Skip to content

Which is healthier, saccharin or stevia?

4 min read

While saccharin was embroiled in a 1970s health scare regarding cancer in rats, regulatory bodies have since deemed it safe for human consumption, yet public perception remains wary. This lingering uncertainty highlights the ongoing debate: which is healthier, saccharin or stevia, an artificially created compound or a naturally-derived plant extract?

Quick Summary

Saccharin is a synthetic, zero-calorie sweetener with a controversial past, while stevia is a plant-based, natural alternative. Both are FDA-approved as sugar substitutes, but they differ in origin, aftertaste, and potential long-term metabolic effects, with purified stevia often viewed more favorably.

Key Points

  • Origin: Saccharin is a synthetic, lab-created compound, while stevia is a natural, plant-based extract from the Stevia rebaudiana leaf.

  • Safety Profile: Both are deemed safe by the FDA. Saccharin's cancer link from rat studies was disproven for humans, while purified stevia extract holds a GRAS status.

  • Impact on Blood Sugar: Neither sweetener contains calories or carbs, and both have no significant impact on blood glucose or insulin levels, making them safe for diabetics.

  • Gut Microbiome Effects: Emerging research suggests both sweeteners may influence gut bacteria balance, potentially affecting metabolic health, though more human studies are needed.

  • Taste: Saccharin is known for a metallic aftertaste, whereas stevia can sometimes have a bitter or licorice-like finish at high concentrations.

  • Best for Baking: Stevia is heat-stable and suitable for baking, while saccharin is not due to its instability when heated.

In This Article

The Story of Saccharin

Discovered accidentally in 1879, saccharin is one of the oldest and most well-known artificial sweeteners. As a synthetic compound, it is derived from petroleum and is 300 to 400 times sweeter than sugar. It gained immense popularity during sugar shortages, especially during World War I. However, its reputation faced a major setback in the 1970s when animal studies linked very high doses of saccharin to bladder cancer in rats. This led to a mandatory warning label on products containing saccharin, which fueled public fear and pushed many manufacturers to seek alternatives.

By 2000, after extensive follow-up research revealed that the cancer risk seen in rats did not apply to humans, the warning label was removed. The mechanism that caused tumors in rats—a unique physiological response involving high urinary pH and calcium phosphate—is not relevant to human biology. Today, saccharin is approved for use by major health organizations, including the FDA. Despite this, some lingering concerns exist, particularly around its potential impact on the gut microbiome and subsequent effects on glucose tolerance, based on some emerging studies.

Potential Health Considerations for Saccharin:

  • Metallic Aftertaste: A notable drawback for many users is the bitter or metallic aftertaste, especially at high concentrations.
  • Gut Microbiome: Preliminary research, some involving mice and limited human studies, suggests saccharin may alter the balance of gut bacteria. Some researchers propose this could impact glucose tolerance and metabolism.
  • Metabolic Effects: As a non-nutritive sweetener, it does not contribute calories or carbohydrates. However, some observational studies have suggested a potential link between artificial sweetener consumption and weight gain or metabolic syndrome, though the causality is not yet clear.

The Story of Stevia

Stevia is a natural, plant-based sweetener derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant, native to South America. It has been used for centuries by indigenous peoples to sweeten foods and drinks. Unlike saccharin, stevia's sweetness comes from compounds called steviol glycosides. It is 200 to 300 times sweeter than sugar and is also calorie-free.

Stevia has gained significant traction in the health-conscious market due to its natural origin. However, it is crucial to differentiate between the highly purified stevia leaf extracts and the whole stevia leaf or crude extracts. The FDA has granted "Generally Recognized as Safe" (GRAS) status only to the high-purity extracts, such as Rebaudioside A (often sold as Truvia or PureVia). The whole leaf and crude extracts are not FDA-approved for use as a food additive due to insufficient toxicological data.

Potential Health Benefits and Considerations for Stevia:

  • Blood Sugar Management: Numerous studies confirm that stevia does not raise blood sugar or insulin levels, making it a safe sugar alternative for people with diabetes.
  • Weight Control: By providing a sweet taste without calories, stevia can help individuals manage their weight, especially when used to replace sugar in high-calorie foods and beverages.
  • Antioxidant Properties: Some research indicates that stevia contains antioxidant compounds that may offer additional health benefits, such as fighting oxidative stress.
  • Gut Microbiome: Like saccharin, research is ongoing into stevia's effects on gut microbiota. Some studies have shown changes, but overall evidence is less conclusive than with other artificial sweeteners, and more long-term research is needed.

Saccharin vs. Stevia: A Direct Comparison

To make an informed decision, here is a breakdown of the key differences between saccharin and stevia.

Feature Saccharin Stevia (Purified Extract)
Origin Synthetic (lab-created from petroleum) Natural (from Stevia rebaudiana plant leaf)
Calories Zero Zero
FDA Status Approved as a food additive GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) for high-purity extracts
Taste Often has a metallic or bitter aftertaste, especially at higher doses Has a slower onset of sweetness; some describe a licorice-like or bitter aftertaste at high concentrations
Heat Stability Not stable under heat and not suitable for baking Stable under heat and can be used in baking and cooking
Cancer Risk No proven link to human cancer; historical scare was based on rat studies No proven link to human cancer
Gut Health Preliminary evidence suggests it may alter gut microbiota Research is ongoing, some studies show changes to gut flora

Conclusion: Making the Healthier Choice

When considering which is healthier, saccharin or stevia, the answer depends on individual health goals, taste preferences, and willingness to accept a synthetic vs. a natural product. For many, stevia's plant-based origin and more recent health profile make it the more appealing choice. Its ability to be used in baking and its lack of association with long-disproven cancer scares also give it an edge in public perception. However, it is essential to remember that only the highly purified steviol glycoside extracts are approved by the FDA.

Saccharin, despite its contentious history, is still considered safe for human consumption by health authorities. While some studies point to potential negative long-term effects on the gut microbiome for both sweeteners, these findings are still largely preliminary and not fully understood in human populations. Ultimately, the healthiest approach is to reduce overall intake of sweet flavors, regardless of the source. Using either sweetener in moderation to reduce sugar consumption can be a positive step for many.

For more in-depth information about artificial sweeteners and their regulation, the National Cancer Institute provides a comprehensive fact sheet on artificial sweeteners and cancer.


Disclaimer: The information provided is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a healthcare provider before making significant dietary changes, especially if you have underlying health conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. While earlier studies on rats suggested a link to bladder cancer, further research determined this risk doesn't apply to humans. Major health authorities, including the FDA, consider saccharin safe within an acceptable daily intake.

Not necessarily. While stevia's plant origin is appealing, its 'natural' status doesn't automatically make it healthier. The FDA only approves highly purified stevia extract, and studies are still exploring its full long-term effects on the body, especially the gut microbiome.

Stevia is generally heat-stable and can be used in baking. Saccharin, however, is not stable when heated and is not recommended for baking as it can lose its sweetness and develop a bitter taste.

No. Both saccharin and stevia are non-nutritive, meaning they contain zero calories and do not impact blood glucose or insulin response in the way sugar does, making them safe for diabetics.

In the 1970s, studies linked high doses of saccharin to bladder cancer in male rats. This led to a mandatory warning label until 2000, when the FDA removed it after human studies found no clear link between saccharin consumption and cancer risk.

Stevia is generally well-tolerated. However, some individuals may experience mild side effects like bloating, nausea, or a bitter aftertaste, especially at high concentrations. The whole leaf extract is not FDA approved.

Taste preference is subjective. Saccharin can have a metallic aftertaste, while stevia can have a licorice-like or bitter taste at high concentrations. This is why they are often blended with other sweeteners to improve the flavor profile.

Yes, high-purity stevia leaf extracts are considered safe for people with diabetes. They do not contain calories or carbohydrates and do not affect blood glucose levels.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.