The Origins of the Mid-Day Squares Controversy
The Mid-Day Squares controversy is not a single event but a series of trademark disputes that the company's founders chose to address publicly through their candid social media platforms. Unlike traditional corporate entities that handle legal issues privately, Mid-Day Squares used their authentic, 'behind-the-scenes' narrative to rally their community. The primary issues came from two large food and beverage conglomerates: Kellogg and Hershey's.
The Kellogg's RXBar Complaint
The first instance involved a trademark infringement claim from Kellogg, the parent company of RXBar, concerning Mid-Day Squares' original packaging. Kellogg argued that the design was too similar and could confuse consumers. Mid-Day Squares, a small startup at the time, lacked the financial resources to wage a protracted legal battle against a corporate giant. The founders instead decided to overhaul their packaging completely, documenting the accelerated, 21-day redesign process for their audience on Instagram. This transparency turned a difficult corporate setback into an engaging, relatable story for their growing fanbase.
The Hershey's Peanut Butta Dispute
The most significant and well-publicized facet of the Mid-Day Squares controversy came from a standoff with Hershey's. In March 2021, Hershey's reportedly expressed interest in acquiring the Canadian company, but Mid-Day Squares declined the offer, aspiring for an IPO instead. Just one month later, in June 2021, Hershey's issued a cease-and-desist letter claiming that the orange packaging for Mid-Day Squares' Peanut Butta bar too closely resembled the iconic color of Reese's Peanut Butter Cups.
This sequence of events—the rejected acquisition followed by a legal threat—was characterized by the founders as a classic 'David vs. Goliath' narrative. Rather than engaging in a costly courtroom fight, Mid-Day Squares once again chose to use the situation as a marketing opportunity. They released a "diss track" music video, titled "Chocolate Gone Crazy," aimed directly at Hershey's. This creative and defiant response garnered viral attention and further solidified the company's anti-establishment brand image.
Mid-Day Squares' Controversial Marketing Tactics
The company's response to the legal threats cemented its reputation for unconventional and often controversial marketing.
- The Reality Show Model: The founders have built their brand by documenting the company's journey, including the struggles and internal drama, on social media. This unfiltered, and sometimes expletive-laden, content creates a high level of engagement and makes customers feel personally invested in the brand's success.
- The "Diss Track" and NFT Drop: The viral music video mocking Hershey's was a turning point. To memorialize the moment, the company also launched an NFT project tied to physical VHS tapes of the video, creating collectible memorabilia for their most loyal fans.
- Transparent Founder Updates: The company's openness extends beyond legal issues. The founders have candidly discussed personal challenges like burnout, which helps them build a deeper, more human connection with their audience.
Comparison: Mid-Day Squares vs. Traditional PR
| Aspect | Mid-Day Squares' Approach | Traditional Corporate PR Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Legal Strategy | Turned legal threats into public marketing events; avoided costly litigation by adapting. | Handled discreetly and privately; aimed to resolve matters with minimal public exposure. |
| Communication Style | Raw, unfiltered, and transparent via social media reality series. | Polished, curated, and often reactive statements through official channels. |
| Audience Engagement | Built community by documenting challenges and showing vulnerability. | Focused on maintaining a consistent, brand-safe message to avoid alienating customers. |
| Outcome | Transformed a potential PR nightmare into a viral marketing triumph, reinforcing brand authenticity. | Typically aims to minimize negative impact and return to normal brand messaging as quickly as possible. |
The Aftermath and Lasting Impact
In the aftermath of the legal disputes, Mid-Day Squares ultimately altered its packaging to appease the corporate giants, but not before leveraging the entire saga for immense brand visibility. The company’s sales and brand following grew exponentially as a result of their unapologetic and open approach. The strategy of publicly embracing challenges and using them as a tool for storytelling proved to be a powerful motivator for consumers who appreciate authenticity and underdog narratives. By taking on Hershey's and Kellogg's, even if symbolically, Mid-Day Squares positioned itself as a fearless, community-driven brand, a modern-day challenger to the food industry's old guard.
While critics may see the tactics as overly performative, the results speak for themselves. The company not only survived potential legal attacks but used them to build a robust and highly engaged customer base. This innovative, media-first strategy has become a case study in modern branding and entrepreneurship. The Mid-Day Squares controversy demonstrates that in the age of social media, transparency and bold storytelling can be more effective than traditional risk-averse tactics. To learn more about their unconventional journey, a detailed account of their handling of the Hershey and Kellogg pressure can be found in this Business Insider article: How Mid-Day Squares Revamped Packaging After Kellogg, Hershey Pressure.
In the long run, Mid-Day Squares' success is a testament to their unique philosophy: viewing challenges not as obstacles, but as opportunities to tell a more compelling story. This approach has not only built a business but has also cultivated a community that champions their every move.
Conclusion
The Mid-Day Squares controversy, initiated by trademark disputes with major food companies like Hershey's and Kellogg's, was skillfully navigated by the startup's founders through candid, public social media communication. By documenting their struggles and responding with a bold marketing campaign that included a viral "diss track," they transformed a legal threat into a powerful branding moment. This 'David vs. Goliath' narrative resonated deeply with consumers, solidifying their reputation for transparency and authenticity. The saga proves that innovative and unconventional marketing can turn corporate conflicts into significant victories for smaller brands, building customer loyalty and brand equity in the process.