Skip to content

Which is Healthier, Stevia or Saccharin? An In-Depth Look

4 min read

In a 2016 study, saccharin was linked to blood glucose spikes while stevia showed no notable effect on blood glucose levels. This highlights a key difference when considering which is healthier, stevia or saccharin, and points to the complex factors involved in choosing between these zero-calorie sweeteners for daily use.

Quick Summary

This analysis compares stevia and saccharin, covering their origins, safety profiles, metabolic effects, and impact on gut health. It helps consumers understand which zero-calorie sweetener is the better option for their specific needs, weighing natural vs. artificial origins.

Key Points

  • Origin: Stevia is naturally derived from a plant, while saccharin is a synthetic, man-made chemical.

  • Safety Profile: Purified stevia extract is generally recognized as safe (GRAS), whereas saccharin was historically linked to cancer in rats but is now considered safe for human consumption.

  • Blood Glucose Impact: Stevia has little to no impact on blood glucose, making it ideal for diabetics, while some studies show saccharin may cause blood glucose spikes.

  • Gut Health: Preliminary studies suggest saccharin may negatively alter gut bacteria, whereas the effects of stevia on gut flora are less clear and potentially less concerning.

  • Taste: Saccharin is known for a metallic aftertaste, which is often masked by combining it with other sweeteners, while stevia can have a licorice-like or bitter note.

  • Best Choice: Stevia is generally seen as the healthier option due to its natural origin and better-supported safety profile, but moderation is recommended for all sweeteners.

In This Article

Understanding the Sweeteners: Stevia and Saccharin

To determine which is the healthier choice, it's crucial to understand what each sweetener is and how it is produced. While both are zero-calorie options, their origins and processing differ significantly.

What is Stevia?

Stevia is a natural, non-caloric sweetener derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant, native to South America. Its sweetness comes from compounds called steviol glycosides, which are up to 400 times sweeter than regular sugar.

  • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has given 'Generally Recognized As Safe' (GRAS) status to highly purified steviol glycoside extracts (≥95% purity).
  • Products like Truvia and PureVia contain these extracts, though they may also include fillers.
  • However, whole-leaf stevia and crude extracts are not FDA-approved for use in food due to a lack of sufficient research.
  • Stevia is often perceived as more natural, but it still undergoes significant processing to be refined into the white powder commonly sold in stores.

What is Saccharin?

Saccharin is one of the oldest artificial sweeteners on the market, first discovered in 1879. It is a synthetic compound made in a laboratory through the oxidation of o-toluene sulfonamide or phthalic anhydride.

  • Like stevia, saccharin is a zero-calorie sweetener that is 300 to 500 times sweeter than sugar.
  • It is known for having a slightly bitter or metallic aftertaste, which is why it is often combined with other sweeteners in food products.
  • Saccharin is commonly found in the pink packets of tabletop sweetener and various diet foods and drinks.

Health Implications: A Head-to-Head Comparison

Comparing the health aspects of stevia and saccharin reveals different concerns and potential benefits, with ongoing research continuing to shape our understanding.

Safety and Carcinogenicity

Saccharin has a controversial past concerning cancer. Studies in the 1970s linked high doses of saccharin to bladder cancer in rats, leading to warning labels on products. However, extensive follow-up research found that the mechanism causing cancer in rats does not apply to humans, and the warning label was removed in 2000. Reputable health organizations like the FDA and WHO now consider saccharin safe for human consumption. For stevia, highly purified extracts are classified as safe, and studies have shown no link to cancer in humans. In fact, some lab studies even suggest potential anti-cancer properties, though more human research is needed.

Effects on Blood Sugar and Weight

Both sweeteners are popular among people managing blood sugar or weight, as they provide sweetness without calories. Studies indicate that high-purity stevia has a minimal to non-existent impact on blood glucose and insulin levels, making it a safe choice for those with diabetes. In contrast, some research suggests that saccharin can cause significant spikes in blood glucose, potentially due to its effect on gut bacteria. While intended for weight management, the effect of both sweeteners on weight loss is mixed in studies, with some suggesting they may paradoxically increase appetite or cause cravings for sweet foods.

Impact on Gut Health

Emerging research focuses on how non-nutritive sweeteners affect the gut microbiome. Preliminary studies suggest that saccharin may disrupt the balance of gut bacteria, potentially leading to glucose intolerance. Similarly, research on stevia and gut bacteria has produced mixed results, with some studies indicating a possible disruption, although recent reviews suggest it is less likely to cause harm over shorter periods.

Stevia vs. Saccharin: Comparison Table

Feature Stevia (Purified Extracts) Saccharin
Origin Natural, from the Stevia rebaudiana plant Artificial, synthetically produced
Caloric Value Zero calories Zero calories
Sweetness 200–400 times sweeter than sugar 300–500 times sweeter than sugar
Aftertaste Can have a licorice-like or bitter aftertaste, but modern processing reduces this Can have a bitter or metallic aftertaste
Safety Status (FDA) GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) for high-purity extracts Approved food additive; past cancer concerns in rats deemed not relevant to humans
Blood Sugar Impact Minimal to no effect, may help manage blood sugar Some studies suggest potential for blood glucose spikes
Gut Health Impact Research is mixed, but recent studies suggest low risk for disruption Preliminary evidence suggests potential disruption of gut bacteria

Other Considerations: Taste and Processing

Beyond health, taste is a major differentiator. Stevia can sometimes have a distinctive, lingering aftertaste that some find unpleasant, although manufacturers have worked to improve this. Saccharin is well-known for its metallic aftertaste, which is why it is often blended with other sweeteners. In terms of processing, saccharin is a purely synthetic creation. While stevia originates from a plant, the purified extract required for FDA approval undergoes extensive industrial processing, making the 'natural' label somewhat misleading for some commercial products.

Conclusion: Which is the Healthier Choice?

Based on current scientific evidence, stevia appears to be the healthier choice between the two. Its natural origin, clear FDA safety status for purified extracts, and minimal impact on blood glucose levels generally place it ahead of saccharin in a health comparison. While saccharin is considered safe by health authorities, its controversial history, potential effects on gut health, and reported blood glucose spikes in some studies raise more questions. For individuals concerned with blood sugar control, like those with diabetes, stevia seems to offer a more reliable option. Ultimately, the healthiest approach is to reduce overall intake of added sweeteners, both natural and artificial, and focus on naturally sweet whole foods like fruits. For those who do choose to use sweeteners, moderation is key, and personal taste and tolerance should also be taken into account. Consult a healthcare provider or dietitian if you have specific health concerns. Learn more about different sweetener options from the Mayo Clinic guide: Artificial sweeteners and other sugar substitutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, current research suggests that highly purified stevia extracts are safer. While saccharin's historical cancer link in rats was deemed irrelevant to humans, ongoing concerns about its impact on gut health and blood sugar make stevia the preferable option for most.

Yes, both are zero-calorie and can be used by people with diabetes. However, studies show that stevia has a more stable effect on blood glucose levels, whereas some research indicates saccharin might cause blood sugar spikes.

No. Despite early rat studies linking saccharin to bladder cancer, further research concluded the effect was not relevant to humans, and the substance was delisted as a carcinogen. Purified stevia extracts have shown no evidence of causing cancer.

Taste preference is subjective. Stevia can have a lingering, slightly bitter or licorice-like aftertaste, while saccharin is often described as having a metallic finish. Many products combine sweeteners to improve the taste profile.

Emerging research suggests that saccharin may disrupt the balance of beneficial gut bacteria. Studies on stevia's effect on gut health are mixed, but it appears to be less disruptive than saccharin.

The 'natural' label for stevia can be misleading, as the commercial products undergo significant processing. However, the key health differences, such as stevia's more stable effect on blood glucose and better safety track record, make it generally a better choice.

When consumed in moderation within FDA guidelines, serious side effects are rare. Some people may experience mild gastrointestinal issues like bloating or gas from stevia products containing sugar alcohols. For saccharin, the aftertaste can be a side effect.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.