Skip to content

What's Better, Erythritol or Stevia? A Complete Comparison

4 min read

The market for low-calorie sweeteners is expanding rapidly, with global consumption of sugar substitutes projected to continue rising. Among the most popular options are erythritol and stevia, but choosing the right one requires a deep understanding of their key differences in taste, health implications, and practical use.

Quick Summary

Erythritol, a sugar alcohol, and stevia, a plant extract, offer zero-calorie sweetness but differ significantly in flavor profile, baking properties, and potential health impacts, influencing which one is best for individual needs.

Key Points

  • Source and Processing: Erythritol is a fermented sugar alcohol from corn, while stevia is an extract from a plant leaf, but both are refined.

  • Sweetness and Taste: Stevia is significantly more potent than sugar (and erythritol) and can have a bitter aftertaste, whereas erythritol offers a clean, sugar-like taste with a cooling effect.

  • Health and Safety: While both are non-caloric and don't raise blood sugar, recent research has linked erythritol to potential cardiovascular risks, while stevia maintains a strong safety record.

  • Baking vs. Beverages: Erythritol is better for baking due to its sugar-like volume, while stevia's high intensity makes it ideal for sweetening drinks with just a few drops.

  • Digestive Tolerance: Erythritol may cause gastrointestinal discomfort in high amounts, although less so than other sugar alcohols; stevia is generally well-tolerated.

  • Best of Both Worlds: Many products blend erythritol and stevia to balance taste profiles and leverage the bulk of erythritol with the intensity of stevia.

In This Article

Understanding the Contenders

Both erythritol and stevia offer a way to enjoy sweetness without the caloric impact of traditional sugar, making them popular choices for low-carb, keto, and diabetic diets. While both have a glycemic index of zero, they are distinct compounds with different origins, tastes, and uses.

What is Erythritol?

Erythritol is a sugar alcohol, or polyol, found naturally in small amounts in some fruits like grapes and melons. However, the erythritol sold commercially is typically produced on a large scale by fermenting glucose from corn or wheat starch with yeast. The human body poorly metabolizes erythritol, absorbing about 90% of it in the small intestine before excreting it unchanged in the urine within 24 hours. This process makes it non-caloric for all practical purposes and prevents it from raising blood sugar or insulin levels.

What is Stevia?

Stevia is a natural, zero-calorie sweetener derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant, native to South America. Its intense sweetness comes from compounds called steviol glycosides, primarily rebaudioside A (Reb A). To create the refined stevia products found in stores, these glycosides are extracted from dried stevia leaves and purified, often using water or ethanol. Unlike erythritol, stevia is significantly sweeter than sugar, requiring only tiny amounts to achieve the same effect.

Erythritol vs. Stevia: The Head-to-Head Comparison

Choosing between these two sweeteners often comes down to individual preference and intended application. While they share some similarities, their differences are critical to consider.

Taste Profile

  • Erythritol: Offers a clean, sugar-like sweetness with no unpleasant aftertaste for most people. However, some individuals experience a noticeable cooling sensation, especially in high concentrations, which can be undesirable in certain foods.
  • Stevia: Known for its intense sweetness, which can be 200 to 400 times sweeter than sugar. Many people report a lingering bitter or licorice-like aftertaste, particularly with less refined products. This can be masked by blending it with other sweeteners or using high-quality extracts.

Baking and Cooking

  • Erythritol: Functions much like sugar in baked goods, providing bulk and texture. It is heat-stable and can be used in a 1.25-to-1 ratio to replace sugar in many recipes. A potential drawback is that it can crystallize after cooling, which can be problematic for things like frostings or ice cream.
  • Stevia: The high potency of stevia makes it unsuitable for direct substitution in baking recipes where sugar provides bulk. Recipe modifications are necessary, often requiring the addition of a bulking agent like erythritol or another filler to achieve the right volume and texture. It is generally heat-stable.

Health and Safety

  • Erythritol: Generally well-tolerated in moderate amounts, but excessive consumption can cause digestive issues like bloating, gas, and diarrhea, particularly with doses over 20-25 grams. More recent research has also raised cardiovascular concerns, linking high blood levels of erythritol to an increased risk of heart attack and stroke, though more in-depth studies are needed.
  • Stevia: Has a long and generally positive safety record, supported by decades of traditional use and research. Purified steviol glycoside extracts are classified as "Generally Recognized As Safe" (GRAS) by the FDA. Mild digestive upset can occur with very high intake, but it is typically temporary. No evidence of cardiovascular risk has been found in current research.

Erythritol vs. Stevia Comparison Table

Characteristic Erythritol Stevia
Source Produced from fermented corn starch Derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant
Sweetness (vs. sugar) ~70% as sweet 200-400 times sweeter
Calories ~0.2 calories per gram (very low) Zero
Glycemic Index 0 0
Taste Profile Clean, sugar-like taste; can have a cooling effect Intense sweetness; can have a bitter or licorice aftertaste
Baking Performance Adds bulk, similar to sugar; can crystallize Needs a bulking agent; high potency requires recipe adjustments
Digestive Impact May cause bloating and gas in high amounts Generally well-tolerated; potential digestive issues at very high doses
Cardiovascular Risk Linked to increased risk of heart attack and stroke in some studies No known cardiovascular risk based on current research

Choosing the Right Sweetener for Your Needs

Your ideal sweetener depends on your priorities, health status, and intended use.

  • For baking: Erythritol is generally the easier option when replacing sugar in recipes that rely on bulk and texture. Its similarity to sugar makes for a smoother transition, though be mindful of crystallization.
  • For beverages: Stevia is the clear winner for drinks like coffee or tea, where its high potency means only a few drops or a small packet are needed. Its zero-calorie count is another advantage here.
  • For diabetics and keto diets: Both sweeteners have a zero glycemic index and are suitable for these lifestyles. However, individuals should check product labels, as some blends may include other ingredients that impact blood sugar.
  • For safety and long-term use: Recent cardiovascular concerns surrounding erythritol suggest that stevia may be the safer long-term choice, particularly for those with heart disease risk factors. Stevia has a long-standing positive safety record. You can read more about the cardiovascular risk factors associated with erythritol in this NIH-published research: Erythritol and cardiovascular events.
  • For mitigating aftertaste: Combining erythritol and stevia is a common strategy to mask stevia's aftertaste while leveraging erythritol's bulk and sweetness profile.

The Bottom Line

Ultimately, there is no single "better" sweetener, but a more informed choice for your specific situation. If your priority is a sugar-like texture for baking and you consume it in moderation, erythritol is a viable option. However, if you are concerned about long-term health risks, particularly heart-related issues, or prefer a zero-calorie option for sweetening beverages, stevia is likely the more prudent choice. Paying attention to personal tolerance and checking labels for additional ingredients is always recommended, regardless of which sweetener you choose.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on current research, stevia has a long-standing positive safety record and is generally considered safe for long-term use. Recent studies have raised concerns about erythritol's potential link to cardiovascular risks, suggesting that stevia may be the safer option, especially for regular consumption.

Both pure stevia and pure erythritol have a zero glycemic index and do not impact blood sugar or insulin levels, making them suitable for people with diabetes. However, checking product labels is crucial, as some blends contain other ingredients that can raise blood sugar.

Yes, but they behave differently. Erythritol provides bulk like sugar and is often preferred for baking, though it may crystallize. Stevia is so potent that it requires a bulking agent to replace sugar in recipes, which is why it's often blended with erythritol for baking.

The bitter or licorice-like aftertaste associated with stevia is due to the various steviol glycosides present in the plant extract. Higher quality, more purified extracts (like Reb A) minimize this taste, while less refined products often have a stronger aftertaste.

Yes, excessive consumption of erythritol can cause digestive issues such as bloating, gas, cramping, and diarrhea in some people. It is generally better tolerated than other sugar alcohols because most of it is absorbed before reaching the large intestine.

No, both erythritol and stevia are non-cariogenic, meaning they do not contribute to tooth decay. Erythritol has even been shown to reduce plaque-causing bacteria.

Both pure stevia and pure erythritol are considered excellent for a keto diet, as they have zero net carbs and a glycemic index of zero. The best choice depends on your specific use case and taste preferences.

Yes, many people blend erythritol and stevia to balance their properties. Erythritol helps mask stevia's aftertaste while providing bulk, and stevia's high sweetness allows for less erythritol to be used, which can reduce the risk of digestive upset.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.