Skip to content

Which State Has the Least Vegans? A Look at U.S. Dietary Trends

4 min read

According to a 2023 study by Vegan FTA, Wyoming was ranked the least likely state to go vegan, with low scores in vegan meetups, Google search interest, and savings from a plant-based diet. This ranking reveals significant regional differences in dietary habits across the United States, shaped by culture, geography, and infrastructure.

Quick Summary

Several reports identify Wyoming, Mississippi, and Arkansas as having some of the lowest vegan populations in the U.S. These states often feature traditional, meat-centric food cultures and fewer vegan-friendly dining options and community resources. Data points to the strong influence of regional agriculture and economic factors on local dietary patterns.

Key Points

  • Wyoming Ranks Lowest: According to a 2023 Vegan FTA study, Wyoming was the least likely state to have vegans, based on low search interest and limited vegan resources.

  • The South Follows: Mississippi, Arkansas, and Alabama frequently appear on lists of least vegan-friendly states, influenced by traditional, meat-centric food cultures and economic factors.

  • Culture and Agriculture Play a Role: States with low vegan populations often have strong livestock-based economies and deep-rooted culinary traditions centered on meat.

  • Accessibility is a Key Factor: The number of vegan restaurants, grocery options, and community groups per capita is a major indicator of vegan prevalence in a state.

  • Most Vegan States Offer a Contrast: In contrast, states like Hawaii and Oregon, which have higher vegan populations, exhibit more diverse culinary landscapes and greater access to plant-based resources.

In This Article

Regional Differences in Plant-Based Lifestyles

While veganism and plant-based eating continue to grow in popularity across the United States, several states consistently rank at the bottom of surveys examining vegan-friendly factors. Rankings are typically based on a variety of metrics, including the number of vegan restaurants per capita, online search interest for vegan topics, and local availability of plant-based products. Research from organizations like Vegan FTA, The Vegan Review, and YorkTest often points to states in the Mountain West and the South as having the lowest adoption rates of a vegan lifestyle. These regional differences are influenced by a complex interplay of cultural traditions, economic drivers, and limited vegan infrastructure.

The Least Vegan-Friendly States

Multiple studies consistently highlight a handful of states where veganism is less common. These lists often include:

  • Wyoming: Cited by Vegan FTA as the state least likely to go vegan in 2023. Its low population density, with fewer vegan restaurants and community resources per capita, is a major contributing factor.
  • Arkansas: Identified as the second least-likely state to go vegan in the same study, with low scores across all categories. Like Wyoming, it has a strong traditional meat-eating culture and fewer vegan-friendly establishments.
  • Mississippi: Listed by YorkTest as the state with the highest decrease in year-on-year vegan search interest in 2023. This indicates a declining rather than growing interest in plant-based eating. The Vegan Review also places it among the least vegan-friendly states.
  • Alabama: Another state frequently listed among the least vegan-friendly, often ranking near Mississippi due to similar cultural and economic factors.
  • Kansas: Included in rankings of states with low vegan populations, reflecting the strong influence of livestock agriculture on local food culture and accessibility.

Factors Influencing Regional Veganism

Several interconnected factors explain why some states have a significantly lower percentage of vegan residents:

  • Culture and Tradition: Many states, particularly in the South and Mountain West, have strong culinary traditions centered around meat, dairy, and eggs. Dishes like barbecue, fried chicken, and steak are staples of the local diet, making a shift to veganism less common.
  • Agricultural Economy: A state's economy can heavily influence its residents' dietary choices. States with robust livestock industries, such as Wyoming and Arkansas, often promote and consume more meat, with beef and poultry being major economic drivers.
  • Accessibility and Infrastructure: Access to vegan-friendly resources, including restaurants, grocery options, and community groups, is a major predictor of vegan population density. Densely populated, urban states tend to have more diverse dining scenes and more accessible vegan options, while sparsely populated rural states have far fewer.
  • Online Search Interest: Tracking Google search trends for vegan-related topics can serve as a proxy for public interest. States with lower search volume often correspond with lower vegan populations. Studies have shown significant drops in vegan-related searches in some of the least vegan states.

Comparison: Least Vegan States vs. Most Vegan States

To better understand the factors at play, a comparison of the least vegan states with their most vegan-friendly counterparts is illustrative. States like Hawaii, Oregon, and California frequently top the list for vegan-friendliness, based on the availability of resources and search interest.

Factor Least Vegan States (e.g., Wyoming, Mississippi) Most Vegan States (e.g., Hawaii, Oregon)
Vegan Restaurants Per Capita Very Low High
Online Search Interest Low or Decreasing High
Local Agriculture Dominant livestock and meat production More diverse, often including specialized produce
Cultural Diet Traditional, meat-heavy cuisine More diverse, health-conscious, and plant-forward
Population Density Lower and more rural Higher, with more urban centers

Challenges for Vegans in Less Vegan-Friendly States

Individuals choosing a vegan lifestyle in states with limited vegan options face specific challenges. These include:

  • Limited Dining Options: Finding suitable restaurants can be difficult, especially outside major cities. This often means relying on limited options or having to make special requests.
  • Grocery Shopping: While basic vegan products like produce are widely available, specialized items such as plant-based meats, cheeses, and unique ingredients may be scarce.
  • Community and Support: Access to local vegan meetups and support groups is significantly lower in these states, which can make it feel isolating to maintain a plant-based lifestyle.
  • Social and Cultural Pressure: Social gatherings often revolve around traditional meat-centric meals, which can create social pressure or discomfort for vegans.

Conclusion: A Reflective Trend

The data from multiple sources consistently points to states like Wyoming, Arkansas, and Mississippi as having the lowest vegan populations in the U.S. This is not a judgment on the residents of these states but rather a reflection of powerful socio-cultural and economic factors. The prevalence of a vegan diet is strongly correlated with a state's agricultural focus, cultural eating habits, and the availability of vegan-specific resources. As national dietary trends continue to evolve, it will be interesting to observe how these regional disparities in plant-based eating change over time. For more in-depth data on regional diet trends, consult resources from organizations like the CDC and USDA.

Understanding the Data Limitations

It is important to acknowledge that available data, often compiled by private firms and based on proxies like online searches and restaurant density, may not perfectly represent the exact number of vegans in each state. Nevertheless, these studies provide a consistent and reliable indicator of regional interest and infrastructure, highlighting clear trends across the country.

Frequently Asked Questions

Recent studies, such as one from 2023 by Vegan FTA, identify Wyoming as the state least likely to go vegan, based on factors including low vegan search interest and limited resources.

Yes, other states often cited for having low vegan populations include Mississippi, Arkansas, Alabama, and Kansas, which are also known for traditional meat-heavy diets and livestock agriculture.

Key factors include strong cultural traditions around meat consumption, an economy driven by livestock agriculture, low population density resulting in fewer vegan restaurants and meetups, and generally low online interest in plant-based diets.

The number of vegan-friendly restaurants is often tied to population density and urban development. Larger, more urbanized states have a higher demand for diverse dining options, while sparsely populated rural states have fewer.

Official census data on veganism is not regularly collected. Rankings are often based on proxy data like restaurant counts, online search trends, and market analysis, which provide strong indicators but are not definitive headcounts.

Not necessarily. While some studies link low vegan populations to higher meat consumption, overall state health is influenced by many factors beyond diet, such as exercise habits and access to healthcare.

For more information on dietary trends and health statistics, authoritative sources like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) provide extensive data.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.