Skip to content

Which has less mercury, mackerel or sardines? A definitive nutrition guide

5 min read

According to FDA data, sardines contain an average mercury concentration of just 0.013 ppm, significantly lower than many varieties of mackerel. Deciding which has less mercury, mackerel or sardines, depends heavily on the specific type of mackerel, but for consistently low levels, sardines are the definitive winner.

Quick Summary

Sardines consistently contain less mercury than most mackerel species due to their smaller size and position on the food chain. While some mackerel, like Atlantic, are low-mercury options, larger species like King mackerel should be limited. Both fish are excellent sources of nutrients like omega-3s, but mercury content varies greatly.

Key Points

  • Mercury Levels: Sardines contain consistently lower levels of mercury compared to most mackerel species, especially King mackerel.

  • Species Distinction: Mercury levels in mackerel vary greatly by species; Atlantic and Pacific chub are low-mercury ('Best Choice'), while King mackerel is very high ('Choices to Avoid').

  • Nutrient-Dense: Both sardines and low-mercury mackerel are excellent sources of omega-3 fatty acids, protein, and essential vitamins like B12 and D.

  • Bone Health: Canned sardines with bones offer a superior source of dietary calcium, making them a great dairy-free option for bone health.

  • Safest Choice: For a consistently safe, low-mercury seafood option for all populations, including pregnant women and children, sardines are the most reliable choice.

  • Consider Sustainability: Sardines are a highly sustainable seafood choice due to their short lifespan and position low on the marine food chain.

In This Article

Understanding Mercury in Seafood

Mercury is an element found naturally in the environment that can accumulate in streams, lakes, and oceans. In these aquatic systems, bacteria convert it into a highly toxic form called methylmercury. This methylmercury is absorbed by small organisms and, as larger fish consume smaller ones, the concentration of mercury increases exponentially up the food chain, a process known as bioaccumulation.

Because of this process, larger, older predatory fish like shark, swordfish, and King mackerel tend to have the highest mercury levels. In contrast, smaller, shorter-lived fish like sardines accumulate much less mercury over their lifespan. This fundamental difference in biology and feeding habits explains why mercury content can vary so dramatically between different fish species.

The Mercury Winner: Sardines

When asking which has less mercury, mackerel or sardines, the answer is consistently sardines. As a small, plankton-feeding fish at the bottom of the food chain, sardines accumulate very little mercury. The FDA categorizes sardines as a "Best Choice" for consumption, meaning it is safe to eat 2 to 3 servings a week, even for pregnant women and young children.

The Mackerel Dilemma: Species Matters

Unlike the clear picture for sardines, the mercury content in mackerel varies dramatically by species. This is the critical piece of information many people miss. Some species, like King mackerel, are large, predatory fish with a high mercury load, landing them on the FDA's "Choices to Avoid" list. Other species, however, are smaller and perfectly safe for regular consumption.

  • King Mackerel (Choices to Avoid): Found in the Gulf of Mexico, this large species has very high mercury levels and should be avoided, especially by vulnerable populations.
  • Atlantic Mackerel (Best Choice): Found in the North Atlantic, this smaller species has low mercury levels, placing it on the FDA's "Best Choice" list alongside sardines.
  • Spanish Mackerel (Good Choice): This variety, found in the South Atlantic, has moderate mercury levels and is on the "Good Choices" list, with consumption recommended only once per week.
  • Pacific Chub Mackerel (Best Choice): A smaller species with low mercury levels, also falling into the "Best Choice" category.

Nutritional Comparison: Beyond Mercury

While mercury is a key safety consideration, both sardines and mackerel are nutritional powerhouses packed with heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids, protein, and essential vitamins and minerals. The best choice for you may depend on your specific nutritional needs.

Nutrient (per 100g serving) Sardines (Cooked) Mackerel (Atlantic, Cooked)
Calories ~208 kcal ~205 kcal
Protein ~24.6 g ~19 g
Omega-3s (EPA + DHA) ~1.5 g ~2.0 g
Calcium ~382 mg ~15 mg
Vitamin D ~4.8 mcg ~9.0 mcg
Vitamin B12 ~8.9 mcg ~16.7 mcg
Selenium ~52.7 mcg ~44.1 mcg

The Health Benefits of Sardines

Sardines are a nutrient-dense food with a range of health benefits, in addition to being a low-mercury option. Their small size means that when canned, the bones are soft and edible, providing a rich source of calcium. A single 100g serving of cooked sardines provides around 38% of your daily recommended calcium intake. They are also exceptionally high in vitamin B12, important for red blood cell formation and neurological function.

Key nutritional highlights of sardines:

  • Heart Health: High levels of omega-3s reduce inflammation and support cardiovascular function.
  • Bone Density: Edible bones provide an excellent source of calcium and vitamin D, crucial for strong bones.
  • Brain Function: The omega-3 DHA is vital for cognitive function and brain health.

The Nutritional Profile of Mackerel

As with sardines, certain types of mackerel (like Atlantic and Pacific) are highly nutritious and offer unique benefits. Mackerel is typically fattier than sardines, which translates to a higher concentration of omega-3 fatty acids per serving. It is also one of the richest sources of vitamin B12, often containing more than sardines.

Key nutritional highlights of mackerel (low-mercury species):

  • Superior Omega-3s: Generally contains more omega-3 fatty acids per gram compared to sardines, which is excellent for heart and brain health.
  • Rich in Vitamin B12: A single serving can provide a significant portion of the daily recommended intake, essential for energy and nerve function.
  • Skin Health: The combination of omega-3s, selenium, and vitamins E and D supports skin health and reduces inflammation.

Choosing Between Sardines and Mackerel

When making your choice, safety and nutrition are both important considerations. Sardines are a consistently low-mercury fish, making them a safe choice for all populations, including pregnant and nursing women, as well as children. If you prefer mackerel, stick to the low-mercury species like Atlantic or Pacific chub, and limit consumption of Spanish mackerel.

For a variety of nutrients, rotating your intake of both low-mercury fish is an excellent strategy. Both are inexpensive, sustainable, and versatile options, available fresh, frozen, or canned. Just be mindful of added sodium in canned varieties and check for BPA-free packaging. For more information and official dietary guidelines, you can refer to the FDA's Advice about Eating Fish.

Conclusion

While both sardines and certain types of mackerel are healthy additions to a diet, sardines are the safer and more consistent low-mercury option. The key is to be mindful of the specific species of mackerel, with Atlantic and Pacific chub being excellent low-mercury choices, while King mackerel should be avoided. Incorporating a variety of these smaller, oily fish into your weekly meals provides a potent dose of omega-3s and other vital nutrients with minimal heavy metal risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are canned sardines high in sodium? Yes, some canned sardines can be high in sodium, especially if packed in brine or certain sauces. To minimize sodium intake, you can opt for sardines canned in olive oil or water and rinse them before eating.

Why do smaller fish like sardines have less mercury? Smaller fish like sardines are lower on the marine food chain and have shorter lifespans, so they accumulate much less methylmercury compared to larger, predatory fish like King mackerel or tuna.

Can pregnant women eat mackerel? Pregnant women are advised to eat low-mercury fish. While Atlantic and Pacific chub mackerel are considered "Best Choices," they should avoid King mackerel and limit Spanish mackerel. Sardines are also a safe, excellent option.

What are the key nutritional differences? While both are rich in protein and omega-3s, sardines offer a significant amount of calcium (if the bones are eaten) and slightly less omega-3 per serving. Mackerel typically has higher omega-3s and is an exceptional source of Vitamin B12.

Does cooking fish reduce mercury levels? No, cooking methods like grilling or baking do not significantly reduce mercury levels in fish. Mercury is bound to the fish's protein and will not be cooked out.

How many servings of low-mercury fish can I eat per week? The FDA and EPA recommend 2 to 3 servings (8-12 ounces) per week of "Best Choices" fish, which includes sardines, Atlantic mackerel, and Pacific chub mackerel.

Is the environmental impact of catching sardines and mackerel different? Sardines are considered one of the most sustainable seafood options due to their low position on the food chain, fast reproduction rate, and efficient harvest methods, which typically result in minimal bycatch.

Frequently Asked Questions

Some canned sardines can be high in sodium, especially those packed in brine. For a lower sodium option, choose sardines canned in olive oil or water and consider rinsing them before eating.

Sardines are small and have a shorter lifespan, placing them low on the food chain. This results in less time for methylmercury to accumulate in their systems through bioaccumulation, compared to larger, older predatory fish.

Pregnant women can safely eat low-mercury mackerel species, such as Atlantic and Pacific chub, which are categorized as 'Best Choices' by the FDA. However, they should avoid high-mercury King mackerel and limit Spanish mackerel.

While both offer protein and omega-3s, mackerel generally has a higher omega-3 concentration per gram and is an exceptionally rich source of Vitamin B12. Sardines are uniquely high in calcium if the edible bones are consumed.

No, cooking fish does not reduce its mercury content. The methylmercury is bound to the fish's protein and remains in the flesh regardless of the preparation method.

For low-mercury options like sardines, Atlantic mackerel, and Pacific chub mackerel, the FDA and EPA recommend eating 2 to 3 servings (8-12 ounces) per week.

Sardines are a highly sustainable seafood choice due to their rapid reproduction cycle and position low on the food chain, which typically results in a smaller environmental footprint.

There is no significant difference in mercury levels between fresh and canned sardines of the same species. Canned fish often undergoes processing that does not remove mercury.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.