Skip to content

Wild Collagen vs. True Collagen: Which Is Better for Your Needs?

4 min read

Over 30% of the body's total protein is collagen, making it a critical component for skin, joint, and bone health. When it comes to supplements, understanding the source is key, particularly when comparing products like wild collagen or true collagen, which refer to marine and bovine sources, respectively.

Quick Summary

A comparison of wild (marine) and true (bovine) collagen reveals both are effective Type I hydrolyzed peptides for overall wellness, with the main differences being their sourcing and minor amino acid profiles. The best choice depends on dietary preferences and sustainability concerns.

Key Points

  • Source is the main difference: Wild Collagen comes from marine sources (fish), while True Collagen is derived from bovine (cattle) sources.

  • Comparable effectiveness: High-quality, hydrolyzed versions of both marine and bovine collagen are considered equally effective for promoting overall health.

  • Absorption is high for both: Both types offer excellent bioavailability once broken down into peptides, with little practical difference in absorption rates.

  • Dietary preference is a key factor: Your choice depends on whether you follow a pescatarian diet or have a preference regarding red meat consumption or fish allergies.

  • Bovine offers Types I and III: True (bovine) collagen naturally contains traces of Type III in addition to Type I, providing a slightly different profile compared to the Type I-heavy marine variety.

  • Check for sustainability: For wild collagen, look for MSC certification to ensure sustainable fishing practices.

In This Article

While the names 'Wild Collagen' and 'True Collagen' refer to specific products from the brand Ancient + Brave, they represent the broader categories of marine and bovine-sourced supplements. Ultimately, high-quality versions of both are equally effective, and the decision often comes down to personal and dietary preferences. This comprehensive guide will break down the similarities, differences, and help determine which option aligns best with your health and lifestyle.

Marine Collagen vs. Bovine Collagen: The Fundamental Difference

At its core, the primary distinction between wild collagen and true collagen is their animal source.

Wild (Marine) Collagen

Wild collagen is sourced from wild-caught fish, typically from the skin and scales. This is a Type I collagen, which is the most abundant type in the human body, providing strength and elasticity to skin, bones, and connective tissues.

Key characteristics of marine collagen include:

  • Sustainably sourced from free-swimming fish, often with MSC certification.
  • Typically contains a slightly smaller peptide size, which some studies suggest may lead to more efficient absorption, though both types boast excellent bioavailability.
  • A valuable alternative for those who do not consume red meat.

True (Bovine) Collagen

True collagen is derived from the hides of grass-fed bovine (cattle). It provides a combination of Type I and traces of Type III collagen, the latter of which is beneficial for the structural integrity of muscles, organs, and arteries.

Key characteristics of bovine collagen include:

  • Sourced from grass-fed cows, offering a broad spectrum of amino acids.
  • Naturally contains Type III collagen in addition to Type I.
  • Often considered more cost-effective and is free from the 14 major allergens, making it suitable for those with fish or shellfish allergies.

The Efficacy of Wild vs. True Collagen

When choosing a collagen supplement, many people want to know which is more effective. The scientific consensus is that high-quality, hydrolyzed marine and bovine collagen peptides are equally effective for improving skin, joint, and bone health. Regardless of the source, the collagen is broken down into peptides, which the body then uses to stimulate its own collagen production.

  • Absorption: While marine collagen is sometimes touted as having superior absorption due to smaller peptide size, the difference is not clinically significant. Both marine and bovine supplements have excellent bioavailability when hydrolyzed, with some studies showing bovine peptides are 90% absorbed within hours of consumption.
  • Amino Acid Profile: There are slight variations in the amino acid composition, but both provide the essential building blocks (glycine, proline, hydroxyproline) necessary for the body's natural collagen synthesis.

Comparison Table: Wild Collagen vs. True Collagen

Feature Wild (Marine) Collagen True (Bovine) Collagen
Source Wild-caught fish skin and scales Grass-fed bovine hides
Collagen Type(s) Primarily Type I Primarily Type I, with traces of Type III
Sourcing Typically sustainably and ethically sourced, often MSC-certified Ethical, pasture-raised, and free from common allergens
Typical Cost Often slightly more expensive due to processing and sourcing Generally more affordable
Dietary Suitability Pescatarian-friendly, suitable for those avoiding red meat Suitable for those who consume red meat
Allergen Profile Contains fish/shellfish allergens Free from major allergens like fish, shellfish, soy, and dairy
Environmental Impact Sustainable fishing practices are crucial; marine sourcing can be less resource-intensive Ethical farming practices are key to minimizing environmental impact
Absorption Very high, possibly slightly higher due to smaller peptide size Excellent bioavailability; 90% absorbed within hours

Making the Right Choice for You

Deciding which is better, wild collagen or true collagen, is a personal decision based on several factors. Consider the following:

  • Dietary Restrictions: If you avoid red meat, wild marine collagen is the clear choice. If you have fish or shellfish allergies, bovine collagen is the safer option.
  • Sustainability and Ethics: Both wild-caught marine collagen and grass-fed bovine collagen can be sourced ethically. Check for certifications like the MSC (Marine Stewardship Council) for wild collagen to ensure sustainable practices. For bovine, look for certifications regarding grass-fed, pasture-raised, and cruelty-free practices.
  • Cost and Accessibility: Bovine collagen is often more readily available and more cost-effective. If budget is a primary concern, true collagen may be the better starting point.
  • Types of Collagen: While both are excellent for skin and general health, true (bovine) collagen's inclusion of Type III makes it a slightly more comprehensive supplement for those specifically looking to support the structure of their organs and arteries, in addition to skin and bone health.

Can you take both?

Yes, it is possible to take both marine and bovine collagen supplements. Some people choose to alternate or take half-doses of each to ensure they receive a wider spectrum of amino acids and collagen types. This can be a great way to cover all the bases for skin, gut, muscle, bone, and joint health.

Conclusion

When comparing wild collagen to true collagen, the key takeaway is that neither is inherently "better" than the other for overall effectiveness, provided they are both high-quality, hydrolyzed products. The primary differences lie in their source (fish vs. bovine) and the resulting dietary, ethical, and cost implications. For those who avoid red meat, wild marine collagen is the ideal choice. For individuals with fish allergies, true bovine collagen is the way to go. For those with no dietary restrictions, the choice is based entirely on personal preference and your wellness priorities. By understanding the distinctions, you can make an informed decision that best supports your individual health goals. Regardless of your choice, consistency is more important than the exact source for seeing noticeable benefits.

For additional scientific insight into the function of collagen, you can consult reputable sources like the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary difference is the source: wild collagen is sourced from fish (marine), while true collagen is sourced from bovine (cattle).

No, for high-quality hydrolyzed products, the benefits are generally the same for improving skin, joint, and bone health. The choice is more a matter of dietary preference.

While some claim marine collagen has superior absorption due to slightly smaller peptides, both marine and bovine collagen have excellent absorption rates when hydrolyzed, so the difference is not practically significant.

Both wild (marine) and true (bovine) collagen are rich in Type I collagen, which is crucial for skin elasticity and integrity. Therefore, both are excellent options for skin health.

If you have a fish or shellfish allergy, you should choose true (bovine) collagen, as wild (marine) collagen is derived from fish.

Sustainability depends on the supplier's practices for both types. For wild (marine) collagen, look for MSC certification. For true (bovine) collagen, seek out products from ethically raised, grass-fed cattle.

Yes, you can take both marine and bovine collagen supplements, either alternating them or taking them together to get the benefits of both sources.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.