the PMC article on Portion Size Psychology.