Skip to content

Is Stevia Considered Artificial Sugar? Separating Natural from Synthetic Sweeteners

3 min read

While some might assume it's just another synthetic substitute, stevia is actually derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant, a shrub native to South America. The confusion often arises from the fact that the final product found in stores is a highly processed extract, not the raw leaf itself.

Quick Summary

Stevia is a natural, plant-derived sweetener, not an artificial sugar, but the extract used in products is highly refined. It is derived from steviol glycosides found in the stevia plant's leaves.

Key Points

  • Natural Origin: Stevia is not an artificial sweetener; it is derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant.

  • Refined Extract: The stevia product sold in stores is a highly processed and purified extract of steviol glycosides, not the whole leaf.

  • FDA Status: Only high-purity stevia extracts (95% or greater) have been granted GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) status by the FDA; whole leaves and crude extracts are not approved.

  • Chemical vs. Botanical: Unlike artificial sweeteners (e.g., aspartame, sucralose) which are chemically synthesized in a lab, stevia's sweet compounds originate from a natural source.

  • Blended Products: Many retail stevia products contain fillers like erythritol and maltodextrin, which can impact taste and digestion.

  • Safety Profile: Stevia has been extensively studied and is considered safe for the general population within an acceptable daily intake, including for people with diabetes.

  • Consumer Awareness: Reading product labels is essential to understand if a product contains pure stevia extract or a blend of sweeteners and additives.

In This Article

Understanding the Origins of Stevia

Stevia's story begins with the Stevia rebaudiana plant, a species in the sunflower family. The sweet compounds, known as steviol glycosides, are naturally present in the plant's leaves. For centuries, indigenous communities in South America, particularly the Guaraní people in Paraguay and Brazil, have used these leaves to sweeten food and drink, referring to them as 'sweet herb' or 'ka'a he'ê'.

The Purification Process: Why Stevia Isn't Simply a Leaf

Despite its plant-based origins, the stevia found in most retail products is not the whole, unprocessed leaf. The journey from plant to packet involves a significant amount of processing to isolate the sweet-tasting steviol glycosides and remove the bitter aftertaste often associated with the raw leaf. The process typically involves:

  • Harvesting and drying the stevia leaves.
  • Steeping the dried leaves in hot water to extract the sweet compounds.
  • Filtering and purifying the liquid extract to remove plant matter and other impurities.
  • Concentrating the resulting solution, often followed by spray-drying to create the familiar powdered extract.

It is this extensive purification that leads some to question how 'natural' the final product truly is, despite its botanical source. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has given 'Generally Recognized as Safe' (GRAS) status only to these high-purity steviol glycoside extracts (at least 95% pure), not to whole stevia leaves or crude extracts.

The Difference Between Stevia and True Artificial Sweeteners

Artificial sweeteners, such as aspartame and sucralose, are synthetic compounds created entirely in a laboratory. They have no natural, plant-based counterpart and are designed to mimic the taste of sugar without adding calories. Stevia, on the other hand, starts with a natural plant source, and the processing is designed to isolate and purify the natural sweetening compounds already present.

Key distinctions between stevia and artificial sweeteners

Feature Stevia (Purified Extract) Artificial Sweeteners (e.g., Aspartame, Sucralose)
Source Plant-based (Stevia rebaudiana) Synthetically manufactured in a lab
Processing Refined to extract and purify steviol glycosides from leaves Chemically created from modified sugar molecules or other compounds
Safety Status High-purity extracts are GRAS by the FDA Approved by the FDA, with extensive research on safety
Aftertaste Some variants may have a lingering, licorice-like or bitter note Some may have a metallic or distinct aftertaste
Common Blends Often blended with erythritol or maltodextrin for bulk Rarely blended with other sweeteners; sold individually or as mixtures

Considerations for Consumers

While stevia's plant-based origins distinguish it from truly artificial products, its highly refined nature means it's not simply a 'natural' ingredient in the same vein as fresh fruit. Consumers should consider several factors when choosing stevia or other zero-calorie sweeteners:

  • Read the Label: Many retail stevia products are blends. Check the ingredients list to see if fillers like erythritol, dextrose, or maltodextrin have been added.
  • Watch for Aftertaste: The specific steviol glycosides present can influence the taste profile. Some people are more sensitive to the aftertaste than others. Higher-purity extracts, like Reb M, are often developed to minimize this.
  • Individual Tolerance: Like many sweeteners, excessive consumption can cause digestive issues like bloating or nausea for some people due to the presence of sugar alcohols in some blends.

Ultimately, the choice between stevia, other sweeteners, or reducing sweet intake depends on individual health goals, taste preferences, and ethical considerations regarding food processing. The debate over its 'natural' status highlights the complexity of food labeling in a modern processing landscape.

Conclusion

To answer the question, "Is stevia considered artificial sugar?", the definitive answer is no—stevia is not an artificial sugar. Artificial sweeteners are chemically synthesized, while stevia originates from a plant. The confusion stems from the industrial process that refines the plant's leaves into a high-purity, calorie-free extract, a version of stevia approved as safe for consumption by major regulatory bodies like the FDA. While its plant-based origin sets it apart, the refinement process means the final product is not a simple, unprocessed food item. For those seeking sugar alternatives, stevia provides a popular option, but understanding its origins and production process is key to making an informed dietary choice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Stevia is neither a sugar nor a sugar alcohol. It is a non-nutritive, zero-calorie sweetener derived from the stevia plant, while sugar alcohols like erythritol may be added as fillers to stevia blends.

Stevia is sometimes criticized because the commercial products are highly refined and processed extracts, which some argue removes them from being truly 'natural' in a whole-food sense. The FDA also only recognizes the high-purity extracts as safe, not the unprocessed leaf.

No, purified stevia extract does not contain carbohydrates or calories and does not raise blood sugar levels. This makes it a suitable alternative for people with diabetes.

Yes, there are different forms, including the whole leaf, crude extract, and high-purity steviol glycoside extracts, like Reb-A, which are found in most commercial products. The different glycosides have varying levels of sweetness and potential aftertaste.

While purified stevia is generally well-tolerated, some blended products contain sugar alcohols like erythritol, which can cause bloating or other digestive discomfort in sensitive individuals, especially in large amounts.

Both stevia and monk fruit are natural, plant-based, zero-calorie sweeteners, but they come from different plants. Stevia is from the stevia plant, while monk fruit is from a small gourd. Both are processed to extract and purify their sweet compounds.

The FDA initially banned stevia in 1991 due to safety concerns and a lack of toxicological information. After further research, the FDA granted high-purity steviol glycoside extracts GRAS status in 2008, classifying them as safe for consumption.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.