Skip to content

Which is Better for You: Potatoes or Rutabaga?

4 min read

According to nutritional data, rutabagas have less than half the calories and carbohydrates of potatoes per cooked cup. When deciding which is better for you, potatoes or rutabaga, the choice depends heavily on your specific dietary goals, such as managing carb intake or maximizing certain nutrients.

Quick Summary

A comprehensive comparison of potatoes and rutabaga reveals key nutritional differences, including variations in calorie, carbohydrate, and vitamin content, highlighting which may be the better choice for certain diets. Both offer unique health benefits and can be prepared in similar ways.

Key Points

  • Low Carb Alternative: Rutabaga contains less than half the carbohydrates and calories of potatoes, making it a better option for low-carb diets.

  • Rich in Vitamin C: Rutabaga is an exceptional source of Vitamin C, surpassing the amount found in potatoes, which boosts the immune system and fights free radicals.

  • Excellent Source of Potassium: Potatoes are a superior source of potassium, a mineral critical for regulating blood pressure and fluid balance.

  • Digestive Health Benefits: The resistant starch in potatoes and high fiber content in rutabaga both promote healthy digestion by feeding beneficial gut bacteria.

  • Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Properties: Rutabaga contains glucosinolates with antioxidant properties, which may help reduce inflammation and lower the risk of certain cancers.

  • Culinary Versatility: Rutabaga can be a creamy, flavorful substitute for potatoes in dishes like mash or fries, while also being a great ingredient in soups and stews.

  • Micronutrient Density: While rutabaga is lower in calories, potatoes offer a more varied mineral profile, including higher levels of Vitamin B6, manganese, and phosphorus.

In This Article

Potatoes vs. Rutabaga: A Head-to-Head Nutritional Showdown

Root vegetables are a foundational part of many cuisines and diets, prized for their heartiness and nutritional value. Among the most popular are the familiar potato and its less common cousin, the rutabaga. While they may appear similar at a glance, their nutritional profiles and health benefits differ significantly. This detailed guide will explore which is better for you, potatoes or rutabaga, considering factors like macronutrients, vitamins, and minerals.

The Lowdown on Macronutrients

When it comes to the primary building blocks of food—carbohydrates, protein, and fat—there are clear differences between these two root vegetables. Those looking to reduce their carb or calorie intake will find one option more appealing.

  • Carbohydrates and Calories: One of the most significant distinctions is the carb and calorie count. A cooked cup of rutabaga contains approximately 66 calories and 12 grams of carbohydrates, making it a lower-carb alternative. In contrast, the same portion of cooked potato can contain over 130 calories and 31 grams of carbohydrates. This difference is particularly important for individuals following low-carb, keto, or weight-loss diets. The starchy nature of potatoes contributes to their higher glycemic index, causing a more rapid rise in blood sugar compared to rutabaga.
  • Fiber: Both vegetables provide dietary fiber, essential for digestive health. However, rutabaga is often cited as a higher-fiber option, especially when compared cup-for-cup. The fiber in rutabaga helps promote satiety, which can assist in weight management by making you feel fuller for longer. This insoluble fiber also feeds beneficial gut bacteria, supporting a healthy microbiome.
  • Protein and Fat: Both potatoes and rutabaga are naturally low in fat. Potatoes, however, contain a slightly higher amount of protein per serving. A raw russet potato offers 2.63g of protein per 100g, while rutabaga has 1.08g. For most, this difference is marginal and will be outweighed by the overall protein sources in their diet.

Vitamins and Minerals: A Nutrient Comparison

Digging deeper, the vitamin and mineral content of potatoes and rutabagas also vary, with each offering a unique set of benefits.

  • Potatoes: Potatoes are a powerhouse of essential nutrients, especially when eaten with the skin on. A medium baked potato is an excellent source of potassium, crucial for blood pressure regulation. They also contain a considerable amount of Vitamin B6, which supports metabolism and nervous system function, and Vitamin C, a powerful antioxidant. Potatoes are also rich in manganese, magnesium, and phosphorus.
  • Rutabaga: Rutabaga stands out for its high Vitamin C content, with one cup providing a significant portion of the daily recommended value. This supports immune function and acts as an antioxidant. Rutabagas are also a rich source of potassium, comparable to potatoes, and provide magnesium and calcium, which are important for bone health.

Comparison Table: Potatoes vs. Rutabaga (per cooked cup)

Nutrient Potato (approx. 136g boiled) Rutabaga (approx. 175g boiled) Key Differences
Calories ~136 kcal ~66 kcal Rutabaga has significantly fewer calories.
Carbohydrates ~31 g ~12 g Rutabaga is much lower in carbs, ideal for low-carb diets.
Fiber ~3 g ~4 g Rutabaga offers slightly more fiber per cooked cup.
Protein ~3 g ~2 g Potato has a slightly higher protein content.
Vitamin C ~34% DV ~50% DV Rutabaga is a better source of Vitamin C.
Potassium ~17% DV ~11% DV Potatoes offer more potassium per cup.
Vitamin B6 ~23% DV ~19% DV Potatoes are a richer source of Vitamin B6.

Health Benefits: Beyond the Numbers

Both vegetables offer health benefits that go beyond their basic nutritional facts. Potatoes contain resistant starch, particularly when cooked and cooled, which can improve blood sugar control and digestive health by feeding good gut bacteria. Rutabaga, as a cruciferous vegetable, contains powerful antioxidants like glucosinolates, which may have anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties.

Cooking and Culinary Uses

Both potatoes and rutabaga are incredibly versatile in the kitchen. Potatoes are famous for their mild, starchy flavor and texture, making them a blank canvas for various dishes, including mashing, roasting, and frying. Rutabaga has a sweeter, richer, and slightly peppery taste, reminiscent of a turnip and cabbage cross. This makes it an excellent, low-carb substitute for potatoes. You can mash them, roast them, or add them to stews and soups. For those new to rutabaga, a great strategy is to mix it with potatoes to achieve a familiar taste and texture while reducing the carb count, as is done in the classic Scottish dish, 'Neeps & Tatties'.

Conclusion: Which is the Winner?

Choosing between potatoes and rutabaga truly depends on your dietary priorities. If you are focused on weight loss, managing blood sugar levels, or simply reducing your carbohydrate intake, rutabaga is the clear winner due to its lower calories and carbs. It also provides a superior dose of Vitamin C and excellent fiber content. However, if you are looking for a nutrient-dense option that offers higher levels of potassium and Vitamin B6, the potato, especially with its skin, is a fantastic choice. The best approach for many is to incorporate both into their diet to enjoy the unique health benefits and culinary versatility each root vegetable offers.

Ultimately, both potatoes and rutabaga are nutritious additions to a balanced diet. The ideal choice is the one that best fits your individual health goals and culinary preferences. For more recipe inspiration and information, explore resources like the Idaho Potato Commission for potatoes or various food blogs for creative rutabaga recipes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Rutabaga is generally better for weight loss due to its significantly lower calorie and carbohydrate content per serving. Its high fiber also helps you feel full longer, which can prevent overeating.

Yes, rutabaga is highly suitable for a low-carb diet. With only 12 grams of carbohydrates per cooked cup, it serves as an excellent low-carb substitute for potatoes.

The potato has a broader and more nutrient-dense mineral profile, including higher levels of potassium and Vitamin B6. However, rutabaga provides a higher concentration of Vitamin C per serving.

Potatoes have a mild, starchy flavor, while rutabaga has a richer, slightly sweeter, and earthier taste with notes of cabbage and turnip.

Yes, rutabaga can be used in many recipes that call for potatoes, especially mashed or roasted dishes. However, it may require slightly longer cooking time due to its harder texture.

For most, rutabaga is safe. However, like other cruciferous vegetables, it contains goitrogens, which can affect thyroid function in those with pre-existing thyroid conditions, though this effect is often mitigated by cooking.

For potatoes, the skin contains a significant amount of the vitamins and minerals, and leaving it on increases the nutritional content. Rutabaga skin is generally thick and waxed, so it is recommended to peel it before eating.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.