Skip to content
Ntro

Nutrition: Is stevia safer than saccharin?

•
4 min read

Over one-third of adults in the U.S. report consuming low- and no-calorie sweeteners, making the choice between options like stevia and saccharin a common one. But with differing origins and regulatory histories, is stevia safer than saccharin, or are they both equally sound sugar alternatives?

Quick Summary

This article provides a comprehensive comparison of stevia and saccharin, examining their origins, regulatory statuses, health impacts, and effects on gut health. It clarifies that both are generally considered safe in moderation, but their different compositions and histories influence how they are perceived and used.

Key Points

  • Source & Safety: Stevia is a natural, plant-derived sweetener, while saccharin is an artificial, lab-made one. Both are considered safe for consumption by major health authorities like the FDA, but only purified stevia extracts (not the crude leaf) hold this status.

  • Regulatory History: Saccharin faced public concern due to a 1970s rat study linking it to cancer, but this link was later disproven in humans, and the warning label was removed.

  • Taste Profile: Stevia can have a lingering, sometimes bitter aftertaste, while saccharin is known for its metallic finish.

  • Gut Health Effects: Emerging research indicates both sweeteners may potentially disrupt the gut microbiome, with effects varying between individuals. Studies on this are ongoing.

  • Dietary Context is Key: The health impact of either sweetener depends more on overall dietary patterns than on the individual ingredient. The WHO recommends focusing on reducing overall sweetness rather than relying on substitutes.

  • Personalized Response: Genetic makeup and existing gut bacteria can influence how an individual responds to these sweeteners, making the impact highly personal.

In This Article

Understanding the Landscape of Sweeteners

In the ever-evolving world of health and nutrition, low- and no-calorie sweeteners have become a staple for many looking to reduce their sugar intake. This shift is motivated by concerns over obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular health. Stevia and saccharin are two of the most widely used alternatives, yet they differ significantly in their source, history, and effects on the body. While stevia is celebrated for its natural, plant-based origins, saccharin is one of the oldest artificial sweeteners on the market.

The Allure of Stevia

Stevia is a non-nutritive sweetener derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant. It is significantly sweeter than table sugar. Highly purified steviol glycoside extracts are considered Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) by the FDA in the U.S.. However, whole-leaf stevia and crude extracts are not approved. Research on stevia's potential health effects is ongoing, with some studies suggesting possible benefits for blood pressure and blood sugar, as well as antioxidant properties. Stevia has a distinct taste profile and can have an aftertaste, particularly at higher concentrations. Some users report gastrointestinal discomfort. Its effect on the gut microbiome is still being studied.

The History and Safety of Saccharin

Saccharin is an artificial, zero-calorie sweetener with a long history of use since its discovery in 1879. It is much sweeter than sugar. Saccharin faced controversy in the 1970s due to studies linking it to bladder cancer in rats, leading to a warning label that was later removed after further research determined the findings were not applicable to humans. Today, major health authorities like the FDA and WHO consider saccharin safe within Acceptable Daily Intake limits. Saccharin is known for a metallic aftertaste. Like other artificial sweeteners, research suggests saccharin may affect the gut microbiome and potentially influence glucose tolerance. Some long-term animal studies have indicated potential links to weight gain or impaired organ function, but these are not consistently confirmed in humans.

Stevia vs. Saccharin: A Side-by-Side Comparison

To better illustrate the differences and similarities, here is a comparison table:

Feature Stevia (Purified Extract) Saccharin (Artificial)
Source Natural, from the Stevia rebaudiana plant Artificial, synthesized in a lab
FDA Status Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) FDA-approved food additive
Sweetness 200–400 times sweeter than sugar 200–700 times sweeter than sugar
Taste Slower onset, licorice-like or bitter aftertaste at high levels Quick onset, often with a metallic or bitter aftertaste
Heat Stability Generally heat-stable, suitable for baking Heat-stable, suitable for baking
Long-Term Safety Considered generally safe, though research on long-term effects is ongoing Considered safe within ADI, long history of regulatory approval
Gut Health Mixed results; some studies show potential for microbiome impact, others find limited effect Some human and animal studies show potential for gut microbiota disruption and altered glucose tolerance
Metabolic Impact May help control blood sugar, though research is complex Generally does not affect blood sugar, but some studies link it to altered metabolic response

The Role of Individual Response and Overall Diet

Ultimately, deciding whether is stevia safer than saccharin is not a simple yes or no. For most healthy individuals, both are considered safe when consumed within recommended limits as part of a balanced diet. However, personal health conditions, gut microbiome composition, and taste preferences can all influence which sweetener is the better choice for you.

The debate highlights a growing area of nutritional science: the impact of sweeteners on the gut microbiome and metabolism. For some, the body's response to sweeteners can be highly personalized. The World Health Organization (WHO) has also advised against relying on non-sugar sweeteners for long-term weight control, recommending a focus on reducing overall sweetness in the diet and choosing whole, natural foods instead.

Conclusion

While stevia's plant-based origin offers a perceived advantage, both stevia and saccharin are considered safe within regulatory guidelines. Saccharin's past cancer concerns have been largely disproven in humans. Research on the impact of both on the gut microbiome is ongoing and appears to be individualized. The choice between them often comes down to personal taste and preference for a natural versus artificial option. Moderation is advised for either, and a focus on whole foods remains the cornerstone of a healthy diet.

Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

Both stevia and saccharin are zero-calorie and do not significantly impact blood sugar levels, making them suitable for people with diabetes. However, individual responses can vary, so it's best to monitor your own body's reaction and consult a healthcare provider.

No, extensive research has concluded that the link between saccharin and bladder cancer observed in high-dose rat studies is not relevant to humans. The warning label once required in the U.S. was removed in 2000.

While derived from the stevia plant, the products sold as sweeteners are typically highly purified extracts of steviol glycosides (like Reb A). The FDA only approves these purified extracts, not the whole leaf or crude extracts.

Recent studies suggest that both stevia and saccharin may alter the composition of the gut microbiome, but the findings are inconsistent and depend on factors like dosage and individual biology. More research is needed to fully understand the long-term effects.

Both can help reduce calorie intake when used to replace sugar. However, the long-term impact on weight and appetite control is debated, as some studies suggest complex metabolic responses to non-nutritive sweeteners. Relying on them for weight control is not a substitute for a balanced diet.

Side effects are generally minimal for both when consumed in moderation. Stevia may cause gastrointestinal issues in some sensitive individuals, especially if the product contains sugar alcohols. Saccharin is known for its metallic aftertaste.

In May 2023, the WHO recommended against using non-sugar sweeteners for weight control, citing that they do not offer long-term benefits for reducing body fat. The advice was based on observations that high intake was linked to potential long-term risks like type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, though other dietary factors could be at play.

References

  1. 1
    Q. Which is safer, saccharin or stevia?
  2. 2
    Is Stevia a Safe Sugar Substitute?
  3. 3
    Saccharine: What is it, Safety, and More
  4. 4
    Artificial sweeteners and other sugar substitutes
  5. 5
    Long-Term Saccharin Consumption and Increased Risk of Obesity, Diabetes, Hepatic Dysfunction, and Renal Impairment in Rats
  6. 6
    Stevia Is Sweet — But Is It Good for You?
  7. 7
    Natural Sweetener Stevia Makes a Gutsy Comeback
  8. 8
    Effects of stevia on glycemic and lipid profile of type 2 diabetic ...
  9. 9
    Artificial Sweeteners And Gut Bacteria: What's The Story?
  10. 10
    Facts About Sugar and Sugar Substitutes
  11. 11
    Stevia

Related Topics:

#gut health #food safety #artificial sweeteners #stevia #sugar substitutes #diet health #non-nutritive sweeteners #Saccharin

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.