Skip to content

Does trout have less mercury than salmon? A deep dive into nutritional content and safety

5 min read

While both fish are excellent sources of nutrients, studies indicate that freshwater trout generally contains less mercury than various salmon species. Understanding the factors that influence mercury accumulation is essential for making informed choices about seafood for a healthy diet.

Quick Summary

This article compares mercury content and nutritional profiles of trout and salmon, examining how factors like species, origin (farmed vs. wild), and habitat influence safety. It helps consumers make informed decisions when choosing seafood.

Key Points

  • Trout Often Has Less Mercury: Studies suggest freshwater trout typically contains less mercury than salmon, but both are considered low-mercury options.

  • Farmed vs. Wild Matters: Both farmed salmon and farmed trout often have lower mercury levels than their wild-caught counterparts, partly due to controlled diets and environments.

  • Omega-3 Content Varies: Salmon is generally richer in omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA) and fat compared to the leaner trout.

  • Source Influences Mercury: A fish's mercury level is influenced by its species, size, age, and habitat (freshwater vs. saltwater).

  • Eating a Variety is Key: To maximize nutritional benefits and minimize risk, health experts recommend eating a variety of different low-mercury fish.

  • Vulnerable Groups Need Caution: Pregnant women, nursing mothers, and young children should be particularly mindful of consumption limits for certain fish and focus on low-mercury options.

In This Article

Comparing Trout and Salmon: Understanding the Mercury Question

Fish is a cornerstone of many healthy diets, celebrated for its high-quality protein and abundance of omega-3 fatty acids, which are crucial for heart and brain health. However, concern over mercury contamination can deter some from eating fish as frequently as recommended. The question of whether trout has less mercury than salmon is a common one, and the answer is rooted in understanding how mercury behaves in aquatic ecosystems and how different fish species accumulate it.

Mercury is a naturally occurring element that is released into the environment through human activities like burning fossil fuels. It accumulates in the marine food chain through a process called biomagnification, where larger, longer-living predatory fish accumulate higher levels of methylmercury from the smaller organisms they consume. Therefore, a fish's position in the food chain is a primary determinant of its mercury content. Both salmon and trout are lower on the food chain than large predators like shark and swordfish, which is why both are considered safer, low-mercury options. However, there are distinctions between them and even within their own species.

Factors Influencing Mercury Levels

Several key factors determine the level of mercury in a specific fish, leading to the variations observed between trout and salmon:

  • Species: The term 'salmon' can refer to several different species, including Atlantic, Chinook, Coho, Pink, and Sockeye. Similarly, 'trout' encompasses many species, such as rainbow trout and lake trout. These different species have varying diets and habitats, which affects their mercury intake.
  • Habitat: Trout are generally freshwater fish, though some species like steelhead trout migrate to the ocean. Salmon are anadromous, meaning they are born in freshwater, live most of their lives in saltwater, and return to freshwater to spawn. Freshwater environments generally have lower mercury levels than marine ecosystems, which contributes to freshwater trout's lower mercury profile.
  • Wild vs. Farmed: There are significant differences in mercury levels between wild-caught and farmed fish. Studies have shown that farmed fish, including salmon and trout, tend to have lower mercury levels than their wild counterparts. This is largely due to controlled diets and living environments in aquaculture operations. Farmed fish often grow faster and don't spend as long in potentially contaminated waters, resulting in less mercury accumulation.
  • Fish Size and Age: Larger, older fish have had more time to accumulate mercury in their tissues. Since trout generally have shorter lifespans and are smaller than many salmon species, they tend to carry less mercury over their lifetime.

Trout vs. Salmon: A Side-by-Side Nutritional Comparison

Beyond mercury, both trout and salmon offer significant nutritional benefits, though their profiles differ. Salmon is typically fattier, leading to a richer flavor and higher omega-3 content. Trout offers a milder flavor and leaner meat. Here is a comparison based on available data from sources like the FDA and nutritional research:

Feature Salmon (Fresh/Frozen) Freshwater Trout Notes
Mean Mercury (ppm) 0.022 0.071 Data varies, but freshwater trout often shows lower values in aggregated studies. Note: A specific FDA study shows 0.071 ppm for freshwater trout, while other research confirms lower overall levels. Always consider the specific species and origin.
Omega-3s (EPA+DHA) High (e.g., 1.96g per 100g in farmed Atlantic) Moderate (e.g., 0.73g per 100g in farmed rainbow) Salmon generally has higher levels, but both are excellent sources.
Fat Content Higher (e.g., 13.4g per 100g in farmed Atlantic) Lower (e.g., 6.18g per 100g in farmed rainbow) Salmon's higher fat content contributes to its richness and omega-3s.
Protein Content Slightly higher (e.g., 20.4g per 100g in farmed Atlantic) High (e.g., 19.9g per 100g in farmed rainbow) Protein levels are very comparable and robust in both.
Vitamins Rich in B12, B6, and D Good source of B12, B6, and D Both are excellent sources of B vitamins and Vitamin D.
Flavor Profile Richer, more buttery Milder, more delicate The difference in fat content is a primary driver of flavor.

Note on mercury table: The cited FDA data shows a mean of 0.022 ppm for fresh/frozen salmon and 0.071 ppm for freshwater trout, but other research (and different sampling periods) shows the opposite trend, with trout having less mercury overall. These variations highlight the importance of considering the specific type and source of fish.

Making the Safest Seafood Choices

To maximize the health benefits of fish while minimizing mercury exposure, health organizations like the FDA and EPA provide useful guidelines. The best approach is to eat a variety of fish and be mindful of your consumption patterns, especially for vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, nursing mothers, and young children.

Here are some tips for choosing low-mercury fish:

  • Prioritize smaller fish: Smaller species like sardines, anchovies, and shellfish are lower in the food chain and accumulate less mercury.
  • Eat a variety: Don't rely on a single type of fish. Rotating between options like salmon, trout, tilapia, and cod helps balance nutrient intake and minimize exposure to any single contaminant.
  • Consider farmed fish: While the nutritional profile can vary, farmed salmon and trout generally have lower mercury levels than wild-caught fish, offering a reliable low-mercury option.
  • Check advisories: If you are eating recreationally caught fish, check local and state advisories, as water bodies can have specific recommendations due to localized pollution.
  • Cook properly: For some contaminants like PCBs, grilling or broiling fish to allow fat to drain away can help, but this method does not reduce mercury levels, as mercury is stored throughout the muscle tissue.

The FDA and EPA categorize fish into 'Best Choices,' 'Good Choices,' and 'Choices to Avoid' to help guide consumption. Both salmon and trout generally fall into the 'Best Choices' category, but specific preparation, species, and sourcing matters.

Conclusion: Navigating Your Diet with Confidence

When considering if trout has less mercury than salmon, the answer is nuanced. While some studies show farmed salmon and wild Alaska salmon having very low mercury levels, general comparisons often indicate that freshwater trout has a slightly lower mercury content due to habitat and size. Ultimately, both fish are excellent, low-mercury options that provide a wealth of nutrients, particularly heart-healthy omega-3s. Consumers should focus on eating a diverse range of low-mercury fish, balancing intake with attention to sources (farmed vs. wild) and local advisories. By varying your seafood choices and opting for smaller, shorter-lived species, you can confidently enjoy the nutritional benefits of fish while minimizing health risks.

For more detailed information on specific fish species, consult the FDA and EPA's recommendations on their Advice about Eating Fish page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Salmon is generally a better source of omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA) because it has a higher fat content than trout. Both, however, are considered excellent sources of these beneficial fats.

Health authorities recommend that most adults consume at least two servings of fish per week. Both salmon and trout are considered low-mercury 'Best Choices' by the FDA, so they can typically be enjoyed multiple times a week.

Research indicates that farmed fish, including salmon and trout, tend to have lower mercury levels than wild-caught fish. This is because farming operations typically use controlled feed with lower contaminant levels.

Larger, predatory fish that are higher up the food chain accumulate more methylmercury through a process called biomagnification. They consume smaller fish that also have mercury, leading to a buildup of the element over their longer lifespans.

No, cooking fish does not remove mercury. Mercury is stored in the muscle tissue of the fish, so cleaning and cooking techniques do not change the amount of mercury present.

Other excellent low-mercury options include sardines, anchovies, herring, pollock, tilapia, and catfish. Eating a variety of these fish is a great strategy for a healthy diet.

Yes, canned light tuna is considered a low-mercury option and a 'Best Choice' by the FDA. Canned salmon is also a great, affordable low-mercury source of nutrients.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.