Skip to content

Nutrition Diet: What is the least harmful artificial sweetener?

5 min read

According to a 2023 World Health Organization (WHO) guideline, non-sugar sweeteners do not significantly help with long-term body fat reduction, raising questions about their role in a healthy diet. When considering a calorie-free option, determining what is the least harmful artificial sweetener is a key concern for many.

Quick Summary

This article explores the safety profiles of various sugar substitutes, highlighting current research on common options like stevia, monk fruit, and erythritol to help readers make informed dietary choices for better health.

Key Points

  • Stevia and Monk Fruit are top contenders: These plant-derived sweeteners have strong safety records, zero calories, and don't significantly impact blood sugar levels.

  • Erythritol has recent cardiovascular concerns: A 2023 study linked higher blood levels of this sugar alcohol to an increased risk of cardiovascular events, raising caution among health experts.

  • Sucralose and Aspartame have ongoing controversies: Sucralose raises gut microbiome concerns, while aspartame has a mixed safety history and was flagged as a 'possible carcinogen' by the WHO in 2023 (an assessment the FDA disputes).

  • Check for purity and fillers: Many commercial products blend sweeteners with other ingredients like erythritol, which can change their safety profile and caloric content.

  • Focus on overall moderation: The healthiest approach is to minimize reliance on any added sweeteners, regardless of type, and retrain your palate to enjoy less-sweet foods and drinks.

In This Article

Understanding the Landscape of Sweeteners

In the quest to reduce sugar intake, many people turn to sugar substitutes. These can be categorized into several types: artificial sweeteners, plant-derived sweeteners, and sugar alcohols. The key difference often lies in how the body processes them, their caloric content, and their origin. While the FDA and other regulatory bodies generally approve most sweeteners as safe within acceptable daily intake (ADI) limits, ongoing research continues to explore potential long-term effects.

  • Artificial Sweeteners: These are synthetic compounds, often hundreds of times sweeter than sugar, that offer little to no calories. Examples include sucralose (Splenda), aspartame (Equal, NutraSweet), saccharin (Sweet'N Low), and acesulfame potassium (Ace-K).
  • Plant-Derived Sweeteners: Sourced from natural plants, these include purified stevia leaf extracts and monk fruit extract. The intense sweetening compounds (steviol glycosides and mogrosides) are non-nutritive and generally considered safe.
  • Sugar Alcohols (Polyols): These are carbohydrates that are neither sugar nor alcohol but offer sweetness with fewer calories. Erythritol and xylitol are two well-known examples. While naturally occurring, they are often industrially produced.

The Contenders for Least Harmful

Based on current research, purified stevia and monk fruit extract consistently receive high marks for safety and minimal side effects, especially compared to some other options.

Stevia: The Plant-Powered Option

Stevia is extracted from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant. It is 200–400 times sweeter than sugar and contains no calories.

  • Safety Profile: Stevia has a long history of traditional use and a robust modern safety record. Regulatory agencies, including the FDA, have approved high-purity stevia extracts as 'Generally Recognized As Safe' (GRAS). Decades of research have shown no significant adverse health effects from regular consumption.
  • Benefits: It has a glycemic index (GI) of zero, meaning it does not raise blood sugar or insulin levels, making it a good choice for diabetics. Some studies suggest it may have beneficial effects on blood pressure and insulin sensitivity.
  • Considerations: Cheaper, less-purified forms may have a bitter, licorice-like aftertaste, though this is minimized in high-purity extracts.

Monk Fruit: A Promising Newcomer

Monk fruit, or luo han guo, extract comes from a small Southeast Asian melon and is 100–250 times sweeter than sugar.

  • Safety Profile: The FDA has not objected to the GRAS status for monk fruit extract, and it is considered safe for the general population. It has been used for centuries in traditional Chinese medicine.
  • Benefits: It contains zero calories and does not affect blood sugar. Mogrosides, the sweetening compounds, are also potent antioxidants.
  • Considerations: Monk fruit is more expensive than other sweeteners and is often blended with other ingredients like erythritol. Limited long-term studies exist compared to stevia, though current evidence is positive.

Evaluating Other Common Sweeteners

While all FDA-approved sweeteners are deemed safe within set limits, some carry more controversy or potential side effects based on current research.

Erythritol: The Sugar Alcohol Controversy

Erythritol is a sugar alcohol that tastes similar to sugar but has almost zero calories.

  • Recent Concerns: A 2023 study published in Nature Medicine from the Cleveland Clinic raised concerns linking high blood levels of erythritol to an increased risk of heart attack and stroke. While the FDA later reviewed the study and determined it didn't establish a causal link, the finding has prompted some to be cautious, especially those with pre-existing cardiovascular risks.
  • Side Effects: In high doses, sugar alcohols like erythritol can cause digestive issues such as bloating, gas, and diarrhea, though erythritol is generally better tolerated than others.

Sucralose (Splenda): Gut Microbiome and Heat Stability

Sucralose is a synthetic, zero-calorie sweetener derived from sugar.

  • Gut Health: Some animal and human studies have raised concerns that sucralose may alter the gut microbiome and affect insulin sensitivity, though results are inconsistent.
  • Baking Concerns: Some research indicates that sucralose may generate potentially harmful compounds called chloropropanols when heated, though more investigation is needed.

Aspartame (Equal, NutraSweet): The Cancer Debate

Aspartame is a low-calorie artificial sweetener made from two amino acids, aspartic acid and phenylalanine.

  • Regulatory Stance: For decades, regulatory bodies like the FDA have deemed aspartame safe for the general population, with a significant body of research supporting this stance. However, a 2023 review by the World Health Organization (WHO) classified aspartame as a possible carcinogen (Group 2B), based on limited evidence. The FDA disagreed with the IARC classification, citing insufficient evidence.
  • Phenylketonuria (PKU): Individuals with this rare genetic disorder cannot metabolize phenylalanine and must avoid aspartame.

Comparison of Popular Sweeteners

Feature Stevia Monk Fruit Erythritol Sucralose Aspartame
Origin Plant (leaf extract) Plant (fruit extract) Sugar Alcohol Synthetic (from sugar) Synthetic (from amino acids)
Calories 0 0 ~0.24 kcal/g 0 4 kcal/g (negligible)
Sweetness 200–400x sugar 100–250x sugar ~70% sugar ~600x sugar ~200x sugar
Blood Sugar No effect No effect No effect Potential effect Potential effect
Heat Stable? Yes Yes Yes Yes (but controversial) No
Safety Notes Excellent safety record. Purified form is GRAS. GRAS status, though less long-term research than stevia. Recent cardiovascular risk concerns, especially at high levels. Can cause GI issues. Concerns about gut microbiome and heating safety. Long history of use but classified as possible carcinogen by WHO (disputed by FDA). Avoid with PKU.

Beyond Artificial Sweeteners: Healthier Approaches

The healthiest approach is to reduce overall intake of sweet foods and drinks, regardless of the sweetener used. Sweeteners, even those deemed safest, can perpetuate a preference for sweet flavors, hindering efforts to appreciate naturally less-sweet foods.

  • Use Whole Foods: For natural sweetness, use whole fruits like bananas, dates, or berries in smoothies or baked goods. This also provides fiber and nutrients absent in sweeteners.
  • Focus on Water: Prioritize water, unsweetened coffee, or tea to help reset your palate away from intensely sweet flavors.
  • Moderate Intake: If you do use sweeteners, stick to the smallest amount necessary and view them as a short-term aid rather than a long-term solution.

What is the Least Harmful Artificial Sweetener? The Verdict

While all FDA-approved sweeteners are technically safe within their recommended ADI, a closer look at the research and long-term data points to plant-derived options like purified stevia and monk fruit extract as the least controversial and potentially most benign choices. They do not contribute calories or significantly impact blood sugar and have strong safety records. Other sweeteners, like sucralose, erythritol, and aspartame, carry more recent or conflicting research regarding potential adverse effects on gut health, cardiovascular risk, and carcinogenicity. Ultimately, the healthiest approach for long-term health is to reduce your reliance on all added sweeteners and focus on whole, unprocessed foods. For more insight into diet and nutrition, consider consulting credible resources like the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

Frequently Asked Questions

For individuals with diabetes, stevia and monk fruit extract are often recommended. Both have a glycemic index of zero and do not raise blood sugar or insulin levels. It is important to check product labels, as many consumer products blend these with other sweeteners or sugar alcohols.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists considers sweeteners like aspartame, sucralose, and stevia to be generally safe in moderation during pregnancy. However, people with phenylketonuria (PKU) must avoid aspartame. For any dietary concerns during pregnancy, consulting a healthcare provider is recommended.

Research on the long-term impact of sweeteners on weight is mixed. Some studies show modest weight loss when replacing sugary drinks with diet versions, while others suggest they may increase appetite or disrupt metabolism, potentially leading to weight gain over time. The best approach is to reduce overall sweet food consumption.

Artificial sweeteners are synthetic, non-nutritive compounds that are intensely sweet. Sugar alcohols, like erythritol, are a type of carbohydrate with fewer calories than sugar and lower sweetness intensity. They can cause digestive issues in large quantities.

Some animal studies and limited human research suggest certain sweeteners, particularly sucralose and saccharin, may negatively affect the gut microbiome. While evidence is not conclusive, long-term effects on gut health are an area of ongoing study.

Pure stevia extract from the leaf contains only the sweetening glycosides and is well-regarded for safety. Commercial products, however, often contain fillers and other additives, such as erythritol, which can alter the product's overall safety and effect on the body.

Experts often suggest that reducing overall intake of both refined sugar and artificial sweeteners is the healthiest choice. Some functional medicine specialists argue that artificial sweeteners are potentially more detrimental long-term, while health agencies often frame them as a safer alternative to excessive added sugar. Focusing on whole, naturally sweet foods like fruit is the superior option.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.