Skip to content

Is Himalayan Salt as Good as Real Salt? A Nutritional Deep Dive

4 min read

Over 75% of our dietary sodium comes from processed foods, making the choice of table salt seem insignificant, yet many wonder about premium varieties. But when it comes to unrefined options like Himalayan and Real Salt, a common question arises: Is Himalayan salt as good as real salt from a nutritional standpoint? The answer lies in their origins, processing, and the tiny—but well-marketed—differences in their mineral profiles.

Quick Summary

Himalayan salt and Real Salt are both unrefined, mineral-rich salts from ancient deposits, but they differ in geographical origin and subtle flavor notes. The often-touted nutritional benefits of their trace minerals are largely negligible in typical consumption amounts. The final choice comes down to personal taste, sourcing, and awareness of iodine content.

Key Points

  • Nutritional Equivalence: For practical dietary purposes, the tiny trace mineral differences between Himalayan salt and Real Salt are nutritionally insignificant.

  • Unrefined and Additive-Free: Both salts are unrefined products, meaning they are free of the anti-caking agents and other additives found in standard table salt.

  • Flavor and Texture: Real Salt is often described as slightly sweeter, while Himalayan salt has an earthier taste, though both offer distinct flavors and textures depending on the crystal size.

  • Geographical Difference: Himalayan salt is sourced from Pakistan, while Real Salt is a product of Utah, USA, making the latter a more geographically sustainable choice for North American consumers.

  • Lacking Iodine: Neither Himalayan nor Real Salt is a reliable source of iodine, a critical nutrient typically added to table salt to prevent deficiencies.

  • Sodium Content is Similar: Despite having a different appearance, the sodium chloride content of both salts is similar by weight, and moderation is key regardless of which you choose.

In This Article

The Rise of Artisanal Salts in the Nutrition Diet

In recent years, the spotlight on whole foods and natural ingredients has shifted attention toward alternatives to standard, refined table salt. Brands like Himalayan salt and Real Salt have gained popularity, marketed as purer, healthier options brimming with trace minerals. While regular table salt is heavily processed and often contains additives and added iodine, unrefined salts claim to offer a more natural profile. The core of the debate, however, rests on whether the nutritional differences are significant enough to warrant the premium price and hype.

What Is Himalayan Salt?

Himalayan pink salt is a type of rock salt, or halite, mined from the Khewra Salt Mine in the Punjab region of Pakistan, located near the foothills of the Himalayas. This ancient salt bed was formed millions of years ago, and its signature pink color comes from its trace iron oxide content. It is hand-extracted and minimally processed, preserving its crystalline structure and trace mineral content. While often celebrated for containing up to 84 trace minerals, it's important to remember that these minerals only make up about 2% of the salt, with the vast majority being sodium chloride.

What Is Real Salt?

Real Salt is a brand-name salt harvested from an ancient, underground salt deposit in Redmond, Utah. Like Himalayan salt, it is an unrefined sea salt from an ancient body of water and is packed with natural minerals. The company touts its salt as being protected from modern pollutants and untouched by processing, resulting in a mineral-rich product with a slightly sweeter flavor profile compared to the earthier taste of Himalayan salt. For North American consumers, Real Salt also presents a more sustainable option due to its significantly shorter shipping distance from its mine to the table.

Key Nutritional Differences and Similarities

At their core, both Himalayan and Real Salt are very similar. Both are overwhelmingly composed of sodium chloride (NaCl)—around 98% for Himalayan and slightly higher for Real Salt. The primary nutritional difference lies in the minute quantities of trace minerals. While Real Salt claims a "full spectrum" of minerals, comparative analysis shows that both salts contain trace amounts of minerals like calcium, potassium, and magnesium. The key takeaway from most nutritional experts is that these trace minerals exist in such small concentrations that they offer no significant health benefits in the quantities typically consumed. You would need to consume a dangerously high amount of salt to gain any meaningful nutritional value from these traces.

The Iodine Consideration

One significant difference that is often overlooked is the lack of iodine in both unrefined salts. Many countries fortify table salt with iodine to combat iodine deficiency, a common nutritional issue that can affect thyroid health. Those who switch exclusively to an un-iodized salt, whether Himalayan or Real Salt, must ensure they get enough iodine from other dietary sources, such as seafood, seaweed, and dairy products. Forgoing iodized salt without a diet rich in alternative iodine sources can lead to a deficiency.

Comparison Table: Himalayan Salt vs. Real Salt

Feature Himalayan Salt Real Salt (Redmond)
Origin Khewra Salt Mine, Pakistan Redmond, Utah, USA
Processing Minimally processed, hand-extracted Unrefined, natural harvesting
Mineral Content 98% Sodium Chloride, 2% trace minerals (iron oxide, calcium, potassium) Mineral-rich from ancient deposit, contains trace minerals
Flavor Profile Earthier taste Slightly sweeter taste
Sodium Content Similar sodium content by weight, less per teaspoon due to larger crystal size Similar sodium content by weight, less per teaspoon due to larger crystal size
Sustainability (for US consumers) Higher carbon footprint due to international shipping Lower carbon footprint due to local sourcing
Additives No additives or anti-caking agents No additives or anti-caking agents
Iodine Not a reliable source of iodine Not a reliable source of iodine

Deciding Which Salt to Choose

With the negligible nutritional advantage of the trace minerals in both products, the choice between Himalayan salt and Real Salt comes down to other factors. Both are superior to heavily processed table salt if your goal is to avoid additives and anti-caking agents. They also offer a different flavor experience, which can be a fun culinary experiment. The coarseness of both salts can also influence cooking; larger crystals may provide a nice texture and can help reduce sodium intake simply because less salt fits into a measuring spoon.

Beyond taste, ethical and environmental considerations might sway your decision. For American consumers, Real Salt has a significantly smaller carbon footprint due to its domestic sourcing. Ultimately, a balanced diet is more crucial for obtaining essential minerals than relying on salt alone, as the Center for Science in the Public Interest points out.

Important things to remember about salt:

  • Moderation is key: Regardless of the type, excessive sodium intake is linked to high blood pressure and other health issues. The American Heart Association recommends limiting daily sodium intake to 2,300mg.
  • Consider iodine needs: If switching from iodized table salt, ensure your diet provides sufficient iodine from other sources.
  • Embrace variety: Both salts can be used for different culinary purposes, such as a finishing salt for texture (coarse crystals) or in cooking (finer grinds).

Conclusion

In the debate over whether Is Himalayan salt as good as real salt?, the verdict is that for most nutritional purposes, they are equally good and similar. Both are unrefined, natural products free of additives. The difference in trace mineral content is nutritionally insignificant, and neither provides the iodine found in fortified table salt. The choice is primarily one of taste, culinary application, and personal preference regarding sourcing. Focusing on a balanced diet rich in whole foods remains the most reliable way to obtain the full spectrum of essential minerals and nutrients. For more on salt, see the Healthline article on Pink Himalayan Salt.

Frequently Asked Questions

There is no scientific evidence that either Himalayan salt or Real Salt is significantly better for your health than the other. Both are unrefined salts with negligible nutritional differences in the small amounts typically consumed. The most important health consideration is overall sodium intake, not the specific type of salt.

Both Himalayan salt and Real Salt contain trace minerals, with slight variations. However, the quantities are so small that they offer no measurable health benefit. You would have to consume an unhealthy amount of either salt to absorb any meaningful amount of these extra minerals.

No. Neither Himalayan salt nor Real Salt is a reliable source of iodine. Iodine is typically added to refined table salt to prevent deficiency. If you use an un-iodized salt, you must get this essential mineral from other foods.

Both salts are considered minimally processed and unrefined. They come from ancient salt beds and are harvested with little intervention compared to modern, highly refined table salt.

According to producers, Real Salt has a slightly sweeter flavor, while Himalayan salt is described as having an earthier profile. These subtle flavor differences are largely due to their specific mineral compositions.

As Real Salt is mined in Utah, it has a significantly shorter shipping distance to North American consumers than Himalayan salt, which comes from Pakistan. This results in a smaller carbon footprint for transport.

Yes, you can generally use them interchangeably. The primary difference will be the texture and a subtle flavor change. The size of the crystal should be considered, as larger crystals may require a different quantity to achieve the same level of saltiness as a finer grind.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.