Skip to content

Which Has More Fiber, Sweet Potato or Russet Potato? A Nutritional Breakdown

4 min read

According to the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, most Americans consume only about half of the recommended daily fiber intake, making every fiber-rich food choice count. When comparing staple starches, many wonder, which has more fiber, sweet potato or russet potato?

Quick Summary

This article explores the fiber content of sweet potatoes versus russet potatoes, detailing the nutritional profiles, impact of preparation, and benefits of including both tubers in a healthy diet. It also examines the role of potato skins and resistant starch in maximizing fiber intake for better gut health.

Key Points

  • Sweet Potatoes Are Higher in Fiber: When comparing baked potatoes of the same weight, a sweet potato generally contains more fiber than a russet potato.

  • The Skin Is Crucial: Most of the dietary fiber in both potato varieties is concentrated in the skin, so eating the peel is key to maximizing fiber intake.

  • Resistant Starch in Russets: Russet potatoes contain resistant starch, which increases when cooked and cooled, offering prebiotic and gut-health benefits similar to fiber.

  • More Than Just Fiber: Sweet potatoes are nutritional powerhouses for Vitamin A, while russets are an excellent source of potassium and Vitamin B6.

  • Cooking Method Matters: The way a potato is cooked can affect its fiber content and glycemic impact; boiling sweet potatoes can keep their GI lower than baking them.

  • Enjoy Both for Variety: Incorporating both sweet and russet potatoes into your diet ensures a wider range of nutrients and health benefits.

In This Article

Sweet Potato vs. Russet Potato: The Fiber Face-Off

When it comes to dietary fiber, the difference between a sweet potato and a russet potato depends largely on how it is prepared. While sweet potatoes generally edge out russets in fiber content, particularly when baked, both are valuable sources of this essential nutrient. A key factor is whether the skin is included, as a significant portion of fiber is found there.

Raw vs. Cooked Fiber Content

For an equivalent 100-gram serving, a baked sweet potato often contains more than double the fiber of a baked russet potato. For instance, one source shows a baked sweet potato with 3.3 grams of fiber per 100g compared to a baked white potato's 2.1 grams. Another reference highlights that sweet potatoes take the lead in the fiber department, promoting digestive health. However, this is not the whole story, as cooking method and whether the skin is consumed can significantly alter the outcome.

The Power of the Peel: Keeping the Skin On

For both sweet and russet potatoes, the skin is where a significant concentration of dietary fiber and other antioxidants are found. Eating the skin of a baked russet can boost its fiber content substantially. A study found that cooked potatoes without the skin have less fiber than those cooked with the skin still on. Therefore, to maximize the fiber intake from either vegetable, one should always scrub the skin well and leave it on during cooking.

Maximizing Fiber with Resistant Starch

An interesting aspect of potato nutrition is resistant starch, which is found in both varieties. This type of starch resists digestion in the small intestine and acts like a form of soluble fiber in the large intestine. Russet potatoes are notable for their resistant starch content, especially when cooked and then cooled. This cooling process, known as retrogradation, increases the amount of resistant starch, providing prebiotic benefits that feed good gut bacteria and improve digestive health. This makes a cold potato salad or reheated baked potato an excellent way to boost your fiber intake, even if the sweet potato initially has a higher count.

More Than Just Fiber: Other Nutritional Differences

Beyond fiber, sweet potatoes and russet potatoes offer unique nutritional benefits. They are not botanically related and have distinct vitamin and mineral profiles.

Sweet Potatoes:

  • Exceptionally high in Vitamin A, containing large amounts of beta-carotene, which is an antioxidant that supports eye health and the immune system.
  • Good source of Vitamin C and manganese.
  • Typically have a lower glycemic index than russet potatoes, especially when boiled, due to their higher fiber content.

Russet Potatoes:

  • Excellent source of potassium, containing more than sweet potatoes.
  • Higher in certain B vitamins, including B6 and folate.
  • Contain antioxidant compounds called glycoalkaloids.

Comparison Table: Sweet Potato vs. Russet Potato (per 100g, baked with skin)

Nutrient Sweet Potato Russet Potato
Fiber Approx. 3.3g Approx. 2.1g
Vitamin A Approx. 107% DV Approx. 0.1% DV
Potassium Lower than Russet Higher than Sweet
Vitamin B6 Good Source Good Source
Vitamin C Good Source Good Source
Resistant Starch Less than Russet when cooled More than Sweet when cooled

How to Incorporate Both into a Healthy Diet

Instead of viewing this as an 'either/or' choice, a well-rounded diet benefits from incorporating both sweet and russet potatoes. Each offers distinct nutritional advantages that complement the other. Here are a few strategies:

  • Vary your cooking methods: Try boiling sweet potatoes to lower their glycemic index, and bake or roast russets for a hearty side. Consider making a cooled potato salad for a resistant starch boost.
  • Embrace the skin: Always leave the skin on for maximum fiber and nutrient retention. A simple scrubbing is all that's needed.
  • Mix and match: Create dishes that combine both potatoes, such as a colorful roasted medley with spices like rosemary and thyme, to benefit from their combined nutritional profiles.
  • Mind your toppings: To preserve their health benefits, avoid heavy, high-calorie toppings like excessive butter, sour cream, or cheese. Opt for healthier alternatives like herbs, spices, Greek yogurt, or a drizzle of olive oil.

Conclusion: Which Spud is the Fiber Champion?

In the battle of the spuds, sweet potatoes typically hold a slight edge in total fiber content, especially when baked. However, the difference is not so significant that it makes one universally superior to the other. Russet potatoes, particularly when cooled, provide a powerful boost of resistant starch that functions similarly to fiber, benefiting gut health. Both offer unique and valuable nutritional contributions, with sweet potatoes providing a massive dose of Vitamin A and russets offering more potassium. Ultimately, the healthiest approach is to include both types of potatoes in your diet, prepared in ways that maximize their nutritional value, such as keeping the skin on. Your meals and your body will be better for it.

For more information on the health benefits of different types of potatoes, you can visit Healthline's detailed comparison.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, a significant amount of dietary fiber in both sweet potatoes and russet potatoes is located in the skin. Keeping the skin on during cooking and consumption is an excellent way to increase your fiber intake.

Sweet potatoes generally have a lower glycemic index than russet potatoes, especially when boiled. The resistant starch in cooled russet potatoes can also help, but sweet potatoes often have a more favorable impact on blood sugar levels.

Resistant starch is a type of carbohydrate that behaves like soluble fiber in the body, resisting digestion and providing prebiotic benefits for gut health. Cooking and then cooling russet potatoes increases their resistant starch content.

To maximize fiber, always scrub and eat the skin. For russet potatoes, a good method is to cook them and then cool them before eating, as this increases their resistant starch.

Sweet potatoes are significantly higher in Vitamin A and also contain good amounts of Vitamin C. Russet potatoes are higher in potassium and offer a greater amount of Vitamin B6 and folate.

Yes, absolutely. Both potato varieties are highly nutritious and can be part of a balanced diet. Varying your intake allows you to benefit from the different nutrients each one provides.

No, they are from different plant families. Sweet potatoes are from the morning glory family, while russet potatoes are from the nightshade family.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.