Skip to content

Which is better, CoQ10 or ubiquinol? A comprehensive nutrition diet guide

3 min read

According to research, the body's natural production of Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) and its ability to convert its forms decline significantly with age, prompting many to question which is better, CoQ10 or ubiquinol? for supplementation. The answer depends largely on individual health, age, and specific goals.

Quick Summary

CoQ10 (ubiquinone) is the oxidized form, while ubiquinol is the active, reduced form that is more easily absorbed. The body converts between these forms, but conversion efficiency decreases with age. Ubiquinol may be more beneficial for older adults or those with certain health conditions, while CoQ10 is more stable and often more affordable for general wellness.

Key Points

  • Ubiquinone vs. Ubiquinol: Ubiquinone is the oxidized, inactive form of CoQ10, while ubiquinol is the active, reduced form that the body can use immediately.

  • Absorption Varies by Age: The body's ability to convert ubiquinone to ubiquinol decreases with age, which is why ubiquinol is often recommended for those over 40 or 50.

  • Formulation Matters Most: The quality and formulation of the supplement (e.g., in an oil-based soft-gel) can be more important for absorption than the form itself, with high-quality ubiquinone supplements showing comparable or even better results.

  • Clinical Evidence is Strongest for Ubiquinone: Most long-term clinical trials on heart health have been conducted with ubiquinone, providing extensive data on its effectiveness.

  • Cost is a Factor: Ubiquinone is more stable and less expensive to manufacture, making it a more budget-friendly option for general wellness.

  • Consult a Doctor: Always discuss supplementation with a healthcare provider, especially if taking statins or other medications, to determine the best choice for your individual needs.

In This Article

Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) is a crucial, fat-soluble compound found throughout the body, vital for cellular energy production and acting as an antioxidant. It exists in two forms: ubiquinone (oxidized) and ubiquinol (reduced, active). The body converts ubiquinone to ubiquinol, but this conversion efficiency decreases with age. This has led to questions about which form is best for supplements, considering factors like absorption, stability, and cost.

The Difference Between Ubiquinone and Ubiquinol

The body continuously converts CoQ10 between ubiquinone and ubiquinol for energy production.

  • Ubiquinone: This is the standard, often more affordable, oxidized form found in many supplements. It must be converted to ubiquinol to act as an antioxidant. However, the ubiquinone form is necessary to initiate energy production in the mitochondria.
  • Ubiquinol: This is the 'active' form, ready for immediate use, and is the primary form responsible for antioxidant protection.

Factors Affecting Absorption

While ubiquinol is often promoted for its higher bioavailability, some research suggests that the supplement's formulation is a more significant factor than the specific form. CoQ10 is fat-soluble, so absorption is best with oil-based formulations, like those often found in soft-gel capsules. Interestingly, ubiquinol may convert back to ubiquinone in the stomach before absorption and reconversion in the lymph, adding steps. Ubiquinone typically requires only one conversion step after absorption.

Clinical Evidence and Specific Applications

Both forms are used for various health purposes, with ubiquinone having more extensive long-term clinical trial data.

Heart Health and Statin Use

Studies, including the Q-SYMBIO and KISEL-10 trials, have shown that ubiquinone supplementation benefits heart failure patients by improving heart function and reducing mortality. Ubiquinone's long clinical history makes it a common choice for heart health. Statins, which lower cholesterol, can also lower the body's CoQ10 levels, leading to recommendations for supplementation to reduce potential muscle issues.

Fertility

Both ubiquinone and ubiquinol are used to support fertility by improving cellular energy and reducing oxidative stress. A 2020 review found no significant difference in bioavailability between the two forms for fertility, as the body converts ubiquinone effectively.

Ageing and General Wellness

Since the body's ability to convert ubiquinone decreases with age, ubiquinol is often recommended for those over 40-50 or experiencing age-related fatigue. Younger, healthy adults who efficiently convert ubiquinone may find it a more cost-effective option.

Comparison: CoQ10 (Ubiquinone) vs. Ubiquinol

Feature CoQ10 (Ubiquinone) Ubiquinol (Active Form)
Form Oxidized Reduced, active
Absorption Lower intrinsic absorption, but highly dependent on formulation Higher intrinsic bioavailability, 'body-ready'
Stability More stable and less prone to oxidation Less stable, can oxidize back to ubiquinone in storage or digestion
Cost Generally more affordable Often more expensive
Best for Younger, healthy individuals; long-term cardiovascular studies Older adults (>40-50); those with health conditions or fatigue
Clinical Data Extensive long-term trial data available Fewer long-term clinical trials available

How to Choose the Right Supplement for You

The choice between CoQ10 and ubiquinol depends on individual factors:

  1. Age and Health: Younger, healthy individuals may find ubiquinone sufficient and more budget-friendly. Older adults or those with health concerns might benefit more from ubiquinol's higher bioavailability.
  2. Formulation is Key: Prioritize a high-quality formulation, such as an oil-based soft-gel, for optimal absorption, regardless of the form.
  3. Consider Cost: Ubiquinone is typically less expensive.
  4. Consult Your Doctor: Always speak with a healthcare provider before starting any supplement, especially if you have existing health conditions or take other medications.

Conclusion

The question of which is better, CoQ10 or ubiquinol? has no single answer, as both forms are important and the body converts between them. Younger, healthy people may benefit from ubiquinone due to its cost and stability. Older adults or those with specific health issues might find ubiquinol more effective due to its higher bioavailability. Ultimately, the quality and formulation of the supplement are paramount to achieving the benefits of CoQ10 supplementation.

Mayo Clinic Q and A: Statin use doesn't always mean coenzyme Q10 supplement is needed

Frequently Asked Questions

Some research suggests ubiquinol is more bioavailable, especially for older adults or those with health conditions affecting conversion. However, other studies show that the formulation of the supplement is more critical for absorption than the form itself, with high-quality ubiquinone supplements showing comparable or even better results.

Ubiquinol is often suggested for older individuals because the body's natural conversion of ubiquinone declines with age. If you are over 40 and seeking a supplement for heart health or energy, ubiquinol may be a more efficient option, though a quality ubiquinone can also be effective.

CoQ10 is naturally present in foods like oily fish, organ meats, nuts, and spinach, but in relatively low concentrations. Supplementation is typically needed to achieve levels used in clinical studies.

Both CoQ10 and ubiquinol are considered safe and well-tolerated, even when taken. Side effects are typically mild and uncommon, such as gastrointestinal upset or headaches.

The amount varies depending on the health goal and the form of CoQ10. It is best to consult a healthcare provider for personalized guidance.

Coenzyme Q10 supplements are frequently recommended for people taking statin drugs, as statins can deplete CoQ10 levels in the body. Supplementation may help reduce statin-associated muscle symptoms like pain and fatigue.

For cardiovascular disease, especially heart failure, extensive long-term clinical trial evidence supports the use of ubiquinone to reduce mortality and improve heart function. While ubiquinol also has antioxidant properties beneficial for the heart, the robust data is largely based on ubiquinone studies.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.