Skip to content

Which is Healthier, Poha or Murmura? An In-Depth Nutritional Comparison

5 min read

According to nutritional data, 100 grams of poha contains approximately 110 calories, while 100 grams of murmura can have over 400 calories. While both are made from rice, their different processing methods and nutritional profiles lead to a clear winner in the debate of which is healthier, poha or murmura.

Quick Summary

This nutritional analysis compares poha and murmura, detailing their processing, calorie count, glycemic index, fiber content, and suitability for weight management and diabetic-friendly diets. Learn the key differences to make an informed choice for your next meal or snack.

Key Points

  • Nutrient Density: Poha retains more nutrients like iron and B vitamins due to its minimal processing compared to murmura.

  • Glycemic Index: Poha has a moderate GI, leading to a slower rise in blood sugar, making it better for diabetics than murmura, which has a high GI.

  • Calorie Count: Per 100 grams, murmura is far more calorie-dense (~402 kcal) than poha (~110 kcal), although murmura's low weight means a typical serving has fewer calories.

  • Satiety and Fiber: Poha is more fibrous and satiating, helping with weight management by keeping you full longer than light, airy murmura.

  • Best for Meals: Poha is a better choice for a balanced, filling meal, especially when cooked with vegetables and legumes.

  • Best for Snacks: Murmura can be a good low-calorie snack option if portion-controlled and not heavily processed or fried.

  • Processing Matters: Poha's simple processing is healthier, while murmura's puffing process strips away more nutritional value.

In This Article

The Origins and Processing: A Tale of Two Rice Products

Both poha (flattened rice) and murmura (puffed rice) begin their journey as rice grains, but diverge significantly during their preparation, which ultimately defines their health attributes. Poha is made by parboiling rice, which is then rolled, flattened, and sun-dried. This minimal processing helps it retain more of its natural nutrients, particularly if it's brown or red poha. Murmura, on the other hand, is made by parboiling, drying, and then puffing the rice grains by tossing them in a hot pan with sand or salt. This puffing process makes it light and airy but strips away much of its nutritional value.

Calorie Density: A Major Deciding Factor

When considering which is healthier, the calorie count per 100 grams is a critical metric. The substantial difference is often a surprise to many. Poha, being flattened, is less calorie-dense per 100 grams compared to murmura's inflated, low-density structure. For example, 100 grams of poha typically contains around 110 calories, while the same weight of murmura can pack up to 402 calories. However, it is important to remember that murmura's low density means you're likely to consume a smaller volume of it. One cup (14-15 grams) of murmura contains only 55-60 calories, making it a viable light snack if portion sizes are controlled.

The Glycemic Index and Blood Sugar Control

The glycemic index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar levels, a crucial factor for diabetics and those managing weight. Poha has a moderate GI, which means it causes a more gradual and steady rise in blood sugar. The presence of dietary fiber in poha is key to slowing down the absorption of sugar into the bloodstream. Conversely, murmura has a high GI because the extensive processing and puffing make its carbohydrates rapidly digestible. This can lead to a quick spike in blood sugar, making poha the superior choice for blood sugar management.

Dietary Fiber and Digestive Health

Fiber is essential for good digestive health, and here again, poha generally outperforms murmura. Poha retains more dietary fiber than puffed rice. The fiber content in poha helps aid digestion and promotes satiety, helping you feel fuller for longer. While plain puffed rice is very low in fiber, some brown rice or fortified varieties may contain slightly more. For weight loss and digestive regularity, the higher fiber content of poha is a significant advantage.

Micronutrient Retention: Iron and B Vitamins

The gentler processing of poha means it holds onto more of its micronutrients. It is known to be a good source of iron, especially because it passes through iron rollers during its preparation. Squeezing lemon juice onto cooked poha further enhances the body's iron absorption. Some varieties of poha, like red poha, contain even more iron and other nutrients due to the bran layer being preserved. Murmura, in its plain form, often has minimal micronutrients unless it has been fortified.

Poha vs. Murmura: A Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature Poha (Flattened Rice) Murmura (Puffed Rice)
Processing Minimally processed, parboiled and flattened. Highly processed, parboiled and puffed.
Calories (per 100g) ~110 calories. ~402 calories.
Glycemic Index Moderate, for a gradual blood sugar rise. High, causing rapid blood sugar spikes.
Fiber Content Higher, promotes better digestion and satiety. Lower, minimal dietary fiber.
Micronutrients Retains more iron and B vitamins. Minimal micronutrients unless fortified.
Diabetic Suitability Better choice due to lower GI and higher fiber. Less suitable due to high GI.
Weight Loss More filling and lower calorie-density per serving. Can be lower calorie per small serving, but less satiating.

The Final Verdict: Choosing Based on Your Health Goals

So, which is healthier? For most health-conscious individuals, especially those with diabetes or focusing on weight loss, poha is the clear winner. Its higher fiber content, moderate glycemic index, and better nutritional profile make it a more wholesome and balanced option for a meal like breakfast. The natural probiotic qualities of poha, resulting from its fermentation process, are also a bonus for gut health.

However, murmura still has a place in a balanced diet. Its incredibly low-density makes it suitable as a very light, low-calorie snack, provided it's not loaded with sugar or excess fat. A small cup of plain murmura can be a better choice for a light mid-meal snack than other high-calorie alternatives. Ultimately, the healthiest preparation for either is paramount. Cooking poha with plenty of vegetables, legumes like peanuts, and minimal oil boosts its nutritional value, while avoiding fried versions. Similarly, opting for plain murmura over sugary or fried variations is always best.

Conclusion

While both poha and murmura are derivatives of rice, their differing processing methods result in stark nutritional differences. Poha, with its lower calorie density, moderate glycemic index, and higher fiber content, is generally the healthier choice for a balanced meal and for managing blood sugar levels. Murmura serves as a very light snack, but its high glycemic index and lower fiber require mindful consumption. For optimal health benefits, focusing on preparation methods, adding vegetables, and controlling portions will ensure you get the most nutritional value from either option.

To explore more in-depth nutritional information on these and other food staples, you can visit the National Institute of Nutrition (NIN) of India or similar authoritative sources on dietary science. For example, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) publishes dietary guidelines that provide comprehensive data on the nutritional value of various Indian foods, including poha and murmura.

Making the Best Choice for You

Based on a nutritional evaluation, poha is generally superior for overall health, digestion, and weight management. This is due to its less-processed state, which preserves a higher fiber content and results in a lower glycemic index, preventing blood sugar spikes. While murmura can serve as a very light, low-calorie snack in small portions, its high glycemic load and low fiber make it a less satiating option. The healthiest choice for your diet depends on your specific health goals and how you choose to prepare and consume each food.


Authoritative Source: The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) is a reliable source for Indian food nutritional data. Check their publications for detailed breakdowns.

Anuvaad Solutions, 'Murmura (Puffed rice)', Anuvaad Solutions, 2024. [https://www.anuvaad.org.in/nutrition-fact/murmura-puffed-rice/]

Metropolis Healthcare, 'Poha: Calories, Benefits & Nutritional Value', Metropolis Healthcare, 2025. [https://www.metropolisindia.com/blog/preventive-healthcare/poha-benefits-calories-nutritional-value]

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, poha is considered a good breakfast for weight loss due to its low calorie count (around 110 calories per 100g) and higher fiber content, which helps you feel full for longer and prevents overeating.

Yes, murmura has a high glycemic index because of its heavy processing. This causes it to be absorbed quickly by the body, leading to a rapid spike in blood sugar levels, making it less ideal for diabetics.

Both are relatively easy to digest, but poha, with its slightly higher fiber content, aids in better digestion and gut health. Murmura's processed nature makes it very light, but it offers less digestive benefit.

You can make poha healthier by adding a variety of vegetables like peas, carrots, and onions, along with protein sources like peanuts or sprouts. Cooking with minimal oil and adding a squeeze of lemon juice to enhance iron absorption is also recommended.

The primary difference lies in their calorie density, fiber, and glycemic index. Per 100g, poha has significantly fewer calories, more fiber, and a lower GI than murmura due to its less-processed nature.

No, murmura is not inherently bad but should be consumed in moderation, especially in its plain form. The issue arises with portion size and preparation, as high-sugar or deep-fried variants can be unhealthy. Its low fiber and high GI are also considerations.

Yes, diabetics can eat poha, as its moderate glycemic index helps control blood sugar spikes. However, portion control and adding plenty of vegetables are crucial for managing blood sugar effectively.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.