Skip to content

Are scallops high in microplastics? A comprehensive look

4 min read

According to recent studies, filter-feeding bivalves, including scallops, accumulate microplastics at levels three to five times higher than many other marine animals. The critical question for consumers is: are scallops high in microplastics, and what does this mean for seafood safety?

Quick Summary

Scallops are susceptible to microplastic accumulation due to their filter-feeding biology, concentrating particles in organs that are consumed whole. Research indicates bivalves often contain higher levels of microplastics compared to finfish, with concentrations influenced by location and farming practices.

Key Points

  • Filter-Feeding Nature: Scallops, as filter-feeders, ingest microplastics directly from the water, leading to bioaccumulation.

  • Eaten Whole: Unlike gutted finfish, scallops are typically consumed whole, including the digestive organs where microplastics accumulate most heavily.

  • Location Matters: The microplastic load in scallops varies significantly depending on the harvesting location's pollution levels.

  • Potential Contaminant Carrier: Beyond the plastic particles themselves, microplastics can transport harmful chemicals and environmental toxins.

  • Reduce Exposure: Consumers can minimize risk by diversifying their diet, rinsing seafood, and supporting larger initiatives to reduce plastic pollution.

  • Health Implications: While research is ongoing, potential health risks include inflammation, altered gut microbiota, and exposure to toxic chemical additives.

  • Broader Solutions: The most effective long-term solution is addressing the source of plastic pollution through policy and sustainable practices.

In This Article

The Filter-Feeding Mechanism and Scallop Biology

Scallops are bivalve mollusks that feed by filtering large volumes of water, trapping tiny food particles like phytoplankton. Unfortunately, this non-selective feeding process also makes them highly efficient at ingesting microscopic plastic particles that are widespread in marine ecosystems. These particles, defined as smaller than 5 mm, are found throughout the water column and sediments where scallops live. Once ingested, microplastics are not simply passed through the animal. Studies confirm that plastic particles rapidly move and disperse throughout the scallop's body, accumulating in key organs. Research by the University of Plymouth showed that nanoplastics, the smallest type of microplastic, traveled to a scallop's kidneys, gills, and muscles within just six hours. The edible portion of the scallop—the adductor muscle—can contain these particles, though the digestive gland and gills are the primary accumulation sites. Because scallops are typically eaten whole, excluding only the shell, the consumer is exposed to the entire microplastic load accumulated in the organism's body.

Microplastic Load: Scallops vs. Other Seafood

A key differentiator in comparing microplastic risk across seafood is the consumption method. For larger fish, the gastrointestinal tract is usually removed before eating, which is where the majority of microplastics are concentrated. Bivalves like scallops, however, are consumed in their entirety, gut and all, leading to a higher direct intake for the consumer.

Comparison of Microplastic Levels in Seafood

Seafood Type Ingestion Method Microplastic Accumulation Human Exposure
Scallops Filter-feeder; consumed whole High (concentrated in gills/digestive glands) High (ingest entire organism)
Mussels/Oysters Filter-feeder; consumed whole High (similar to scallops) High (ingest entire organism)
Finfish Predatory/foraging; gutted before eating Variable (concentrated in digestive tract) Reduced (digestive tract removed)
Crustaceans Foraging; shelled before eating Variable (concentrated in digestive tract) Reduced (digestive tract removed)

Location and Farming Impact

The concentration of microplastics in scallops can vary dramatically based on where they are sourced. Research comparing microplastic levels in bivalves from different global locations found higher concentrations in regions with more plastic pollution, such as certain coastal areas of Asia. The water quality of a specific harvesting or farming site is a major factor, as filter-feeders reflect their immediate aquatic environment. Surprisingly, some studies have found higher levels of microplastics in farmed shellfish compared to their wild counterparts, suggesting that aquaculture practices can introduce additional contaminants. Conversely, other studies have shown higher levels in wild mussels than farmed ones, indicating that the source and specific practices matter significantly.

The Potential Health Implications

The consumption of microplastics raises several health concerns, although the full extent of the impact on human health is still an emerging area of study. The microplastic particles themselves can cause physical damage, but of equal concern is their ability to act as vectors for harmful chemicals and pathogens.

Potential Issues with Microplastic Ingestion:

  • Chemical Leaching: Microplastics can leach plasticizers and other chemical additives used during their manufacturing process, such as Bisphenol A (BPA), which is a known endocrine disruptor.
  • Absorbed Contaminants: They can absorb environmental pollutants from the water, including heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants (POPs), which are then transferred into the animal's tissues and potentially to the human consumer.
  • Gut Microbiota Disruption: Animal studies have shown that microplastics can disrupt the balance of gut bacteria, potentially leading to inflammation.
  • Cellular and Tissue Accumulation: The smallest particles, nanoplastics, can penetrate cellular membranes and accumulate in various tissues throughout the body, including the liver and even the brain, potentially triggering oxidative stress and inflammatory responses.

Taking Steps to Minimize Risk

While completely eliminating microplastic exposure from seafood is unrealistic due to the ubiquity of plastic pollution, consumers can take informed steps to reduce their risk. This involves both personal consumption habits and supporting broader environmental change.

Individual Actions:

  1. Diversify your diet: Reduce reliance on a single type of seafood, especially filter-feeding shellfish like scallops, mussels, and oysters. Incorporate a wider variety of protein sources, both seafood and plant-based, to distribute potential exposure.
  2. Rinse seafood thoroughly: While not a complete solution, rinsing seafood before cooking can help remove any surface-level microplastics.
  3. Choose high-fiber foods: Some evidence suggests a high-fiber diet may help trap and eliminate microplastics from the digestive system.
  4. Support sustainable practices: Purchase seafood from fisheries and suppliers known for responsible and clean environmental practices. While more studies are needed, sourcing can be a factor.

Broader Solutions:

Ultimately, addressing the root cause of microplastic pollution is the most effective solution. This requires a concerted effort from individuals, industry, and government, focusing on:

  • Reducing reliance on single-use plastics.
  • Supporting legislation to regulate plastic production and waste.
  • Improving wastewater filtration to capture microfibers from laundry.
  • Innovating with biodegradable and non-toxic alternatives.

The scale of the problem is enormous, but collective action can significantly reduce the amount of plastic entering our oceans and, consequently, our food chain.

Conclusion

The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that yes, scallops are high in microplastics. As filter-feeding bivalves consumed whole, they accumulate a greater load of microplastics and associated contaminants compared to many other seafood options where the digestive tract is discarded. While the full implications for human health are still being investigated, the potential risks from physical particles, chemical additives, and absorbed pollutants warrant attention. Informed consumers can take personal steps to reduce their intake, but the long-term solution lies in addressing the source of marine plastic pollution at a global scale. Consumers should make mindful choices while advocating for broader environmental policies that protect marine ecosystems and our food supply.

Frequently Asked Questions

As filter-feeding bivalves, scallops draw in large volumes of water and, in doing so, ingest microscopic plastic particles along with their regular food sources. Unlike many fish, they are consumed whole, meaning the microplastics they accumulate are not removed.

The answer varies depending on the specific location and farming practices. Some studies have found higher levels in farmed shellfish, while others suggest it depends more on the environmental pollution of the water at the source.

Since microplastics are integrated into the scallops' tissues, there is no effective way for a consumer to fully remove them. Rinsing can only eliminate surface contaminants.

Common microplastic types include fibers from synthetic clothing (polyester, nylon), fragments from broken-down plastic bottles and packaging, and polyethylene pellets.

Potential health risks include inflammation, disruption of the gut microbiome, and exposure to harmful chemical additives that leach from the plastic, though more research is needed to understand the long-term effects.

Making dietary choices is a personal decision. While scallops contain microplastics, health experts often recommend a balanced diet. Focusing on reducing overall plastic exposure and diversifying your diet are pragmatic approaches.

You can reduce exposure by minimizing single-use plastic, choosing natural-fiber clothing, filtering your drinking water, and buying less processed food.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.