Skip to content

What's the Lowest Calorie Milk Option at Starbucks for Your Drink?

4 min read

According to nutritional information widely cited by baristas and dietitians, almond milk is typically the lowest calorie milk option at Starbucks. This makes it a popular choice for those looking to reduce the calorie count of their favorite coffee beverages without sacrificing a creamy texture.

Quick Summary

Almond milk is the lowest calorie option at Starbucks, followed closely by nonfat milk, the lowest-calorie dairy choice. The best milk selection depends on individual dietary goals, taste preferences, and desired protein content.

Key Points

  • Almond Milk: The absolute lowest calorie milk option at Starbucks, with only 60 calories per 8-ounce serving, making it ideal for calorie reduction.

  • Nonfat (Skim) Milk: The lowest calorie dairy milk option, containing 80 calories per 8 ounces and offering a significant protein boost for satiety.

  • Dairy vs. Non-Dairy: While plant-based milks like almond and coconut can be lower in calories, dairy options like nonfat milk offer higher protein content per serving.

  • Flavor Compromise: Almond milk has a lighter texture and mild flavor, while creamier options like oat or soy milk come with a higher calorie cost.

  • Smart Customizations: Beyond milk choice, you can further reduce calories by using sugar-free syrups, ordering a Caffè Misto, and skipping whipped cream.

In This Article

For many Starbucks customers, enjoying a customized beverage is part of the daily routine. However, the caloric impact of different milk choices can vary dramatically, significantly affecting a drink's nutritional profile. Understanding your options is the first step toward making a more health-conscious decision that still satisfies your taste buds. This guide will walk you through the calorie counts of all the standard milks offered at Starbucks, helping you determine what's the lowest calorie milk option at Starbucks.

The Clear Winner: Almond Milk

When it comes to sheer calorie count, Starbucks' almond milk is the undisputed leader for the lowest number of calories. With around 60 calories per 8-ounce cup, it's a lightweight champion. Almond milk offers a mild, slightly nutty flavor that complements most coffee and espresso drinks without overpowering them. It's an excellent choice for anyone prioritizing the absolute lowest calorie count, especially in lattes and other espresso-based drinks. The flavor is light, and its texture is less creamy than dairy or oat milk, which is a trade-off some are willing to make for fewer calories.

A Closer Look at Nonfat (Skim) Milk

For those who prefer dairy, nonfat (skim) milk is the lowest-calorie choice and comes at no extra charge, unlike the plant-based alternatives. A cup of Starbucks' nonfat milk contains approximately 80 calories, putting it just slightly above almond milk. A key advantage of nonfat milk is its higher protein content, providing about 8 grams of protein per serving compared to the lower amount found in almond milk. This extra protein can help you feel more full and satisfied, making it a valuable consideration if you're managing hunger throughout the day.

How Other Milk Options Stack Up

While almond and nonfat milk are the top contenders for the lowest-calorie title, it's helpful to understand how the other milks compare. This perspective can help you make a fully informed decision based on your nutritional and taste preferences.

  • Coconut Milk: A tropical, slightly sweet option that comes in at roughly 80 calories per 8 ounces. It is dairy-free and has a smooth texture, but the flavor is more pronounced than almond milk.
  • Oat Milk: Despite its popularity for its creamy, rich texture, oat milk is higher in calories than almond and nonfat milks, often landing around 120-140 calories per cup. It also typically has more carbohydrates.
  • 2% Milk: This is the default milk for many Starbucks drinks and contains around 120 calories per 8-ounce serving. It offers a balanced flavor and creaminess that is the standard for most lattes.
  • Soy Milk: Another plant-based alternative, soy milk has about 130 calories per cup and is known for its relatively high protein content, similar to dairy milk.
  • Whole Milk: The highest-calorie option, whole milk contains roughly 140 calories per cup. It provides the richest, creamiest texture and flavor but is not ideal for those watching their calorie intake.

The Starbucks Milk Calorie Comparison Table

Milk Type Approx. Calories (per 8oz) Dairy/Non-Dairy Notable Features
Almond Milk 60 Non-Dairy Lowest calories, nutty flavor
Nonfat (Skim) Milk 80 Dairy Lowest-calorie dairy, high protein
Coconut Milk 80 Non-Dairy Tropical flavor, smooth texture
2% Milk 120 Dairy Standard option, balanced flavor
Oat Milk 120-140 Non-Dairy Creamy texture, higher carbs
Soy Milk 130 Non-Dairy High protein, creamy flavor
Whole Milk 140 Dairy Richest, creamiest texture, highest calories

Customizing Your Drink for Fewer Calories

Choosing the right milk is a great start, but several other customizations can help you save even more calories at Starbucks.

  • Ask for Sugar-Free Syrups: Standard syrups add significant calories from sugar. Opt for sugar-free vanilla or other sugar-free options to cut sweetness without the extra energy.
  • Reduce Syrup Pumps: If you prefer standard syrups, ask for fewer pumps. A standard Grande gets four pumps of syrup, so asking for two can cut calories significantly.
  • Skip the Whipped Cream: Whipped cream is a high-calorie topping. Skipping it is an easy way to save calories without altering the core flavor of your drink.
  • Opt for a Caffè Misto: This beverage consists of brewed coffee and steamed milk. It uses less milk than a standard latte, resulting in fewer calories overall.
  • Consider an Iced Coffee or Cold Brew: Black coffee is virtually calorie-free. A cold brew with a splash of almond milk and a sugar-free syrup can be a very low-calorie and refreshing option.

Conclusion: Making the Right Choice for You

Ultimately, the best milk for your Starbucks beverage depends on your specific goals. If your priority is the absolute lowest calorie count, almond milk is the top choice. If you prefer dairy and want more protein to keep you full, nonfat milk is an excellent contender. By understanding the nutritional differences and leveraging a few smart customizations, you can enjoy your favorite coffee drinks while staying on track with your health and wellness goals. There is no one-size-fits-all answer, but with the right information, you can make the perfect low-calorie choice for your next coffee run. For more dietary resources, check the official Starbucks nutrition information online.

Frequently Asked Questions

Starbucks' almond milk is the lowest-sugar option among the standard milk offerings, with only 5 grams of sugar per 8-ounce serving.

Almond milk is significantly lower in calories than oat milk at Starbucks. An 8-ounce serving of almond milk has approximately 60 calories, while oat milk is around 120-140 calories.

For a creamy and lower-calorie latte, nonfat (skim) milk is an excellent choice. It provides a rich dairy texture with only 80 calories per 8 ounces, more protein than almond milk, and no extra charge.

If you don't like almond milk, you can opt for nonfat (skim) milk, which is the lowest-calorie dairy option. You can also customize your drink by asking for sugar-free syrups, skipping whipped cream, or trying a Caffè Misto.

Soy milk is not the lowest calorie alternative at Starbucks, containing about 130 calories per 8 ounces. While it offers a good protein boost, almond and nonfat milks are better if your primary goal is calorie reduction.

There is a significant calorie difference. An 8-ounce serving of almond milk contains about 60 calories, whereas 2% milk has around 120 calories, making almond milk half the calories.

Starbucks charges extra for most non-dairy alternatives, including almond milk. However, nonfat (skim) milk is a dairy option that is often available at no additional cost and has a relatively low-calorie count.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.