Skip to content

Are you still a vegetarian if you eat insects?

4 min read

An estimated 2 billion people worldwide regularly consume insects, but does embracing this practice align with vegetarian principles? The short answer is no; eating insects means you are no longer a vegetarian, but the debate is far more nuanced than a simple 'yes' or 'no'.

Quick Summary

Eating insects disqualifies a person from being a vegetarian, as insects are animals. The growing practice of entomophagy introduces new ethical considerations related to animal sentience and environmental impact for those seeking alternative protein sources.

Key Points

  • Strictly No: By definition, vegetarianism excludes all animals, and insects are animals. Therefore, eating insects means you are not a vegetarian.

  • New Diet Names: The term 'entotarian' has been coined to describe someone who follows a vegetarian-like diet but includes insects.

  • Ethical Dilemma: Whether insects can feel pain or suffer is a debated scientific topic, which is a key ethical consideration for many deciding on entomophagy.

  • Environmental Benefits: Insect farming has a significantly lower environmental impact (less land, water, and greenhouse gas emissions) compared to traditional livestock production.

  • Nutritional Advantages: Insects are a complete protein source, rich in essential amino acids, B vitamins, and minerals, often with a better nutritional profile than meat.

  • Personal Choice: The decision to eat insects is a personal one, influenced by individual values concerning ethics, health, and environmental impact.

In This Article

Defining Vegetarianism and Insects

At its core, vegetarianism is a dietary practice that excludes meat, fish, and poultry. This definition hinges on the fact that these items are sourced from animals. Since insects are animals—belonging to the largest phylum of the animal kingdom, arthropods—their consumption fundamentally contradicts the principles of a vegetarian diet. Those who choose to incorporate insects often identify with other dietary classifications, such as "entotarian" or "flexitarian," to accurately describe their eating habits.

The Ethical and Philosophical Divide

The reasons for adopting a vegetarian diet are diverse, often including concerns over animal cruelty, environmental sustainability, and personal health. When it comes to eating insects, these motivations lead to a key philosophical divide. For some, the ethical objection is against all forms of animal consumption, regardless of the animal's size or complexity. For others, the perceived low sentience of insects and the comparatively high environmental costs of livestock farming may justify the inclusion of insects in an otherwise plant-based diet.

Many ethical vegetarians believe that killing any animal, sentient or not, for food is wrong. However, the question of insect sentience is a complex, ongoing scientific debate. Studies on insects like fruit flies have shown evidence of chronic pain and emotional-like states, suggesting their experience is more complex than previously thought. Yet, some argue that because insects' nervous systems are far simpler than those of vertebrates, their capacity for suffering is negligible. This unresolved ethical dilemma is central to the vegetarian versus entotarian distinction.

Comparing the Environmental Impact

For vegetarians focused on reducing their environmental footprint, entomophagy presents a compelling case. The environmental costs of traditional livestock farming are immense, including high greenhouse gas emissions, significant land use, and substantial water consumption. In comparison, insect farming requires far fewer resources and produces significantly less waste.

  • Feed Conversion Efficiency: Insects, being cold-blooded, are highly efficient at converting feed into body mass. Crickets, for example, are vastly more efficient than cattle.
  • Resource Use: Producing a kilogram of insect protein uses a fraction of the land and water required for producing the same amount of beef.
  • Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Livestock, particularly cattle, are a major source of greenhouse gases like methane. Insect farming produces minimal emissions in comparison.

This high environmental efficiency is a key reason why environmentally-motivated "entotarians" or "entovegans" make an exception for insects in their diet.

Nutritional Value: Insects vs. Other Proteins

Insects offer a powerful nutritional profile that rivals traditional meat and often surpasses plant-based alternatives in specific areas. They are a complete protein source, providing all essential amino acids, and are rich in vitamins and minerals.

Nutrient Edible Insects (e.g., Crickets) Beef (Traditional) Plant-Based (e.g., Lentils)
Protein High (50-70%) High (Approx. 26%) High (Approx. 25%)
Vitamin B12 High Present Absent
Iron High High (Heme) Present (Non-Heme)
Omega Fatty Acids Present Present Present
Dietary Fiber Present (Chitin) Absent High

This comparison table illustrates that while beef is a strong protein source, insects offer unique benefits like fiber and comparable vitamin B12. Plant-based proteins, while excellent, require careful planning to ensure complete nutrition, particularly concerning Vitamin B12.

The Rise of Entomophagy

Globally, the practice of eating insects, known as entomophagy, is not new. Over 2,000 species are consumed, particularly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. With growing concerns about food security, nutrition, and environmental sustainability, international organizations like the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) are actively promoting insect farming. This has led to the emergence of niche dietary groups and products in Western countries, including processed insect protein powders and cricket-based energy bars. These developments highlight a shift in how alternative protein sources are perceived and consumed.

Is Eating Insects a Step Toward a More Sustainable Future?

For many, including insects in the diet represents a pragmatic compromise. It offers a way to reduce reliance on resource-intensive livestock farming while maintaining access to a complete and nutritious protein source. While this approach is inconsistent with strict vegetarianism, it can serve as a stepping stone for those looking to transition to a more environmentally-friendly diet without fully committing to plant-based restrictions. The existence of terms like "entotarian" reflects a broader movement toward more flexible and mindful eating habits that prioritize health and sustainability, even if they don't fit into traditional vegetarian categories.

Conclusion: Defining Your Dietary Path

The question of whether you are still a vegetarian if you eat insects has a clear, definitional answer: no. However, the motivations behind both vegetarianism and entomophagy are complex and overlapping. For those prioritizing traditional ethical concerns, insects are considered animals and are therefore off the menu. For those focused on environmental sustainability, insects offer a highly efficient and nutrient-dense protein source. Ultimately, an individual's dietary path depends on their specific priorities—whether they adhere strictly to the traditional definition of vegetarianism or explore new classifications like entotarianism to balance ethical, environmental, and nutritional considerations.

For more detailed information on insect cognition and sentience, a comprehensive review of the scientific literature can be found on ScienceDirect in the article titled "Wouldn’t hurt a fly? A review of insect cognition and sentience in the context of edible insect farming".

Frequently Asked Questions

You can't be a vegetarian if you eat insects because insects are classified as animals. The core definition of vegetarianism is the abstention from consuming any animal flesh, which includes all forms of animal life, not just mammals and birds.

A vegan does not consume any animal products whatsoever, including meat, dairy, eggs, and honey, as a result of a philosophy to avoid animal exploitation. A vegetarian avoids meat but may consume dairy or eggs. Both groups typically abstain from eating insects, as they are animals.

This is a subject of debate. Some argue it is more ethical due to insects' potentially lower sentience and the reduced environmental footprint of insect farming. Others contend that killing any animal for food is unethical, regardless of perceived sentience.

Insects offer a highly efficient protein source with low resource requirements, but their overall environmental impact compared to plant-based options depends on the scale and type of production. They are, however, significantly more sustainable than traditional livestock.

The scientific community is still debating this question. Recent research suggests that some insects might experience chronic pain or emotional-like states, though their nervous systems are not the same as vertebrates.

Some commonly consumed edible insects include crickets, mealworms, grasshoppers, ants, beetles, and termites.

If you eat a vegetarian diet with the addition of insects, you might be called an 'entotarian' or 'entovegan'. Alternatively, this practice could fall under the umbrella of 'flexitarianism,' a diet that is primarily vegetarian but allows for some animal products.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.