Skip to content

What is better for you, salmon or tuna? A comprehensive nutrition diet guide

4 min read

According to the American Heart Association, adults should aim for two servings of fish per week, especially fatty fish. When deciding between two popular choices, many wonder: what is better for you, salmon or tuna? Both are packed with protein and nutrients, but a closer look reveals different strengths that cater to specific health goals.

Quick Summary

A comparison of salmon and tuna reveals different nutritional profiles. Salmon is richer in omega-3s and vitamin D, while tuna offers a leaner, higher-protein option. Mercury content is also a key differentiator, with tuna generally containing higher levels than salmon. The better choice depends on specific dietary needs and health priorities.

Key Points

  • Salmon is superior for omega-3s: Salmon provides significantly more heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA) than tuna.

  • Tuna is higher in protein and lower in fat: If your goal is high-protein, low-fat intake for weight management, tuna is the more concentrated source.

  • Mercury levels differ significantly: Salmon is consistently low in mercury, whereas larger tuna species like albacore carry higher levels; canned light tuna is a safer, lower-mercury tuna option.

  • Choose based on health goals: Pick salmon for heart and brain health, or tuna for leaner protein. The best choice is personalized to your dietary needs.

  • Enjoy a variety of fish: Incorporating both salmon and tuna into your diet helps you gain a broader range of nutrients while minimizing mercury exposure.

In This Article

Seafood is a cornerstone of a healthy diet, celebrated for its high-quality protein and essential nutrients. Among the most popular fish choices are salmon and tuna, both of which offer significant benefits. However, their nutritional composition varies, meaning the 'better' option is subjective and depends on what you're looking for. This guide breaks down the key nutritional and health differences to help you decide which fish best fits your diet.

Nutritional Differences at a Glance

While both fish are excellent protein sources, they differ in their fat and calorie content. These differences are what primarily separate their nutritional benefits and make each suitable for different dietary goals.

Protein and Calories

  • Protein: Both are complete proteins, providing all nine essential amino acids. However, tuna is the leaner of the two and contains slightly more protein per ounce, making it a great option for those focusing on low-fat, high-protein intake for weight management.
  • Calories: Salmon is higher in calories due to its fat content, but this fat is primarily healthy polyunsaturated fat. For instance, a 3-ounce serving of wild salmon has around 175 calories, while the same serving of yellowfin tuna has about 91 calories.

Omega-3 Fatty Acids

  • Salmon's Omega-3 Powerhouse: Salmon is renowned for its high levels of omega-3 fatty acids, particularly eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). These essential fats are crucial for heart health, brain function, and reducing inflammation. A 3.5-ounce serving of salmon can provide over 1,500 mg of omega-3s.
  • Tuna's Contribution: While tuna does contain omega-3s, the levels are significantly lower than in salmon. The specific amount depends on the tuna species and whether it's fresh or canned. Canned light tuna, for example, has lower omega-3s than canned salmon.

Vitamins and Minerals

  • Salmon: Is a superior source of vitamin D, which is essential for calcium absorption and bone health. It is also high in B vitamins, including B12, important for nerve function and DNA synthesis.
  • Tuna: Stands out for its high selenium content, a powerful antioxidant that supports thyroid health. It is also rich in niacin (vitamin B3) and vitamin B6, which help convert food into energy.

Mercury Content

Mercury is a neurotoxin that can accumulate in fish, particularly larger predatory species.

  • Tuna: Is generally higher in mercury than salmon. Larger species like albacore and bigeye tuna contain more mercury than smaller species like skipjack, which is often used in canned light tuna. The FDA advises pregnant women and young children to limit albacore tuna to one serving per week.
  • Salmon: Has very low mercury levels and is considered a safe choice for regular consumption for most people, including pregnant women.

Salmon vs. Tuna: A Side-by-Side Comparison Table

To summarize the key nutritional differences, here is a quick overview based on a standard 3-ounce serving (raw):

Feature Wild Salmon Yellowfin Tuna
Calories ~121 ~91
Protein ~17g ~20g
Fat (total) ~5g <1g
Omega-3s (EPA/DHA) High (~2.2g) Low (<0.1g)
Vitamin D High Low
Selenium Good source Excellent source
Mercury Risk Low Higher (species-dependent)

Which Fish is Right for Your Health Goals?

Choosing between salmon and tuna ultimately depends on your priorities. Here are some scenarios to consider:

  • Prioritizing Heart and Brain Health: Opt for salmon. Its significantly higher concentration of omega-3 fatty acids is unmatched by tuna and offers potent anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular benefits.
  • Focusing on Lean Protein for Weight Management: Choose tuna. With fewer calories and less fat, tuna provides a substantial protein boost without a significant caloric load, helping with satiety.
  • Minimizing Mercury Exposure: If you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or just concerned about mercury, salmon is the safer choice due to its low mercury levels. When choosing tuna, opt for canned light varieties, which contain lower mercury than albacore.
  • Maximizing Micronutrients: If your goal is to boost a wide range of vitamins and minerals, consider incorporating both into your diet. This strategy allows you to benefit from salmon's vitamin D and B12 while also getting tuna's selenium and niacin.

Wild-Caught vs. Farmed and Canned vs. Fresh

The choice doesn't stop at just salmon or tuna. The source and preparation method also influence their nutritional value and safety.

  • Wild vs. Farmed: Wild-caught salmon generally has fewer calories and less total fat than farmed salmon, though both are excellent sources of omega-3s. Farmed salmon can have higher levels of certain contaminants, while wild fish may have higher levels of others, depending on the source. The source and sustainability practices are worth researching.
  • Canned vs. Fresh: Canned tuna and salmon are convenient and affordable alternatives to fresh fish. They generally retain similar nutrient profiles, including omega-3s, and canned salmon can be a great source of calcium if the bones are included. Choose cans packed in water to avoid extra calories and fat from oil. Opting for low-sodium versions can help manage blood pressure.

Conclusion: The Final Verdict

Ultimately, there is no single best answer to the question, "what is better for you, salmon or tuna?" Both are exceptionally healthy and can be valuable parts of a balanced nutrition diet. Salmon is the clear winner for omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin D, making it superior for heart and brain health. Tuna is the ideal choice for those seeking a high-protein, low-calorie option, and it excels in selenium and niacin content. For most healthy adults, the best approach is not to choose one over the other but to incorporate both into your diet in a rotational manner to receive the full spectrum of their unique nutritional benefits. Be mindful of mercury levels, especially if pregnant, and choose wild-caught, sustainably-sourced options when possible.

For more detailed information on healthy seafood choices, consider consulting a comprehensive guide from a trusted health resource like Healthline.

Frequently Asked Questions

Not necessarily. While salmon is richer in omega-3s and lower in mercury, tuna offers a higher protein-to-calorie ratio, which is beneficial for weight management. The healthier option depends on individual dietary needs and health priorities.

Salmon contains significantly more omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA) than tuna. This makes it particularly beneficial for heart, brain, and joint health.

Tuna generally has slightly more protein per ounce than salmon. It is a leaner, higher-protein choice, especially useful for those seeking to increase protein intake without adding fat.

Canned salmon is typically higher in omega-3s and calcium (if bones are included), and is lower in mercury than canned tuna. However, canned tuna (especially light) is a good, affordable source of protein. The better choice depends on your specific nutritional goals.

Pregnant women should prioritize salmon due to its very low mercury content and high levels of omega-3s, which are crucial for fetal brain development. Any tuna consumption should be limited, with canned light tuna being the safest option.

Mercury content varies by tuna species. Larger species like albacore and bigeye have higher levels, while smaller skipjack tuna used for canned light tuna has the lowest mercury levels.

Yes. Wild-caught salmon generally has fewer calories and less fat than farmed salmon, though both are excellent sources of omega-3s. Some differences in vitamin and mineral content also exist.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.