Core differences in nutritional information
Both the US and EU provide essential nutritional data, but their presentation and required details differ significantly.
Serving size vs. 100g/ml standards
In the US, the "Nutrition Facts" panel uses manufacturer-determined serving sizes. This can be confusing if a package contains multiple servings or serving sizes don't match consumption habits. The EU requires nutritional values per 100 grams or 100 milliliters, offering a consistent metric for comparison across products.
Sodium vs. salt content
US labels list sodium in milligrams, while EU labels list salt in grams. This difference requires awareness as salt contains sodium, but the reported values are not directly interchangeable.
The divergent approach to ingredients and additives
US and European food labeling reflects differing regulatory philosophies regarding additives, leading to substances allowed in one region but banned or labeled differently in the other.
Precautionary principle vs. risk-based approach
The EU follows a "precautionary principle," restricting or banning additives if their safety is in question until proven safe. The US uses a "risk-based approach," generally permitting an additive until the FDA finds evidence of harm. This explains why many EU-banned additives, like certain artificial food dyes, are permitted in the US.
Additive labeling: E-numbers vs. common names
EU-approved additives are assigned an "E-number" for a concise list. US regulations require additives to be listed by their full common name. Products with E-numbers need relabeling for sale in the US.
Labeling of specific food types
Regulations for organic products, GMOs, and oils also show differences.
Organic and GMO transparency
Europe has stricter GMO labeling, requiring disclosure for products with over 0.9% GMOs. The US uses the term "bioengineered" for disclosure, which is considered less transparent. Organic standards are generally equivalent, but minor differences exist, such as the USDA banning antibiotics in organic meat while the EU allows limited therapeutic use.
Declaration of oils
EU law requires specific vegetable oils like palm or olive oil to be named. In the US, manufacturers can use the general term "vegetable oil".
Comparison table: US vs. Europe food labels
| Feature | United States (FDA) | European Union (EFSA) | 
|---|---|---|
| Serving Size | Based on manufacturer-determined serving sizes. | Standardized per 100g or 100ml. | 
| Additives | Labeled by full common name; risk-based regulation. | Labeled with "E-number"; precautionary principle regulation. | 
| Salt/Sodium | Lists sodium content in milligrams (mg). | Lists salt content in grams (g). | 
| Oils | Can be listed generically as "vegetable oil". | Specific vegetable oils must be named. | 
| Allergens | Common allergens listed; derivatives may not be highlighted individually. | Every instance of an allergen or its derivatives is individually highlighted. | 
| GMOs | Less strict labeling, using "bioengineered". | Strict labeling required if GMO content > 0.9%. | 
| Organic | Equivalent standards with minor differences (e.g., antibiotic use). | Equivalent standards with minor differences (e.g., animal welfare). | 
Conclusion
Comparing food labels in the US and Europe reveals distinct regulatory philosophies. The EU's precautionary principle results in stricter rules for additives and greater transparency for GMOs and certain oils, while the US uses a different format for nutritional information and additive labeling. Understanding these differences helps consumers navigate global food markets and make informed choices.
For more detailed information on European food safety regulations, you can refer to the official European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) website.