Skip to content

Is eating bioengineered food bad? A science-based look at nutrition and safety

4 min read

Over 90% of corn, cotton, and soy grown in the United States are bioengineered varieties, meaning many common processed foods contain these ingredients. This prevalence naturally leads to the common question: Is eating bioengineered food bad?

Quick Summary

An examination of scientific evidence and expert consensus reveals bioengineered foods are considered safe and comparable to conventional counterparts. The article addresses potential health impacts, environmental considerations, and regulatory oversight to aid informed dietary decisions.

Key Points

  • Scientific Consensus: Major global health and regulatory bodies have concluded that approved bioengineered foods are as safe and nutritious as conventional ones.

  • Benefits vs. Risks: Bioengineered crops offer potential benefits like increased yields, higher nutrition, and reduced pesticide use, while concerns about allergies or long-term effects remain unproven by robust scientific evidence.

  • Labeling is Incomplete: The U.S. 'bioengineered' label has a narrow definition and includes exemptions for highly refined ingredients and animal products, meaning some GMO-derived foods may not be labeled.

  • Focus on Overall Diet: Most health professionals advise focusing on a balanced, nutrient-rich diet with plenty of fruits and vegetables, rather than disproportionately worrying about bioengineered content.

  • BE vs. Conventional/Organic: Bioengineered, conventional, and organic foods differ in their production methods, cost, and regulation, but all can be part of a healthy diet.

  • Not a New Category of Risk: According to reviews by the National Academies, the process of genetic engineering does not present new categories of risk compared to conventional methods, but specific traits can pose unique risks.

In This Article

The debate surrounding bioengineered (BE) food, also commonly known as genetically modified organisms or GMOs, is a complex topic that often evokes strong opinions. For consumers focused on a healthy nutrition diet, understanding the facts beyond the hype is crucial. This article dives into what bioengineered food is, the scientific consensus on its safety, its potential benefits and perceived risks, and the current state of labeling.

What is Bioengineered Food? Clarifying the Terms

The terms 'bioengineered' and 'genetically modified organism' are often used interchangeably, but there are important distinctions, especially concerning U.S. labeling. Bioengineering is a specific type of genetic modification achieved through laboratory techniques, such as inserting or modifying genes, that could not be created through traditional breeding. In contrast, the broader term GMO can technically include products from traditional selective breeding and hybridization, practices used for centuries.

The Difference Between BE and GMO

Under the U.S. National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard, certain products with detectable bioengineered material must be labeled as 'bioengineered'. However, exemptions exist for highly refined ingredients and products from animals fed BE feed, meaning some foods derived from GMOs may not carry the BE label. Third-party certifications like the Non-GMO Project use a broader definition than the federal standard.

How is Bioengineering Done?

Unlike traditional breeding which relies on crossbreeding selected plants, genetic engineering directly modifies specific genes to introduce beneficial traits like pest or drought resistance without undesirable characteristics. New technologies such as CRISPR are also utilized in this field.

The Scientific Consensus on Safety

Major scientific and regulatory organizations globally, including the WHO, FDA, and Health Canada, agree that approved bioengineered foods are safe and nutritionally comparable to non-BE foods. These foods undergo rigorous testing and regulatory oversight. Studies have found no link between BE food consumption and increased chronic diseases, allergies, or cancers. Animal studies also support the safety of consuming genetically engineered crops.

Potential Benefits of Bioengineered Crops

Bioengineering offers several potential benefits for agriculture and public health:

  • Increased Crop Yields: Enhancing productivity to help feed a growing population.
  • Reduced Pesticide Use: Crops engineered for pest resistance can decrease the need for chemical pesticides.
  • Enhanced Nutritional Value: Improving the nutrient content of crops, such as Golden Rice with added beta-carotene.
  • Disease and Drought Resistance: Creating crops more resilient to environmental challenges.
  • Economic Stability: Providing more reliable harvests for farmers.
  • Lower Costs for Consumers: Increased efficiency can lead to reduced food prices.

Common Concerns and Criticisms

Public concerns about bioengineered foods persist, although many lack scientific backing. Common issues raised include:

  • Allergic Reactions: While a concern, strict testing aims to prevent new allergens, and no allergic effects have been reported from current BE foods.
  • Antibiotic Resistance: Early methods using antibiotic resistance genes as markers have raised concerns, but regulatory guidance now discourages this practice.
  • Unintended Effects: Worries about unforeseen changes in plant composition are addressed through regulatory assessments comparing BE and conventional crops. Both methods can cause unintended changes, evaluated using the concept of 'substantial equivalence'.
  • Reliability of Studies: Some studies claiming harm have been criticized for poor methodology. It's crucial to rely on the extensive body of peer-reviewed research rather than isolated or flawed studies.

Bioengineered Food vs. Conventional and Organic

This table compares key aspects of BE, conventional, and organic foods:

Feature Bioengineered Foods Conventional Foods Organic Foods
Safety Rigorously tested and deemed safe by major bodies. Considered safe based on historical use and general regulation. Organic standards prohibit genetic engineering; safety is based on farming practices.
Environmental Impact Can reduce pesticide use and promote sustainable farming. May involve synthetic chemical use. Focuses on sustainable practices and prohibits synthetics.
Cost Often lower due to efficiency. Variable. Generally higher due to practices and certification.
Regulation Heavily regulated, specifically focusing on genetic modification. Regulated, with different standards than BE foods. Strict federal standards for farming and processing.

The Reality of Bioengineered Food Labeling

The U.S. National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard requires labeling for certain foods with detectable BE DNA. Options include text, a symbol, or a QR code. However, exemptions mean not all foods derived from GMOs are labeled. Consumers wishing to avoid all GMOs should look for third-party certifications like USDA Organic or Non-GMO Project Verified.

Making an Informed Decision for Your Diet

Choosing whether to consume bioengineered foods involves considering scientific evidence, personal values, and dietary goals. While concerns exist, the scientific consensus supports the safety of approved BE foods. Health professionals often advise prioritizing a balanced diet rich in whole foods over focusing solely on GMO content. Informed decisions rely on understanding the facts and interpreting labeling accurately.

Conclusion

While concerns about bioengineered food persist, scientific bodies agree that approved BE foods are safe and comparable to conventional options. Potential benefits include increased yields, improved nutrition, and reduced pesticide use, contributing to global food security. Addressing public concerns requires ongoing research and open dialogue. Consumers can make informed choices by prioritizing a balanced diet and staying knowledgeable about food technology and regulations. Additional resources can be found at The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Frequently Asked Questions

Studies comparing bioengineered foods to their non-bioengineered counterparts generally find no significant nutritional differences. In some cases, genetic modification is specifically designed to enhance the nutritional profile, such as increasing vitamin or mineral content.

Leading health and scientific organizations report that bioengineered foods currently on the market are no more likely to cause allergic reactions than non-bioengineered foods. Developers of BE foods are required to test for potential allergens.

While it is impossible to prove a negative definitively, extensive research and decades of consumption history have not revealed any unique long-term health effects from approved BE foods. Long-term population studies have compared health trends between regions with high and low BE food consumption, finding no differences.

In the U.S., the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard has exemptions. Most notably, highly refined ingredients (like corn oil or sugar) and products derived from animals that have consumed BE feed are not required to be labeled because the modified genetic material is no longer detectable.

According to the American Cancer Society and other health organizations, there is no validated evidence to suggest a link between eating bioengineered foods and an increased or decreased risk of cancer. Concerns raised by smaller, often-flawed studies have not been substantiated by the wider scientific community.

The most reliable way to avoid genetically engineered foods is to look for products with USDA Organic certification, which prohibits the use of GMOs. You can also look for the Non-GMO Project Verified label, which uses a broader definition than the federal bioengineered standard.

No, while often used interchangeably, the terms are not identical. 'Bioengineered' is the specific legal term defined by the USDA for U.S. labeling, and it is narrower in scope. 'GMO' is a more general term that can encompass a broader range of genetically modified products and techniques.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.