Skip to content

Is Splenda Stevia the Same as Regular Splenda?

4 min read

According to the brand itself, Splenda Stevia is a completely different product from regular Splenda, despite sharing a brand name. In fact, the two sweeteners are derived from distinct sources: one is an artificial compound, while the other is plant-based. An understanding of their differences is key for making informed dietary decisions.

Quick Summary

Splenda Stevia and regular Splenda are distinct zero-calorie sweeteners. Regular Splenda is an artificial sweetener made from sucralose, whereas Splenda Stevia is a natural, plant-based sweetener derived from the stevia plant. Their differences in origin, chemical makeup, taste, and suitability for high-heat cooking distinguish them for consumers.

Key Points

  • Different Core Ingredients: Regular Splenda is based on the artificial sweetener sucralose, while Splenda Stevia is derived from the natural stevia plant.

  • Distinct Tastes: Regular Splenda offers a clean, sugar-like taste, whereas Splenda Stevia can have a slight licorice aftertaste.

  • Varying Heat Stability: Stevia is more heat-stable and better suited for baking than sucralose, which can potentially break down at high temperatures.

  • Different Bulking Agents: Granulated regular Splenda contains maltodextrin and dextrose, while Splenda Stevia blends often use sugar alcohols like erythritol.

  • Natural vs. Artificial: The choice depends on consumer preference for a naturally derived versus a chemically created sweetener.

  • Dietary Considerations: Keto dieters and those sensitive to blood sugar spikes should be mindful of the bulking agents in both products.

  • Personal Preference Matters: The best choice ultimately depends on individual taste and dietary goals, as both are safe when used in moderation.

In This Article

The Core Difference: Ingredient Origin

Many consumers are unaware that Splenda is a brand name encompassing several different sweetener products, not a single ingredient. The most significant difference between regular Splenda and Splenda Stevia lies in their primary sweetening component. Regular Splenda, famously found in the yellow packets, is made with sucralose, a chemically modified form of sugar. On the other hand, Splenda Stevia, typically sold in green packaging, is a blend derived from the leaves of the stevia plant, making it a natural sweetener.

Regular Splenda (Sucralose)

  • Origin: Artificial. It is created in a lab by replacing some of the atoms in a sugar molecule with chlorine atoms.
  • Taste Profile: Tends to have a clean, sugar-like taste with no or minimal aftertaste for many users, though some report a slight chemical flavor.
  • Potency: It is highly potent, up to 600 times sweeter than table sugar, so only a small amount is needed.
  • Composition: Granulated versions contain bulking agents like maltodextrin and dextrose, which can add a minimal number of calories and carbohydrates per serving.

Splenda Stevia

  • Origin: Natural. It is made from steviol glycosides extracted from the leaves of the stevia plant.
  • Taste Profile: Can have a slightly bitter or licorice-like aftertaste, though brands like Splenda have worked to minimize this.
  • Potency: It is also very sweet, about 200-350 times sweeter than sugar.
  • Composition: As a blend, it often contains other plant-based ingredients or sugar alcohols like erythritol to balance the sweetness and add bulk.

Taste and Cooking Considerations

Beyond their origins, the taste and ideal uses for regular Splenda and Splenda Stevia differ. The flavor profile of regular Splenda (sucralose) is often perceived as more consistently sugar-like, which appeals to many consumers. However, stevia’s taste can be more polarizing due to its distinct aftertaste, which some find unpleasant. This difference in flavor can be a deciding factor for personal preference.

When it comes to cooking and baking, there are also important distinctions. Regular Splenda is considered heat-stable by the FDA, but some research suggests it may break down at high temperatures and produce potentially harmful byproducts. In contrast, stevia's plant compounds are known to be heat-stable and are generally considered a safer option for baking. It is important to remember that replacing sugar with a high-intensity sweetener in baking will also require adjusting for the bulk and moisture that sugar provides, as these sweeteners do not offer the same structure.

Health Impacts and Dietary Suitability

For those managing health conditions like diabetes or following specific diets like keto, the ingredients in these sweeteners have different implications. While neither sucralose nor purified stevia directly raises blood sugar, the bulking agents in granulated products can matter. Regular Splenda's maltodextrin can cause a small spike in blood glucose for some individuals. Similarly, some stevia blends containing erythritol have been linked to potential cardiovascular concerns, though pure stevia does not contain it.

Research on the long-term health effects of both sweeteners is ongoing and, at times, inconclusive. Some animal studies have linked high doses of sucralose to potential health risks, while long-term human studies are still being conducted. Purified stevia extract is generally recognized as safe, though whole-leaf stevia and crude extracts are not FDA approved for use in foods. Ultimately, both should be used in moderation as part of a healthy diet.

Splenda vs. Splenda Stevia: A Comparison Table

Feature Regular Splenda (Yellow Packet) Splenda Stevia (Green Packet)
Primary Sweetener Sucralose Steviol Glycosides (from stevia leaf)
Origin Artificial/Synthetic Natural (Plant-based)
Sweetness Level Up to 600x sweeter than sugar 200-350x sweeter than sugar
Taste Profile Neutral, similar to sugar, but some note a chemical aftertaste Can have a slightly bitter or licorice-like aftertaste
Heat Stability Generally stable, but some research shows potential breakdown at high heat Very heat-stable, suitable for baking
Bulking Agents Maltodextrin, Dextrose Often Erythritol or other plant-based fillers
Keto-Friendliness Can be problematic due to maltodextrin Generally more keto-friendly, especially pure forms
Packaging Color Yellow Green

Conclusion

To conclude, Splenda Stevia is not the same as regular Splenda. The primary distinction is their core ingredient and origin: regular Splenda is an artificial sweetener (sucralose), while Splenda Stevia is a natural, plant-based one. This difference impacts their taste profile, suitability for high-temperature cooking, and potential minor health implications related to added bulking agents. The choice between them comes down to a consumer's preference for an artificial versus natural ingredient, taste tolerance for the aftertaste, and specific dietary needs or health goals. For a more detailed guide on these and other sweeteners, a reliable resource is the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's information on high-intensity sweeteners.

Are you ready to choose your sweetener?

After reviewing the key differences, consider which option aligns with your personal preferences and dietary needs. If you prioritize a cleaner, more sugar-like taste with minimal aftertaste, regular Splenda may be preferable. However, if a plant-based origin is a priority and you don't mind the potential for a subtle licorice note, Splenda Stevia is the more natural choice. For baking, the better heat stability of stevia may make it a superior option, while keto dieters may need to pay closer attention to the filler ingredients in regular Splenda. Always read the packaging to understand the full ingredient list and make the most informed decision for your health and diet.

The Final Verdict

Ultimately, neither option is inherently superior, as both are approved for use and considered safe in moderation. By understanding the specific ingredients and potential effects, you can select the product that best fits your lifestyle. What one person considers the ideal sugar substitute, another might find disappointing, so personal experimentation and awareness are your best tools in this journey.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, Splenda Stevia products do not contain sucralose. They are made from steviol glycosides, which are extracted from the leaves of the stevia plant. The original Splenda, in the yellow packet, is the one that contains sucralose.

The perception of 'healthier' is subjective. Purified stevia is associated with fewer potential adverse health effects in some studies, but long-term research is still ongoing for both. Some find stevia's plant-based origin more appealing than regular Splenda's artificial nature, but both are approved as safe when used in moderation.

Yes, Splenda Stevia is generally suitable for baking, as its sweetening compounds are heat-stable. Regular Splenda (sucralose) is also used for baking but has been shown to potentially degrade at very high temperatures, producing potentially harmful compounds.

Stevia extract, particularly in less refined forms, can have a slight licorice-like or bitter aftertaste. Splenda and other manufacturers work to minimize this by using highly purified extracts and blending them with other ingredients to create a more balanced flavor.

Splenda Stevia is generally a better choice for a strict keto diet, especially in its pure liquid form. Granulated regular Splenda contains maltodextrin, which can impact blood sugar and potentially knock a person out of ketosis.

The core sweetening agents (sucralose and steviol glycosides) do not significantly affect blood sugar levels. However, the bulking agents in granulated versions, such as maltodextrin in regular Splenda and erythritol in some stevia blends, can have effects on blood glucose or have potential cardiovascular risks, respectively.

Regular Splenda (sucralose) is more potent, being around 600 times sweeter than sugar. Splenda Stevia is also very sweet, but less so, at 200-350 times sweeter than sugar, meaning you may need slightly more to achieve the same sweetness level.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.