Skip to content

Why is vitamin C not on the nutrition label?

4 min read

In 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finalized updates to the Nutrition Facts label, removing the requirement to list vitamins A and C. This was a significant shift, prompting many to ask: why is vitamin C not on the nutrition label? The change reflects decades of improved public health and dietary habits that have made vitamin A and C deficiencies uncommon in the United States.

Quick Summary

The FDA removed the mandatory vitamin C listing from nutrition labels during its 2016 update, as widespread deficiencies are no longer a public health concern. The new focus is on more common deficiencies, like vitamin D and potassium, which are now required. Manufacturers can still voluntarily list vitamin C.

Key Points

  • FDA Regulation Change: In 2016, the FDA updated its labeling rules, making vitamins A and C optional rather than mandatory on the Nutrition Facts panel.

  • Rare Deficiencies: The primary reason for the change was that deficiencies of vitamin A and C are now rare in the general U.S. population, unlike in the 1990s.

  • Prioritizing Current Concerns: The new label prioritizes nutrients like Vitamin D and potassium, which are more commonly under-consumed and linked to current public health issues.

  • Manufacturer Flexibility: Food companies can still voluntarily include vitamin C on their labels, especially if the product is fortified or high in the nutrient.

  • Focus on Added Sugars: The updated label also introduced a separate line for "Added Sugars," reflecting a greater emphasis on reducing excess sugar intake.

  • Shift in Health Priorities: The label change mirrors a broader shift in public health, moving from combating deficiency diseases to addressing diet-related chronic illnesses.

In This Article

The Evolution of Nutrition Labeling

The story of why vitamin C is not on the nutrition label anymore begins with the evolution of public health and regulatory priorities. When the original Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) was passed in 1990, deficiencies in vitamins A and C were more prevalent among the U.S. population. The mandatory inclusion of these nutrients was a direct response to those public health needs, helping consumers make more informed choices to prevent deficiency-related diseases like scurvy.

Over the next few decades, dietary habits and access to a wide variety of nutritious foods improved considerably. By the time the FDA initiated its major label updates in 2016, deficiencies in vitamins A and C had become rare in the general population. This monumental update was designed to make the label more useful and relevant to modern consumer needs and health concerns, which have shifted from deficiency diseases to chronic illnesses like obesity and heart disease.

Shifting Public Health Focus

The FDA's decision was a strategic move to highlight nutrients of current public health concern. The updated label puts a greater emphasis on nutrients that are more likely to be under-consumed in the modern American diet, such as vitamin D and potassium, which are now mandatory listings. These nutrients play critical roles in bone health and blood pressure regulation, respectively. The updated label was streamlined to provide the most vital information, ensuring that consumers' attention is directed to the most relevant health metrics. This approach prevents information overload by removing data points that are no longer considered a priority for the vast majority of consumers.

Manufacturer's Choice: Voluntary Listing

It is important to remember that the removal of vitamin C from the mandatory list does not prohibit its inclusion. Manufacturers can still voluntarily list vitamin C if they choose to do so, especially if their product contains a significant amount of the vitamin and they want to use it as a marketing tool. If a product makes a specific claim about its vitamin C content, then the amount must be declared on the label. This voluntary declaration allows companies to highlight the nutritional benefits of their products when it's relevant, without cluttering the label on products that contain insignificant amounts of the nutrient.

Comparison of Old vs. New Nutrition Label Requirements

To understand the full scope of the change, it is helpful to see a side-by-side comparison of the old and new regulations concerning the Nutrition Facts label. The updated design and content reflect a more current scientific understanding of diet and its impact on health.

Feature Old Nutrition Facts Label (Pre-2020) New Nutrition Facts Label (Post-2020)
Mandatory Vitamins/Minerals Vitamin A, Vitamin C, Calcium, Iron Vitamin D, Calcium, Iron, Potassium
Voluntary Vitamins/Minerals Others (e.g., Vitamin D, Potassium) Vitamin A, Vitamin C, others
Vitamin and Mineral Units Only % Daily Value (%DV) was required. Both %DV and the actual amount (mg, mcg) are required for mandatory nutrients.
Added Sugars Not separately listed. Mandatory separate line item.
Calories from Fat Included. Removed, as the type of fat is considered more important than the total amount.
Serving Size Based on older data, often smaller than what people consume. Updated to reflect typical consumption habits.
Visual Design Smaller font sizes, less emphasis on calories. Larger, bolder fonts for calories and serving size.

Common Sources of Vitamin C

Despite not being required on most labels, vitamin C remains a vital nutrient. Many of the best food sources are commonly consumed raw, which helps preserve the heat-sensitive vitamin. Incorporating a variety of these foods into your diet can ensure you meet your daily requirements.

  • Citrus Fruits: Oranges, grapefruits, lemons, and limes.
  • Berries: Strawberries, blueberries, and raspberries.
  • Tropical Fruits: Kiwis, mangoes, and papayas.
  • Leafy Greens: Spinach and kale.
  • Cruciferous Vegetables: Broccoli, Brussels sprouts, and cauliflower.
  • Other Vegetables: Bell peppers, tomatoes, and potatoes.

Because many fruits and vegetables are consumed raw, the amount of vitamin C can vary between batches. The original labeling standards would have been incredibly difficult and expensive for manufacturers to accurately reflect these variations. This practical consideration further solidified the decision to make vitamin C a voluntary listing.

Understanding the New Label and Your Health

The updated nutrition label is a powerful tool designed to help you make healthier choices based on current nutritional science. The switch from highlighting rare deficiencies to focusing on prevalent modern health concerns is a logical and beneficial evolution of food regulation. The absence of vitamin C on the label is not a sign that it is unimportant; rather, it reflects that widespread deficiency is no longer a public health crisis in the U.S. By understanding these changes, consumers can better interpret the information provided and make conscious dietary decisions.

For more detailed information on the changes, you can explore the FDA's resources on the updated Nutrition Facts label.

Conclusion

In summary, vitamin C is no longer required on the nutrition label because widespread deficiencies are rare, and regulatory priorities have shifted to addressing more common nutritional concerns like insufficient vitamin D and potassium intake. The FDA's 2016 update streamlined the label, emphasizing nutrients of modern public health significance. This change allows for a more focused and effective label while still permitting manufacturers to voluntarily list vitamin C if desired. For the informed consumer, the shift simply means a greater focus on more prevalent health issues, while the availability of vitamin C from fresh fruits and vegetables remains abundant and accessible.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, it is not bad. The absence of vitamin C from the required list does not mean it is unimportant. It simply reflects a positive public health trend where widespread vitamin C deficiency is no longer a major concern in the U.S..

The FDA requires vitamins D and potassium to be listed because national surveys show many Americans do not get enough of these nutrients. Deficiencies in these are more of a public health concern today than vitamin C deficiency.

The FDA's final rule for the updated Nutrition Facts label was published in 2016. The majority of manufacturers were required to comply by January 1, 2020, with smaller businesses given an extra year.

Not necessarily. If a food contains vitamin C but the manufacturer has not fortified it or made a specific nutrient claim, they are not required to list it. Many natural foods contain vitamin C even if it is not on the label.

Yes. Manufacturers can voluntarily include vitamin C on the label, and they are required to do so if they make a specific nutrient content claim about it, such as "High in Vitamin C".

You can find reliable information on the vitamin C content of various foods from sources like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) databases.

Yes, along with vitamin C, vitamin A was also moved from the mandatory to the voluntary list of nutrients on the updated Nutrition Facts label, for the same reason that deficiencies are now rare.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.