Skip to content

Is Vegetable Shortening Inflammatory? The Truth About Modern Fats

4 min read

In recent decades, awareness about the negative health effects of certain fats has surged, with studies linking trans fats to inflammation and heart disease. This has led many to question the ingredients in processed foods, including the popular baking staple—is vegetable shortening inflammatory?

Quick Summary

Examines the link between vegetable shortening and inflammation, detailing the historical issue with trans fats, the shift to modern interesterified fats, and evaluating the overall health impact of this common processed ingredient.

Key Points

  • Past vs. Present: Historically, vegetable shortening was inflammatory due to artificial trans fats from partial hydrogenation, now banned by the FDA.

  • Modern Uncertainty: New formulations use interesterified fats, which have raised concerns about potential inflammatory effects based on some animal studies, though human research is ongoing.

  • Omega-6 Imbalance: Many vegetable oils used in shortening are high in omega-6 fatty acids, which can contribute to a pro-inflammatory state when consumed excessively in relation to omega-3s.

  • Highly Processed: Modern shortening is a highly processed fat with limited nutritional value, and it's typically found in other processed foods high in sugar and refined carbs.

  • Better Alternatives: Healthier, less-processed fats like butter, lard, coconut oil, and extra-virgin olive oil are better choices for general cooking and baking.

  • Moderation is Key: While not as dangerous as its trans-fat predecessor, modern shortening is still a fat best used in moderation as part of a balanced diet, not as a staple.

In This Article

The History of Vegetable Shortening and its Inflammatory Past

Vegetable shortening, first introduced commercially by Procter & Gamble as Crisco in 1911, was initially marketed as a healthier alternative to animal fats like lard and butter. The key to its solid state and long shelf life was a process called partial hydrogenation, which converted liquid vegetable oils into a semi-solid fat. While this created a versatile and affordable cooking fat, it also created a dangerous byproduct: artificial trans fats.

The Health Crisis with Trans Fats

For decades, partially hydrogenated vegetable oil, loaded with trans fats, was a dietary staple in processed baked goods and fried foods. However, scientific research eventually revealed the devastating health consequences. Trans fats were shown to significantly increase LDL (“bad”) cholesterol while lowering HDL (“good”) cholesterol, a double blow to cardiovascular health. Furthermore, multiple studies linked higher trans fat intake to increased markers of chronic inflammation, which is a major risk factor for heart disease, diabetes, and stroke.

This mounting evidence led health organizations and government bodies to take action. The FDA banned partially hydrogenated oils in 2018, forcing manufacturers to reformulate their products.

The Shift to Modern Shortening: A New Set of Questions

To comply with the ban, shortening manufacturers turned to new processing methods. Most modern vegetable shortening is now made from fully hydrogenated vegetable oils and then blended with liquid vegetable oils, a process called interesterification. This technique rearranges the fatty acid structure to create a solid, spreadable fat without creating trans fats.

This change has seemingly eliminated the most dangerous component, but it has not made vegetable shortening a health food. The new formulation raises its own set of health questions.

Concerns Over Interesterified Fats

While interesterified fats are a relatively new technology, early research, primarily in animal studies, has raised red flags.

  • Animal Studies: Some studies on rats found that diets high in interesterified fats led to increased inflammation, enlargement of fat cells, and fatty liver disease. Another study noted impaired blood sugar control.
  • Human Research: A limited review of human studies has not yet shown significant negative effects, but the consensus is that more research is needed to fully understand the long-term impact on human health.

Omega-6 and Inflammation

Beyond interesterification, the source oils for vegetable shortening are often a blend of soybean, cottonseed, or corn oils, which are all rich in omega-6 fatty acids. While omega-6s are essential, the standard American diet is typically heavy on omega-6s and low on anti-inflammatory omega-3s. This imbalance can shift the body towards a pro-inflammatory state. Since shortening is a concentrated source of these oils, it can contribute to this dietary imbalance.

Comparison of Common Cooking Fats

Feature Modern Vegetable Shortening Butter Virgin Coconut Oil
Fat Content 100% fat ~80% fat, ~20% water 100% fat
Fat Profile Saturated, mono- and polyunsaturated. Often high in Omega-6 Primarily saturated fat Primarily saturated fat (medium-chain triglycerides)
Processing Highly processed (hydrogenation, interesterification) Minimally processed (churned cream) Can be minimally processed (virgin) or refined
Inflammatory Potential Unclear long-term effects of interesterified fats, high omega-6 concerns Considered a more natural fat; moderation advised due to saturated fat Contains medium-chain triglycerides, lower inflammatory risk
Flavor Neutral Rich, buttery flavor Distinctive coconut flavor (if virgin)

Healthier Alternatives to Vegetable Shortening

Given the uncertainties surrounding modern shortening, many health-conscious consumers and chefs opt for alternatives. The best choice depends on the application:

  • Baking: For rich flavor and tenderness, butter is an excellent choice. For flaky crusts, some bakers even prefer lard. Unrefined coconut oil is a solid, plant-based fat that works well in many recipes, though it imparts a distinct flavor.
  • Frying: For high-heat applications, stable oils like avocado oil or refined coconut oil are better options.
  • General Cooking: Extra-virgin olive oil is praised for its anti-inflammatory properties and overall health benefits for general-purpose sautéing and cooking.

Conclusion: Moderation is Key for Processed Fats

While modern vegetable shortening is now free of artificial trans fats due to FDA regulations, the health implications of its new formulation are not yet fully understood. Early animal studies on interesterified fats are concerning, and the high omega-6 content of its base oils can contribute to a pro-inflammatory dietary state. Shortening is also a nutritionally empty, calorie-dense product typically found in baked goods and fried foods that are already high in sugar and refined carbs—all of which promote inflammation. Ultimately, vegetable shortening is a highly processed fat best consumed in moderation as an occasional treat, not a dietary staple. For regular use, healthier, less-processed alternatives with more established health profiles are a better choice.

The Inflammatory Role of Processed Foods

It's important to remember that vegetable shortening rarely exists in a vacuum. It is a cornerstone ingredient in many processed and packaged foods, from cookies and crackers to fried fast food. These foods are often inherently inflammatory due to their high content of added sugars, refined carbohydrates, and unbalanced omega-6 fatty acids. Focusing on a whole-foods diet and limiting processed items is one of the most effective strategies for reducing inflammation, regardless of the type of shortening used.

Learn more about the risks of processed fats and oils from the National Institutes of Health.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, thanks to FDA regulations that banned partially hydrogenated oils, modern vegetable shortenings are free of artificial trans fats. Manufacturers now use a different process called interesterification.

Interesterification is a process that rearranges the fatty acid structure in oils, allowing them to remain solid or semi-solid at room temperature without creating trans fats. The long-term health effects are still being researched.

Shortening is prized for its ability to create a tender, flaky texture in baked goods like pie crusts and cookies. It is also favored for frying due to its high smoke point and neutral flavor.

Butter is often considered a more nutritious choice because it is less processed and contains vitamins, though it is high in saturated fat. Shortening is 100% fat and is highly processed, and while the jury is still out on modern versions, butter offers a more established health profile.

Yes, coconut oil can be a good substitute for shortening in many baking applications, especially those requiring a solid fat. Keep in mind that virgin coconut oil will add a coconut flavor.

Many vegetable oils used in shortening are high in omega-6 fatty acids. When the dietary ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 is too high, it can promote chronic inflammation in the body. Balancing this ratio is important for health.

No, it's not necessary to completely avoid it, especially if used infrequently. However, given its highly processed nature and the availability of healthier alternatives, it's wise to limit your intake and use it as an occasional treat.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.