Skip to content

Should you worry about aspartame? Understanding the facts behind the sweetener

3 min read

In July 2023, the World Health Organization's cancer agency, IARC, classified aspartame as 'possibly carcinogenic to humans'. This headline sparked alarm, but what does the science actually say? This article provides a comprehensive overview to help you decide if you should worry about aspartame and its place in your diet.

Quick Summary

The WHO's cancer agency labeled aspartame a 'possible carcinogen,' yet its food additive committee reaffirmed a safe daily intake level. Regulatory bodies worldwide, like the FDA, consider it safe within approved limits, emphasizing that dosage is key to risk assessment.

Key Points

  • IARC Classification: The WHO's cancer research agency (IARC) classified aspartame as a 'possible carcinogen' in 2023, a hazard assessment based on limited evidence.

  • Reaffirmed Safety (JECFA): At the same time, the WHO's food additive committee (JECFA) reaffirmed the acceptable daily intake (ADI), stating aspartame is safe at current consumption levels.

  • Regulatory Consensus: Major food safety agencies like the FDA and EFSA continue to support aspartame's safety for the general population when used within approved ADI levels.

  • Dosage is Key: The safety assessment is dose-dependent; the amount of aspartame needed to exceed the ADI is far greater than what a typical person consumes daily.

  • PKU Exception: Individuals with the rare genetic disorder phenylketonuria (PKU) must avoid aspartame, as their bodies cannot properly process one of its components, phenylalanine.

  • Uncertainties Remain: While the consensus points toward safety in moderation, some anecdotal reports and conflicting studies on neurobehavioral effects warrant continued research.

In This Article

What is Aspartame?

Aspartame is an artificial sweetener found in many food and beverage products globally. It is composed of two amino acids, aspartic acid and phenylalanine, along with a small amount of methanol. Being about 200 times sweeter than table sugar, only a minimal amount is needed, contributing very few calories. Common items containing aspartame include diet sodas, chewing gum, certain yogurts, and some medications.

The WHO's 2023 Aspartame Review: Two Separate Conclusions

Confusion arose in July 2023 when two different World Health Organization (WHO) bodies released findings on aspartame's safety. These distinct assessments focused on different aspects of risk.

The Role of IARC and JECFA

  • The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC evaluates the potential hazard of a substance – whether it can cause cancer under any conditions, without considering typical human exposure. In 2023, IARC placed aspartame in Group 2B ('possibly carcinogenic to humans') based on limited evidence. Other substances in this group include aloe vera extract.
  • The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA): JECFA assesses the actual risk from food additives, considering how much people are typically exposed to. JECFA reviewed the evidence and concluded that the link between aspartame and cancer is 'not convincing,' reaffirming the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 40 mg per kg of body weight, which is considered safe.

IARC vs. JECFA: A Comparison of Perspectives

Feature IARC Classification JECFA Risk Assessment
Purpose Identify potential hazard (can cause cancer). Assess actual risk at typical consumption levels.
Basis Strength of evidence from studies. All health impacts considering estimated exposure.
2023 Finding Group 2B: "Possibly carcinogenic to humans". Reaffirmed ADI (40 mg/kg), no convincing cancer link.
Significance Hazard identification; not dose-specific risk probability. Risk assessment setting safe consumption limits.

Potential Health Concerns Beyond Cancer

Beyond cancer concerns, other health effects associated with aspartame have been explored, though the evidence is often inconsistent.

Neurobehavioral Effects

  • Cognitive and Mood Changes: Some research, including studies on rodents and humans, has suggested possible links between high aspartame intake and issues like irritability, depression, or memory problems. However, other studies have found no significant effects, leading to conflicting results often attributed to variations in research methods.
  • Headaches: Aspartame has been theoretically linked to headaches, particularly in those prone to migraines, but consistent scientific evidence supporting this is limited.
  • Neurotoxicity: Aspartame breaks down into components that could potentially affect neurotransmitter levels in large amounts. While animal studies at high doses have shown potential effects, reviews generally find no consistent neurotoxic effects at typical human consumption levels.

Other Reported Issues

  • Phenylketonuria (PKU): Individuals with this rare genetic disorder cannot process phenylalanine, a component of aspartame, which can lead to serious health issues. Products containing aspartame must include a warning for them.
  • Weight Management: The WHO advises against using non-sugar sweeteners like aspartame for weight control, as long-term use is not linked to significant body fat reduction.
  • Gut Microbiome: Research is exploring a potential link between artificial sweeteners and changes in gut bacteria, but the long-term impact on human health requires further investigation.

Regulatory Consensus on Safety

Despite the controversy, leading health and food safety organizations globally maintain that aspartame is safe when consumed within established ADI limits.

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): The FDA considers aspartame extensively studied and has repeatedly confirmed its safety under approved conditions, setting an ADI of 50 mg/kg body weight.
  • European Food Safety Authority (EFSA): After a comprehensive review in 2013, EFSA also found aspartame and its breakdown products safe at current exposure levels, aligning with an ADI of 40 mg/kg body weight.
  • Health Canada: Following the 2023 WHO reports, Health Canada reaffirmed aspartame's safety at current use levels, consistent with JECFA's conclusions.

Conclusion: Navigating Aspartame's Mixed Signals

Deciding whether to worry about aspartame depends on individual health and risk perspective. Most international and national health bodies agree aspartame is safe within the ADI for the general population. IARC's classification highlights a potential hazard but is not a risk assessment at typical consumption levels, differing from the mandates of JECFA and the FDA.

Individuals with PKU must avoid aspartame for medical reasons. For others, the choice involves weighing potential benefits, like reduced sugar, against theoretical long-term risks not strongly supported by current evidence. Moderation in all dietary choices is prudent. Staying informed on ongoing research is key to making personal dietary decisions.

World Cancer Research Fund: Aspartame and Cancer

Frequently Asked Questions

The FDA's ADI for aspartame is 50 milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day. The JECFA and EFSA recommend a slightly lower ADI of 40 mg/kg. For a 150-pound (70 kg) adult, this is the equivalent of consuming about 9–14 cans of diet soda per day to reach the ADI.

The WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified aspartame as 'possibly carcinogenic to humans' (Group 2B) based on limited evidence. However, a separate WHO committee (JECFA) and other regulatory bodies, including the FDA, state that the evidence linking aspartame to cancer is not convincing and that it is safe within recommended daily limits.

While some individuals report sensitivity and headaches after consuming aspartame, scientific studies have shown mixed results and no consistent evidence to conclusively link aspartame to headaches in the general population.

The only group of people who must avoid aspartame are those with phenylketonuria (PKU), a rare genetic disorder. For this group, the phenylalanine in aspartame can be toxic. All foods containing aspartame carry a warning for phenylketonurics.

Some animal studies and research suggest a potential link between artificial sweeteners and altered gut bacteria. However, more studies on humans are needed to understand the long-term effects on the gut microbiome.

The World Health Organization has issued guidance advising against using non-sugar sweeteners like aspartame for weight control, as evidence suggests no long-term benefit in reducing body fat.

Yes, the approval process for aspartame was historically controversial in the US, with allegations of irregularities and industry influence. However, numerous reviews, including by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, concluded that the proper protocols were followed, and repeated safety assessments have since confirmed its safety.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.