Skip to content

How Good Are UK Food Standards? An Expert Analysis

5 min read

According to a September 2025 FSA survey, 89% of respondents were confident that the food they buy is safe to eat, though questions persist about how good are UK food standards following recent changes. This trust is built on a robust system, but recent shifts, particularly since Brexit, have introduced new complexities and potential vulnerabilities.

Quick Summary

An expert review of UK food standards, including the impact of Brexit, regulatory divergences from the EU, and the effectiveness of oversight bodies like the Food Standards Agency. It examines safety protocols, import controls, and consumer confidence in the current system.

Key Points

  • Core Regulations: The Food Safety Act 1990 is the foundation of UK food law, with much of the system derived from former EU regulations, now known as 'assimilated law'.

  • Post-Brexit Divergence: The UK's food standards are now diverging from the EU's in areas like additives (e.g., E171), pesticide levels, and novel food approvals.

  • Import Controls: While imported food must meet UK standards, the full implementation of border checks on EU imports has been delayed, raising some safety concerns.

  • Resource Strain: Cuts to local authority food safety and standards officer roles have reduced enforcement capacity, adding pressure to the system.

  • Consumer Confidence: Despite shifts, consumer confidence in food safety is generally high (89% confident in a Sep 2025 survey), though trust is lower for those concerned about Brexit impacts.

  • Hygiene Transparency Gap: In England, the voluntary display of Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS) stickers allows some businesses to mislead consumers with incorrect ratings.

  • Food Affordability Concerns: High food prices and economic pressures are a major consumer concern and can influence food purchasing and preparation behaviours.

In This Article

A Robust Foundation Facing New Challenges

The UK has long enjoyed a reputation for high food safety and quality standards, backed by a comprehensive legal framework and strong enforcement bodies like the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and Food Standards Scotland (FSS). However, since leaving the European Union, the system has entered a new phase, marked by regulatory divergence, evolving trade agreements, and resource pressures. While the core principles of protecting public health remain, new complexities are emerging that warrant closer examination.

The UK's Regulatory Framework

Foundations of UK Food Law

The overarching legal framework for UK food safety is the Food Safety Act 1990, which prevents food from being rendered injurious to health, ensures its quality meets consumer expectations, and prohibits false or misleading descriptions. Following Brexit, the majority of EU food laws were retained and converted into UK 'assimilated law'. However, the government now has the authority to amend or repeal these laws, which can lead to regulatory divergence from the EU. A short deadline for reviewing retained EU law, ending in December 2023, was a concern for many experts, who saw a risk of accidentally losing crucial legislation due to time constraints. This legislative shift represents a significant change in governance, with UK ministers now holding more discretion over food law.

Enforcement Bodies and their Roles

The enforcement of UK food standards is a collaborative effort involving several bodies:

  • Food Standards Agency (FSA): Responsible for food and feed safety across England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. It develops policies and provides guidance to businesses and consumers.
  • Food Standards Scotland (FSS): The independent food standards authority for Scotland, established in 2015.
  • Local Authorities: These bodies deliver much of the day-to-day enforcement and official controls. They inspect food premises, conduct sampling, and ensure businesses comply with hygiene and standards laws.
  • National and Scottish Food Crime Units: These units investigate serious and organised food crime, such as fraud and adulteration.

The Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS), overseen by the FSA and local authorities, provides a visible rating for food businesses based on inspections. While displaying the rating is mandatory in Wales and Northern Ireland, it remains voluntary in England, a factor exposed by a recent BBC investigation that revealed some establishments were deceptively displaying incorrect, high ratings. This highlights a potential weakness in consumer protection in England compared to other UK nations. Furthermore, significant cuts to local authority food safety officer posts, reported in recent years, have raised concerns about the capacity to carry out essential checks.

Post-Brexit Challenges and Divergence

Divergence from EU Standards

Since Brexit, the UK's path has diverged from the EU's, leading to some notable differences:

  • Food Additives: The EU has banned some additives, such as the food colour titanium dioxide (E171), following risk assessments by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), while it remains permitted in Great Britain.
  • Pesticides: Divergence in pesticide maximum residue levels (MRLs) has occurred. The EU has strengthened limits on certain chemicals, while the UK has not always followed suit.
  • Novel Foods: The EU has approved several novel food products, including certain insect powders for human consumption, which are not yet permitted in the UK.
  • Genetic Technologies: The UK is progressing with legislation on Precision Bred Organisms (PBOs), potentially creating a different regulatory landscape from the EU.

Import Control and Border Challenges

The UK's import regime has seen changes and delays. While imported crops from abroad must meet UK legal standards, the full implementation of border controls for goods from the EU has been repeatedly deferred. In April 2023, the FSA welcomed proposals for phased-in, risk-based controls for EU imports, reflecting concerns that a lack of assurances could compromise safety. However, resource shortages in enforcement capacity, including a decline in Official Veterinarians, further complicate matters. International assurance schemes and rigorous testing are used to verify standards for non-EU imports, but the system relies heavily on importers and contractual agreements.

Comparison: UK vs EU Food Standards

Feature UK Approach (Post-Brexit) EU Approach
Regulatory Framework Assimilated EU law, amendable by UK ministers, underpinned by Food Safety Act 1990 EU-wide regulations, offering a harmonised standard across member states
Decision Making Independent UK authorities (FSA, FSS), with ministers having greater discretion European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) conducts risk assessments for all member states
Additives (e.g., E171) Retained permission for some substances banned in the EU based on different risk management Ban on substances like titanium dioxide (E171) based on EFSA assessments
Pesticide Levels Diverging approach on Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) for certain pesticides Strengthened limits on several chemicals and pesticide residues
Novel Foods Separate approval process, leading to different substances being permitted or not Authorisation processes can lead to approval of products not yet permitted in the UK
Food Hygiene Display Mandatory in Wales & Northern Ireland; voluntary in England, where misrepresentation is possible Generally mandatory or enforced effectively in member states for consumer clarity

Public Perception and Confidence

Despite the recent changes, consumer confidence in UK food safety remains high, with 89% expressing confidence in a recent FSA survey. However, trust is not universal. Some consumers are wary of post-Brexit changes and trade deals, believing standards may be compromised. Food affordability has also become a significant concern, with a majority of consumers worried about food prices. Research has shown that financial pressures can lead to risky food preparation and storage behaviours, though there is no direct evidence yet linking this to an increase in foodborne illness. A recent BBC exposé on food outlets in England misrepresenting their Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS) scores also highlighted a specific area of concern for consumer trust.

Maintaining High UK Food Standards

The ongoing commitment to maintaining high standards involves a multi-pronged approach:

  • Risk-Based Controls: The UK is implementing new risk-based controls for food and feed imports, aiming to ensure consistency whether products come from the EU or elsewhere.
  • Third-Party Assurance Schemes: Schemes like Red Tractor Assurance provide additional checks and safeguards throughout the supply chain, often exceeding minimum legal requirements for domestically produced food.
  • Incident Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of food incidents and outbreaks by the FSA and FSS helps identify and address systemic risks, such as allergens or contaminants. The use of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) has enhanced the ability to detect and investigate foodborne disease outbreaks.
  • Addressing Capacity Issues: Efforts are underway to address staffing shortages in enforcement roles at both the local and national level, including recruitment for Official Veterinarians.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the core legal framework and regulatory bodies provide a strong foundation for UK food standards, the landscape is evolving significantly. Post-Brexit regulatory divergence from the EU, ongoing import control implementation, and local authority resource issues present genuine challenges that could affect enforcement and consumer confidence. However, with high overall consumer trust and bodies like the FSA and FSS committed to adapting, UK food standards remain robust. The situation demands continued vigilance from regulators and consumers alike, particularly in light of economic pressures and the potential for greater divergence over time. For more information, the Food Standards Agency website is an excellent resource, offering extensive information on food safety and regulation https://www.food.gov.uk/.

Frequently Asked Questions

Not necessarily lower, but they are diverging. While many core principles remain similar, the UK is now independent and can make different regulatory choices regarding food additives, pesticides, and novel foods based on its own risk management approach.

The FHRS is a scheme run by the FSA and local authorities that rates food businesses from 0 (urgent improvement necessary) to 5 (very good) based on their hygiene standards during inspection. The ratings are publicly available online.

Displaying the FHRS rating sticker is mandatory in Wales and Northern Ireland. However, it is voluntary in England, which has led to instances where businesses choose not to display a low rating or display a false, higher one.

Yes, imports from the EU and elsewhere must comply with UK food law. The UK is currently phasing in risk-based controls for EU imports, following previous delays in full border checks. The FSA has expressed strong support for robust import controls to maintain safety.

Assurance schemes are voluntary programs that set standards for UK farms and producers, often going beyond legal minimums. They provide additional safeguards and assurance on aspects like safety, welfare, and environmental protection throughout the supply chain.

According to FSA surveys, the top concerns for consumers include food prices, food poverty, the processing of food (ultra-processed foods), and, to a lesser extent, the safety implications of new trade deals.

Enforcement has faced challenges due to reductions in local authority staffing, particularly for food standards and safety officer posts. There have also been issues with recruiting Official Veterinarians who inspect meat establishments.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.