Skip to content

Understanding What Are Sugar Substitutes According to the FDA?

4 min read

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the regulatory body responsible for determining the safety of ingredients added to food, including the diverse range of products that fall under the umbrella of what are sugar substitutes according to the FDA. These substances are used to provide sweetness with fewer or no calories compared to regular sugar. Navigating the different categories and regulations can help consumers understand what they are consuming and how these alternatives are evaluated for safety.

Quick Summary

The FDA classifies sugar substitutes as food additives or Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) substances, each requiring a different level of review to ensure safety.

Key Points

  • FDA Approval Process: The FDA regulates sugar substitutes through either a formal food additive petition or a Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) determination.

  • High-Intensity Sweeteners: This category includes FDA-approved substances like aspartame, sucralose, and saccharin, which provide sweetness with few or no calories.

  • GRAS Status: Naturally-derived sweeteners such as highly purified stevia extracts and monk fruit extracts are considered GRAS by the FDA, based on expert consensus of their safety.

  • Sugar Alcohols: These are polyols like xylitol and erythritol, also considered GRAS, which contain fewer calories than sugar and don't promote tooth decay.

  • Safety Considerations: The FDA sets Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) levels and deems these sweeteners safe for the general population, though specific conditions like PKU or digestive sensitivity require caution.

  • Ongoing Monitoring: The FDA continues to review scientific evidence and reassess the safety of sweeteners in response to new research and petitions.

In This Article

FDA's Regulatory Framework for Sugar Substitutes

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates sugar substitutes through two primary pathways: the Food Additive approval process and the Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) process. For a new food additive, a manufacturer must submit a petition demonstrating its safety, after which the FDA establishes an acceptable daily intake (ADI). In contrast, a substance can be deemed GRAS if qualified experts widely agree, based on scientific evidence, that it is safe for its intended use, without requiring formal pre-market approval. This dual-track system ensures that all sweeteners are subject to rigorous safety standards before they can be used in the food supply. The FDA continues to monitor the latest scientific literature on sweeteners to ensure ongoing safety.

High-Intensity Sweeteners Approved as Food Additives

High-intensity sweeteners are many times sweeter than table sugar (sucrose), meaning only tiny amounts are needed to achieve the same sweetness, contributing few or no calories. The FDA has formally approved six high-intensity sweeteners as food additives. These include:

  • Saccharin: One of the oldest artificial sweeteners, ranging from 200 to 700 times sweeter than sugar. After initial safety concerns were debunked by extensive human studies, the warning label requirement was removed in 2000.
  • Acesulfame Potassium (Ace-K): Approximately 200 times sweeter than sugar, Ace-K is heat-stable and often used in combination with other sweeteners to create a more sugar-like taste.
  • Aspartame: Composed of two amino acids, it is about 200 times sweeter than sugar but loses its sweetness when heated. The FDA requires products with aspartame to carry a warning for individuals with phenylketonuria (PKU), who cannot metabolize the phenylalanine component.
  • Sucralose: A high-intensity sweetener around 600 times sweeter than sugar. It is heat-stable and can be used in baking.
  • Neotame: A derivative of aspartame, it is 7,000 to 13,000 times sweeter than sugar and is heat-stable. Because very little is needed, it does not require a warning label for people with PKU.
  • Advantame: The sweetest of all approved sweeteners, it is approximately 20,000 times sweeter than sugar and is also heat-stable.

High-Intensity Sweeteners with GRAS Status

Certain plant- and fruit-based high-intensity sweeteners have achieved GRAS status, meaning they do not undergo the food additive review process. The FDA has not questioned the safety conclusions for these substances under their intended conditions of use. These include:

  • Highly Purified Steviol Glycosides: Extracts from the leaves of the stevia plant, which are 200 to 400 times sweeter than sugar. The use of whole-leaf or crude stevia extracts, however, is not permitted by the FDA.
  • Monk Fruit Extracts (Luo Han Guo): Extracts from the monk fruit, a melon grown in southern China, that are 100 to 250 times sweeter than sugar.

The FDA and Sugar Alcohols (Polyols)

Sugar alcohols, or polyols, are another class of sweeteners that the FDA has determined to be generally recognized as safe (GRAS). Unlike high-intensity sweeteners, they are carbohydrates that contain some calories, though typically fewer than sugar. They are not fully absorbed by the body, which can lead to digestive discomfort if consumed in large quantities. Common examples end in '-tol' and include sorbitol, xylitol, erythritol, and maltitol.

Comparison Table of FDA-Regulated Sweeteners

Sweetener Category Examples FDA Status Caloric Content Sweetness (vs. Sugar) Heat Stability Common Uses
High-Intensity (Food Additive) Aspartame, Sucralose, Saccharin, Ace-K, Neotame, Advantame FDA-Approved Few or no calories 200-20,000x sweeter Varies (Aspartame is not) Diet sodas, tabletop packets, desserts, chewing gum
High-Intensity (GRAS) Highly Purified Stevia Extracts, Monk Fruit Extracts GRAS Few or no calories 100-400x sweeter Yes Baked goods, beverages, tabletop sweeteners
Sugar Alcohols (Polyols) Sorbitol, Xylitol, Erythritol, Maltitol GRAS Lower than sugar 25-100% sweeter Yes Sugar-free candies, gums, cookies

Potential Health Considerations and FDA Monitoring

While the FDA has repeatedly affirmed the safety of approved and GRAS sweeteners for the general population under specific usage conditions, some individuals and groups have raised health concerns. For example, the World Health Organization's IARC classified aspartame as a "possible carcinogen" in 2023, though the FDA has publicly disagreed with this assessment due to what it identified as scientific shortcomings in the studies used. This highlights the importance of ongoing scientific review and the potential for differing interpretations of data between health organizations.

For most people, the main potential side effect is the digestive upset that can occur with excessive consumption of sugar alcohols. For individuals with specific conditions like PKU, avoiding certain sweeteners is critical. The FDA's role involves continuous monitoring of safety data and providing guidance to the public.

Conclusion

According to the FDA, sugar substitutes encompass a wide array of ingredients that undergo a robust regulatory review process before entering the food supply. These alternatives are categorized based on their approval pathway—either as formally reviewed food additives or as substances deemed Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS). High-intensity sweeteners like sucralose and saccharin offer minimal to no calories, while sugar alcohols provide reduced-calorie options. While the FDA considers these products safe for the general population within acceptable daily intake levels, it is crucial for consumers to stay informed about potential individual sensitivities and new research findings. Ultimately, a balanced approach to sweetening foods, considering all available options under FDA guidance, is recommended.

For further information, please visit the official FDA resource on Aspartame and other sweeteners.

Frequently Asked Questions

The FDA classifies sugar substitutes either as food additives, which require pre-market approval, or as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) substances, which rely on publicly available evidence and expert consensus for safety.

A food additive sweetener requires formal, pre-market review and approval by the FDA, while a GRAS sweetener has a history of safe use or is supported by scientific evidence widely accepted by qualified experts, and does not require pre-market approval.

No, the FDA has only given GRAS status to highly purified steviol glycoside extracts from the stevia plant. The use of whole-leaf or crude stevia extracts is not approved for use as sweeteners.

The ADI is an estimate of the amount of a substance that can be safely consumed on a daily basis over a lifetime. The FDA sets an ADI for food additive sweeteners during the approval process.

Individuals with phenylketonuria (PKU), a rare genetic disorder, should avoid or restrict aspartame, as their bodies cannot properly metabolize one of its components, phenylalanine.

Yes, because sugar alcohols are not completely absorbed by the body, consuming them in large amounts can lead to gastrointestinal side effects such as bloating and diarrhea.

The FDA maintains that aspartame is safe for the general population under approved conditions of use, based on extensive scientific evidence. The agency publicly stated its disagreement with the WHO's IARC classification of aspartame as a 'possible carcinogen,' citing significant shortcomings in the studies used by IARC.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.