Skip to content

Is Splenda Safer Than Stevia? A Comparison of Zero-Calorie Sweeteners

3 min read

According to a 2024 study in Medical News Today, both Splenda (sucralose) and stevia are generally considered safe for use in moderation, though research on long-term effects is ongoing. The question of is Splenda safer than Stevia often depends on personal health goals and sensitivities.

Quick Summary

This article compares Splenda (sucralose) and purified stevia extracts, examining their origins, processing, and potential health effects, including impacts on gut health, blood sugar, and safety for cooking. It highlights that while both are FDA-approved, stevia often has fewer associated health concerns, although both may affect gut bacteria.

Key Points

  • Origins: Stevia is a natural sweetener from a plant, while Splenda (sucralose) is an artificial, chemically modified sweetener.

  • Safety Concerns: Purified stevia has fewer reported health concerns, but long-term effects of both sweeteners are still being researched, especially regarding gut health.

  • Heat Stability: Stevia is more stable at high temperatures, making it a safer option for baking compared to sucralose, which can break down into potentially harmful compounds.

  • Gut Health: Both sweeteners may negatively impact the gut microbiome, with some animal studies showing clearer adverse effects from sucralose.

  • Blood Sugar: While both are zero-calorie, some studies suggest Splenda's bulking agents can cause blood sugar spikes in certain individuals, while pure stevia may have beneficial effects on blood sugar.

  • Individual Needs: The best choice depends on personal tolerance, dietary goals, and intended use, with moderation being key for either option.

In This Article

Origins and Processing: Natural vs. Artificial

When comparing Splenda and stevia, a key distinction lies in their source and manufacturing process. Stevia is a natural sweetener derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant, which has been used as a sweetener for centuries. Its intense sweetness comes from compounds called steviol glycosides, which are extracted and purified. While the raw, whole-leaf form of stevia is not approved by the FDA for use in foods, the highly purified stevia extract (Rebaudioside A or Reb-A) is.

Splenda, on the other hand, is a brand name for sucralose, an artificial sweetener. It is not a natural product. Sucralose is created in a lab by chemically altering a sugar molecule, replacing three hydrogen-oxygen groups with chlorine atoms. This modification makes it about 600 times sweeter than sugar and indigestible by the human body, so it passes through without adding calories. The final product, Splenda, often includes bulking agents like dextrose and maltodextrin to make it easier to measure.

Potential Health Effects and Controversies

Both sweeteners have faced scrutiny regarding their health impacts. While the FDA considers highly purified stevia extract to be "Generally Recognized as Safe" (GRAS), long-term studies are still needed to fully understand all effects. Some research suggests stevia may offer benefits like lowering cholesterol and stabilizing blood sugar, though these findings need more investigation. However, whole-leaf or crude stevia extracts are not approved for consumption due to a lack of safety research. Side effects for some individuals, particularly those sensitive to sugar alcohols in some blends, can include bloating, nausea, and digestive discomfort.

Sucralose also has its share of controversies. Despite FDA approval in 1998, subsequent research has raised questions. Potential concerns for sucralose include its possible effect on gut bacteria and the formation of potentially harmful compounds when heated. Some animal studies have also linked high doses of sucralose to inflammation and damage to internal organs, though more human research is needed.

Impact on Gut Microbiome

Emerging research indicates that both sweeteners might affect the balance of bacteria in the gut. A healthy gut microbiome is crucial for overall health, and disruption (dysbiosis) has been linked to various health issues. Animal studies suggest sucralose may decrease beneficial gut bacteria. Likewise, some studies on stevia show potential for minor disruptions in gut flora, though results vary and require more human-based research to confirm. This potential impact on gut health is a key consideration for consumers.

Comparison Table: Splenda vs. Stevia

Feature Splenda (Sucralose) Stevia (Purified Extract)
Origin Artificial; chemically modified from sugar Natural; derived from the Stevia rebaudiana plant
Processing Chemical synthesis in a lab Water-based extraction and purification
Calorie Content Technically zero-calorie, though packets contain negligible calories from fillers Zero-calorie
Sweetness Level Up to 600 times sweeter than sugar Up to 300 times sweeter than sugar
Taste Profile Closely mimics sugar, no bitter aftertaste for most users Mild licorice-like taste with a slight bitter aftertaste for some
Cooking Stability Concerns exist about potential harmful compounds forming at high temperatures (above 350°F / 175°C) Heat-stable and suitable for baking
Potential Gut Impact Animal studies suggest negative effects on gut bacteria, human data is conflicting Some studies show potential for minor, strain-specific changes in gut flora
Regulatory Status FDA approved Highly purified extract is FDA-approved (GRAS)

Conclusion: Which is the "Safer" Choice?

Based on current research, purified stevia extract is often considered the safer option due to its natural origin and the fewer health concerns surrounding it, especially regarding heat stability and potential for carcinogenic byproducts. Stevia's potential antioxidant and blood sugar-stabilizing effects may also offer additional benefits, though more research is required. However, it is important to remember that many packaged stevia products also contain fillers and sugar alcohols that can cause digestive issues or slight blood sugar increases. Splenda, while FDA-approved, has more conflicting research regarding its long-term effects on the gut microbiome and potential risks when used for high-temperature cooking. Ultimately, both should be used in moderation as a substitute for sugar, rather than as a health food. The "safest" choice will depend on individual health profiles and intended usage. Consulting a healthcare professional can help you make the best choice for your dietary needs. For general health information, authoritative sources like Healthline provide reliable overviews.


This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Please consult a healthcare professional before making any significant dietary changes.

Frequently Asked Questions

For diabetics, purified stevia extract is generally considered the better option because it may help stabilize blood sugar levels and has potential antidiabetic properties, unlike some of the bulking agents in Splenda which can cause spikes.

Yes, you can bake with both, but stevia is generally considered safer for high-temperature cooking. Research has raised concerns that heating Splenda (sucralose) above certain temperatures may produce harmful compounds.

Possible side effects of stevia can include bloating, nausea, and digestive issues for those sensitive to the sugar alcohols often used as fillers in stevia blends. In rare cases, some may experience dizziness or numbness.

Some animal studies suggest that Splenda (sucralose) may reduce beneficial gut bacteria and negatively alter the gut microbiome. While human data is inconclusive, it is a point of ongoing research.

Not necessarily. While purified stevia extract is considered safe and comes from a natural source, whole-leaf or crude stevia extracts are not FDA-approved and lack sufficient safety research. The processing and purity level are critical factors.

Many zero-calorie sweetener products, including some stevia and Splenda blends, contain sugar alcohols (e.g., erythritol) or other fillers like maltodextrin. For some individuals, these can cause bloating, gas, and laxative effects when consumed in large quantities.

While both sweeteners are calorie-free, research on their impact on weight management is mixed. Some studies suggest that the intense sweetness of non-nutritive sweeteners may increase cravings for sweets or not provide the satiety cues of real sugar, potentially leading to increased overall calorie intake.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.