Skip to content

Is Sugarcane Reb M the Same as Stevia?

4 min read

While both offer zero calories, a 2024 study showed Reb M, when made via fermentation, can offer a more sugar-like taste than some stevia extracts. The answer to "is sugarcane Reb M the same as stevia?" is no, though they are closely related compounds, with the primary difference being their source and manufacturing process.

Quick Summary

Sugarcane Reb M and stevia are not the same product, but share a key sweetening molecule. Stevia refers to the whole plant extract, while Reb M can be produced from either the stevia leaf or fermented sugarcane. The production method influences taste and cost, with fermented sugarcane Reb M offering a cleaner, more sugar-like profile.

Key Points

  • Source of Origin: Stevia comes from the Stevia rebaudiana plant, while sugarcane Reb M is made via fermentation of sugarcane.

  • Molecular Identity: Both products contain the Reb M molecule, but the manufacturing method is different.

  • Taste Difference: Sugarcane Reb M provides a cleaner, more sugar-like taste, while typical stevia extracts (high in Reb A) can have a bitter aftertaste.

  • Production Method: Sugarcane Reb M uses a fermentation process, which is more scalable and consistent than extracting the scarce Reb M from stevia leaves.

  • Cost and Supply: The fermentation method makes Reb M more cost-effective and ensures a stable, high-purity supply compared to the expensive, low-yield extraction from the stevia plant.

  • Zero Calories: Both are zero-calorie sweeteners and have no effect on blood sugar levels.

  • Market Availability: Fermented sugarcane Reb M is increasingly used by food and beverage companies for premium products.

  • Labeling and Non-GMO Status: The use of genetically engineered yeast in fermentation raises debates about the "natural" label, though manufacturers argue the final product is bio-identical and natural.

In This Article

Understanding the Origins: Stevia vs. Sugarcane Fermentation

To understand why sugarcane Reb M is not the same as stevia, one must first appreciate the nuance of their origins. The term "stevia" often refers to the extract from the Stevia rebaudiana plant, which contains numerous sweet compounds called steviol glycosides. The most abundant of these is Reb A, which provides intense sweetness but can have a bitter or licorice-like aftertaste.

Rebaudioside M (Reb M) is a different, much rarer steviol glycoside also found in the stevia plant. It is highly prized for its clean, sugar-like taste and lack of bitter aftertaste. However, extracting Reb M directly from the plant is extremely costly and inefficient due to its low concentration.

This is where innovative biotechnology comes in, leading to the creation of sugarcane Reb M. Instead of extracting it from the stevia leaf, companies have engineered microorganisms, typically yeast, to ferment sugarcane sugar into the exact same Reb M molecule. This process allows for efficient, large-scale, and cost-effective production of the pure, high-quality Reb M compound without relying on the limited supply from the stevia plant.

A Closer Look at the Differences

Though they share a key component, the two sources of Reb M result in distinct products. The most significant difference lies in their taste profile and manufacturing process. Traditional stevia extracts, rich in Reb A, are known for their sweet yet sometimes bitter flavor profile. Sugarcane Reb M, being a more purified product, offers a cleaner, more consistent sugar-like sweetness.

Fermentation vs. Plant Extraction

  • Fermentation-based production: This method uses microorganisms to convert a sugar source, like sugarcane, into Reb M. The final product is a highly pure, zero-calorie sweetener that is bio-identical to the Reb M found in the stevia leaf but does not contain any other steviol glycosides that might affect the taste.
  • Plant-based extraction: Traditional stevia extracts are made by soaking and purifying the leaves of the stevia plant. This process yields a mix of different steviol glycosides, with varying purity levels, which can influence the final flavor.

The "Natural" Debate

Consumers seeking a "natural" label for their sweeteners have sparked a debate surrounding fermented sugarcane Reb M. Some argue that since the fermentation process uses genetically engineered yeast, the resulting product should not be considered natural or non-GMO. However, many manufacturers contend that because the yeast is filtered out and the final Reb M molecule is bio-identical to the one in the stevia plant, it is a natural ingredient. The non-GMO status often depends on the sourcing of the feedstock (sugarcane or corn sugar) and local regulations, leading to varying labeling.

Comparison Table: Sugarcane Reb M vs. Stevia Extract

Feature Sugarcane Reb M Stevia Extract
Primary Source Fermented sugarcane via engineered yeast. Leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant.
Sweetening Compound Highly pure Reb M (Rebaudioside M). A mix of steviol glycosides, predominantly Reb A.
Taste Profile Very clean, round, and sugar-like with minimal to no bitter aftertaste. Can have a slightly bitter or licorice-like aftertaste, especially at higher concentrations.
Manufacturing Process Biotechnology-based fermentation. Traditional leaf extraction and purification.
Cost More cost-effective to produce on a large scale than extracting Reb M from leaves. Cost-effective for Reb A, but expensive for high-purity Reb M.
Sustainability Requires less land and water than traditional stevia farming for the same Reb M output. Uses more agricultural resources for high-purity Reb M.
Consistency Highly consistent, ensuring reliable flavor. May have slight variations depending on the extract's glycoside profile.

Applications in Food and Beverages

Because of its superior taste profile, Reb M is highly sought after by food and beverage manufacturers. It is particularly effective in products where taste is paramount and any off-notes from other sweeteners would be noticeable. For instance, Reb M is used in:

  • Carbonated beverages
  • Dairy products like yogurts and ice cream
  • Baked goods
  • Tabletop sweeteners
  • Protein powders

Conventional stevia extracts, particularly those dominated by Reb A, are still widely used, especially in blends where their lower cost is advantageous. Manufacturers often combine different steviol glycosides or add other ingredients to mask the off-tastes associated with Reb A. This versatility allows the stevia family of sweeteners to be used across a broad range of products, catering to different taste preferences and price points.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the sweetening compound Reb M can be found in the stevia plant, sugarcane Reb M is not the same as stevia. It is a modern, bio-identical form of Reb M created through the fermentation of sugarcane. This advanced manufacturing process addresses the taste and cost limitations of extracting Reb M directly from the stevia leaf, offering a cleaner, more sugar-like taste profile for a wider range of food and beverage products. Consumers can now choose between traditional stevia extracts, with their characteristic flavor profile, or the newer fermented sugarcane Reb M, known for its consistency and clean taste. The market for natural zero-calorie sweeteners continues to evolve, providing more options than ever before for managing sugar intake without sacrificing flavor.

References

: https://ritual.com/articles/ritual-reb-m : https://trulabs.com/blogs/tru-blog/what-is-sugarcane-reb-m : https://javvycoffee.com/support/questions/what-is-reb-m-onosweet-tm : https://amyris.com/ingredient/rebm : https://pyureorganic.com/blogs/commercial-sweetener-ingredients-blog/reb-a-reb-m-reb-d-prime-stevia-commercial-sweeteners : https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/News/Promotional-features/New-stevia-sweetener-BESTEVIA-R-Reb-M-may-disrupt-the-sugar-industry/ : https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-reb-m-exploring-stevia-compound-changing-game-nutramax--afskc : https://www.steviaworld.ca/rebaudiosides : https://www.cargill.com/food-beverage/na/eversweet-faqs : https://www.amazon.com/stores/Purecane/page/171B255D-AC9E-4538-A16F-5B3DE4C21FC4 : https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-reb-m-exploring-stevia-compound-changing-game-nutramax--afskc : https://www.steviaworld.ca/rebaudiosides : https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-reb-m-exploring-stevia-compound-changing-game-nutramax--afskc

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, many manufacturers classify fermented sugarcane Reb M as natural because the end product is a bio-identical Reb M molecule that also exists in nature. The fermentation process uses yeast to create the molecule, rather than a chemical synthesis.

No, sugarcane Reb M is prized specifically for its clean, sugar-like taste with no bitter aftertaste. This is because it is a highly pure form of the Reb M molecule, whereas conventional stevia extracts can contain other glycosides like Reb A that cause bitterness.

Fermented sugarcane Reb M is generally considered more sustainable because it requires significantly less agricultural land and water to produce the same amount of sweetener compared to extracting the scarce Reb M from stevia leaves.

Yes, fermented sugarcane Reb M is a zero-calorie sweetener and does not affect blood glucose levels. It is a safe and suitable option for individuals managing diabetes.

Reb A is a common steviol glycoside found in the stevia plant that can have a bitter aftertaste. Reb M is a rarer steviol glycoside with a clean, sugar-like taste. Due to its rarity, Reb M is often produced via fermentation.

The sweetness comes from the Rebaudioside M molecule, a steviol glycoside. In the case of fermented sugarcane Reb M, microorganisms like yeast are used to convert the sugar from sugarcane into the Reb M molecule during fermentation.

No, the yeast used in the fermentation process is filtered out during purification. The final product is just the pure Reb M molecule.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.