Skip to content

Which are non-nutritive sweeteners and how do they work?

5 min read

According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), there are several non-nutritive sweeteners approved for use, including both artificial and naturally-derived options. Understanding which are non-nutritive sweeteners and how they differ from caloric sugars is crucial for anyone managing their calorie intake or blood sugar levels.

Quick Summary

This article defines what non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) are, detailing common examples like sucralose and stevia. It explores their characteristics, contrasts them with sugar, and discusses their safety, function, and regulatory status.

Key Points

  • Definition: Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) are sugar substitutes providing intense sweetness with few or no calories, unlike nutritive sweeteners like sugar.

  • Common Types: FDA-approved NNS include artificial options like sucralose (Splenda), aspartame (Equal), saccharin (Sweet'N Low), Acesulfame-K, neotame, and advantame.

  • Natural Sources: Naturally-derived NNS like stevia (from the stevia plant) and monk fruit extract are classified as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) by the FDA.

  • Mechanism: NNS work by activating sweet-taste receptors on the tongue and throughout the gastrointestinal tract, sending signals to the brain that are perceived as sweet.

  • Safety and Controversy: While regulatory bodies approve NNS as safe within Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) levels, ongoing research and observational studies have led to some controversy and caution regarding long-term use and potential health impacts.

  • Dietary Role: NNS are commonly used in diet sodas, sugar-free products, and as tabletop sweeteners, playing a role in calorie reduction and blood glucose management for some individuals.

In This Article

What are Non-Nutritive Sweeteners?

Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) are substances that provide intense sweetness with minimal or no calories, making them popular sugar substitutes for those managing weight or diabetes. Unlike nutritive sweeteners, which contain carbohydrates and provide energy (e.g., sugar, honey), NNS are often hundreds or even thousands of times sweeter than table sugar, so only tiny amounts are needed. The human body typically does not metabolize NNS for energy, which is why their caloric contribution is negligible. They are regulated by government bodies like the FDA, which classifies them as either food additives or substances that are Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS).

Types of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners

Non-nutritive sweeteners can be broadly categorized as artificial (synthetic) or natural (derived from plant sources).

Artificial Sweeteners

This category includes chemically synthesized sweeteners that the FDA has approved as food additives.

  • Saccharin: Discovered in 1878, saccharin is one of the oldest artificial sweeteners and is 200–700 times sweeter than sugar. It is not metabolized by the body and is often found in tabletop sweeteners like Sweet'N Low.
  • Aspartame: Approved in 1981, aspartame is 200 times sweeter than sugar. It is made from two amino acids (aspartic acid and phenylalanine) and is not heat-stable, making it unsuitable for baking. Brands include Equal and NutraSweet.
  • Acesulfame-Potassium (Acesulfame-K or Ace-K): Roughly 200 times sweeter than sugar, Acesulfame-K is often blended with other sweeteners to mask a slight aftertaste. It is heat-stable and can be used in baking and is found in products like diet sodas and tabletop sweeteners (e.g., Sweet One).
  • Sucralose: Derived from sucrose, sucralose is about 600 times sweeter than sugar. It is heat-stable, making it suitable for a wide range of applications, including baking. Splenda is the most well-known brand.
  • Neotame: This sweetener is 7,000–13,000 times sweeter than sugar and is approved for use as a general-purpose sweetener and flavor enhancer. It is stable under heat but is mainly used in manufactured food products rather than sold directly to consumers.
  • Advantame: Approved more recently in 2014, advantame is extremely potent, approximately 20,000 times sweeter than sugar. It is also heat-stable and used as a flavor enhancer in various foods and beverages.

Naturally-Derived Sweeteners

These are isolated or extracted from plant sources and are classified as GRAS by the FDA, meaning they are generally recognized as safe by experts.

  • Steviol Glycosides (Stevia): Extracted from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant, Stevia is 200–400 times sweeter than sugar and has no calories or carbohydrates. Brand names include Truvia and PureVia.
  • Monk Fruit Extract (Luo Han Guo): This extract comes from the monk fruit, a small gourd native to Southern China. It is 150–300 times sweeter than sugar and is heat-stable, with no calories or glycemic impact.

Non-Nutritive vs. Nutritive Sweeteners

To understand the fundamental differences, here is a comparison table outlining key characteristics of NNS versus traditional, caloric sweeteners:

Feature Non-Nutritive Sweeteners (NNS) Nutritive Sweeteners Sugar Alcohols (Polyols)
Calorie Content Zero or minimal calories Provides significant calories Reduced calories (avg. 2 kcal/g)
Sweetness Intensity Very high (200-20,000x sweeter than sugar) Standard (e.g., sucrose is 1x) Moderate (60-80% as sweet as sugar)
Metabolic Effect Generally do not impact blood glucose Cause a rise in blood glucose Minimal impact on blood glucose
Typical Examples Aspartame, sucralose, stevia, saccharin Sugar, high-fructose corn syrup, honey Erythritol, xylitol, sorbitol, maltitol
Intake Used in very small quantities Used in larger quantities Moderate consumption to avoid GI issues
Common Uses Diet drinks, sugar-free desserts, tabletop sweeteners Candies, baked goods, sodas, processed foods Sugar-free gum, candies, baked goods

How Non-Nutritive Sweeteners Work

The mechanism of how non-nutritive sweeteners provide sweetness without calories is complex and still being studied. The perception of sweetness begins when NNS molecules bind to specific sweet-taste receptors, which are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), on taste buds in the mouth. This binding sends a signal to the brain, which is interpreted as a sweet taste.

Beyond the mouth, these receptors have also been found throughout the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The activation of these gut-based receptors can trigger the release of various hormones involved in appetite and glucose regulation, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Some NNS, like sucralose, are not absorbed by the body and are excreted unchanged. Others, like aspartame, are broken down into their component parts (amino acids) but are used in such small amounts that their caloric contribution is insignificant.

There is some emerging research suggesting that NNS can influence the composition of the gut microbiota, which in turn could potentially affect glucose tolerance and metabolism. However, more studies are needed to fully understand the long-term implications of these interactions.

Safety and Health Considerations

The safety of non-nutritive sweeteners has been a subject of extensive research and debate for decades. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and the World Health Organization (WHO) have set acceptable daily intake (ADI) levels based on comprehensive toxicology studies. The ADI is the amount of a substance that can be consumed safely on a daily basis over a lifetime.

While FDA-approved NNS are generally considered safe within these limits, observational data have raised questions about potential long-term effects. For example, some studies have associated long-term NNS consumption with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, although the results are inconsistent across studies and often confounded by other lifestyle factors. A notable recommendation came from the WHO in 2023, which advised against using non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in the long term, citing a lack of sustained benefit in body fat reduction and suggesting potential negative long-term health risks.

Conclusion

Non-nutritive sweeteners offer a calorie-free way to enjoy a sweet taste, with options ranging from long-standing artificial compounds like saccharin to more modern, naturally-derived ones like stevia and monk fruit. These high-intensity sweeteners work by activating sweet-taste receptors and are used in minimal quantities in a wide array of foods and beverages. While approved for safety by regulatory bodies within specific intake limits, the scientific and public discussion around their long-term health effects continues. For consumers, moderation is key, and individuals with specific health conditions should always consult a healthcare professional or registered dietitian for personalized advice regarding their use.

Frequently Asked Questions

The main difference is calorie content. Nutritive sweeteners (like sugar) provide calories, while non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) provide minimal or no calories because they are not metabolized by the body for energy.

Yes, regulatory bodies like the FDA have approved non-nutritive sweeteners for consumption within established Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) levels, which are generally very difficult to reach through typical dietary intake.

For most FDA-approved non-nutritive sweeteners, there is no direct impact on blood sugar levels because they are not digested in the same way as sugar. This makes them a common choice for people with diabetes.

Some individuals may experience gastrointestinal side effects, such as bloating or diarrhea, particularly from consuming sugar alcohols, which are different from non-nutritive sweeteners. For artificial sweeteners like aspartame, some anecdotal reports link it to headaches, but scientific studies have not conclusively confirmed these effects.

Yes, but not all types. Heat-stable NNS like sucralose and Acesulfame-K can be used for baking. However, others like aspartame break down when heated and lose their sweetness.

The link between NNS and weight gain is controversial and inconclusive. While some observational studies have suggested an association, confounding factors make it difficult to prove a causal relationship, and other studies show potential for weight management.

The best choice depends on individual preference regarding taste, aftertaste, and heat stability. For those seeking naturally-derived options, stevia and monk fruit are popular. For baking, sucralose or Acesulfame-K are good options due to their heat stability.

In 2023, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended against using non-sugar sweeteners for long-term weight control, based on evidence suggesting no long-term benefit for fat reduction and potential long-term health risks.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.