Skip to content

What Are Two Key Differences Between the Old Food Guide Pyramid and MyPlate?

4 min read

Over a decade ago, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) replaced the iconic Food Guide Pyramid with the simpler MyPlate graphic in 2011. The primary goal was to provide a clearer, more effective representation of healthy eating habits that addressed the old pyramid's shortcomings. What are two differences between the old Food Guide Pyramid and the updated pyramid that fundamentally changed nutritional guidance?

Quick Summary

The old Food Guide Pyramid relied on a tiered structure with grains at the base, replaced by MyPlate's visual of a divided plate that emphasizes half the portion for fruits and vegetables.

Key Points

  • Visual Shift: The old pyramid used a tiered, abstract shape, while MyPlate uses a simple, intuitive plate graphic to represent meal proportions.

  • Emphasis Change: The old pyramid's base was grains, promoting high carbohydrate intake; MyPlate dedicates half the plate to fruits and vegetables, emphasizing nutrient density.

  • Refined vs. Whole Grains: MyPlate explicitly recommends making half your grains whole grains, a distinction the old pyramid failed to make.

  • Portion Clarity: MyPlate provides a clearer, meal-by-meal guide for portion control, which was a weakness of the older pyramid's ambiguous serving suggestions.

  • Exclusion of Fats/Sugars: The final MyPlate graphic does not show fats and sugars, a change from the old pyramid where they occupied the smallest tip.

  • Personalization: MyPlate is more adaptable, with online tools to create a personalized plan based on individual needs, unlike the one-size-fits-all approach of the old pyramid.

In This Article

The Shift from a Pyramid to a Plate: A Modern Re-envisioning

For nearly two decades, the original 1992 Food Guide Pyramid served as the USDA's primary visual for dietary recommendations, influencing generations of Americans. However, as nutritional science evolved, so did the understanding of healthy eating, necessitating a clearer and more accurate guide. This led to the introduction of MyPlate in 2011, which replaced the previous pyramid structures, including the short-lived MyPyramid of 2005. The transition from a pyramid shape to a simple plate setting marked a significant change in how healthy eating was communicated to the public.

The Original Food Guide Pyramid (1992)

The original Food Guide Pyramid was a visual of a pyramid divided into horizontal sections of varying sizes. At the wide base were grains, cereals, rice, and pasta, suggesting they should form the foundation of a diet with 6-11 recommended daily servings. Above this were the fruits and vegetables. The smaller upper tiers contained milk, yogurt, and cheese, along with meat, poultry, fish, dry beans, eggs, and nuts. At the very top, in the smallest section, were fats, oils, and sweets, meant to be used sparingly. A major criticism was its overemphasis on grains, lumping all types together without distinguishing between more nutritious whole grains and refined, less-healthy options.

The Rise of MyPlate (2011)

MyPlate, launched by the USDA in 2011, completely abandoned the pyramid structure in favor of a divided plate and glass. It provides a more intuitive visual, showing a plate split into four sections for fruits, vegetables, grains, and protein, with a separate circle representing dairy. The visual is designed to resemble a typical meal setting, making it easier for consumers to understand and apply its principles to their own plates. It shifted the focus away from a hierarchical structure of 'servings' and towards simple, understandable proportions for meal composition.

Difference 1: The Visual Representation

The most obvious and immediate difference is the visual format itself. The old Food Guide Pyramid used abstract, horizontal layers, which confused many people about what constituted a serving and how to apply the hierarchy to a single meal. The tiers also inadvertently created a sense that all foods within a certain group were equally healthy. For instance, the large base for grains could be misinterpreted as a recommendation to consume excessive amounts of refined bread and pasta, which was a common issue.

In contrast, MyPlate's visual is a practical, direct representation of a balanced meal. The divided plate graphic shows users exactly what their proportions should look like at a glance: half the plate for fruits and vegetables, and the other half for grains and protein. This approach is far more actionable and intuitive for the average consumer, making it easier to immediately visualize and correct mealtime choices without having to calculate servings or consult external information.

Difference 2: Emphasis on Food Groups and Portion Ratios

A second critical difference is the change in emphasis, particularly regarding the relative importance of grains versus fruits and vegetables. The old pyramid's largest base layer, recommending 6-11 daily servings of grains, was widely criticized for placing too much emphasis on carbohydrates, especially refined varieties. This unbalanced focus failed to align with mounting evidence about the health benefits of fruits and vegetables.

MyPlate corrects this imbalance by placing fruits and vegetables as the dominant food groups, together occupying half of the plate. This encourages higher consumption of these nutrient-dense foods, which are rich in vitamins, minerals, and fiber. Furthermore, MyPlate specifically recommends making at least half of your grain intake whole grains, addressing a major flaw in the old pyramid that neglected to differentiate between whole and refined grains. This emphasis on whole grains promotes better digestive health and provides more sustained energy.

Comparison Table: Old Pyramid vs. MyPlate

Feature Old Food Guide Pyramid (1992) MyPlate (2011)
Visual Horizontal tiers in a pyramid shape Divided plate graphic for meal composition
Portion Emphasis Grains formed the largest base, suggesting highest intake Fruits and vegetables form the largest portion (half the plate)
Carbohydrates Grouped all grains together (refined and whole) Emphasizes making half your grains whole grains
Fats/Sugars Placed in the smallest, "use sparingly" tip Not shown on the main graphic, but guidance is available online
Actionability Less intuitive; required understanding "servings" Highly intuitive; visual guide for meal composition

Key Takeaways from the Change

  • Shifting Priorities: The guidance moved from emphasizing a grain-heavy diet to one richer in fruits and vegetables. This reflects a modern understanding of nutrition that prioritizes nutrient density.
  • Simplified Visualization: The plate graphic is more accessible and practical for everyday use than the abstract, layered pyramid.
  • Quality over Quantity: MyPlate introduces the crucial distinction between whole and refined grains, promoting healthier carbohydrate choices.
  • Clearer Portion Control: The plate visual offers a more direct and intuitive guide for portioning food at each meal, aiding in weight management and balanced eating.
  • Holistic Approach: The new approach focuses on creating a balanced plate with the right proportions rather than counting specific servings from various groups.

Conclusion

The evolution from the old Food Guide Pyramid to the MyPlate graphic represents a significant and evidence-based advancement in dietary recommendations. The two major differences—the move from an abstract, tiered pyramid to an intuitive divided plate, and the dramatic shift in emphasis from grains to fruits and vegetables—make healthy eating easier to understand and implement. By offering clearer visual guidance and promoting a better balance of food groups, MyPlate empowers individuals to make more informed and effective dietary choices for their overall health and well-being. For more detailed, personalized plans based on the latest guidelines, you can visit the official MyPlate website at MyPlate.gov.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Food Guide Pyramid was replaced because it was often confusing and misinterpreted by the public, placing too much emphasis on grains and failing to differentiate between healthier food options. MyPlate offers a clearer, more balanced, and intuitive visual guide based on updated nutritional science.

MyPlate represents five food groups: fruits, vegetables, grains, protein foods, and dairy. The visual includes four plate sections for the first four groups and a separate circle for dairy.

MyPyramid was a short-lived update introduced in 2005 that replaced the 1992 pyramid, but it was subsequently replaced by MyPlate in 2011. MyPyramid used colorful vertical stripes instead of horizontal tiers and was criticized for being vague and confusing.

You can find a personalized MyPlate plan on the official website, MyPlate.gov. The plan is customized based on your age, sex, height, weight, and physical activity level.

While fats and sugars are not shown on the main MyPlate graphic, the accompanying online resources and guidelines provide information on incorporating healthy fats and limiting added sugars.

MyPlate's key recommendations include filling half your plate with fruits and vegetables, making half your grains whole grains, varying your protein sources, and moving to low-fat or fat-free dairy.

No, the original Food Guide Pyramid is outdated and has been superseded by MyPlate. Most nutritionists and health organizations now refer to MyPlate and its underlying guidelines for dietary advice.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.